Perception of global norm of government climate action and support for domestic climate policies

IF 7 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Kim-Pong Tam , Hoi-Wing Chan
{"title":"Perception of global norm of government climate action and support for domestic climate policies","authors":"Kim-Pong Tam ,&nbsp;Hoi-Wing Chan","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As public support is important for policy changes, it is crucial to understand how citizens construct their views toward climate policies. Based on the widely documented effect of descriptive social norms on human behavior, we hypothesized that individuals' support for climate policies to be implemented in their own country would be stronger when they perceive greater prevalence of climate action by national governments worldwide. We tested this hypothesis with two survey studies (Study 1 and Study 2) and one experiment (Study 3). In the survey studies, using samples from China and the United States (total N = 4033), we observed that respondents who perceived that a stronger global norm of climate efforts by national governments worldwide were more supportive of domestic climate policies. In addition, four mediators underlying this effect (including informational influence, normative influence, and two forms of efficacy beliefs) were identified. In the experiment, with participants from the United State (N = 447), we found that a fact-based informational intervention effectively increased participants’ perceptions of global prevalence of coal power phaseout, which, in turn, led to stronger support for a similar action in their own country. These findings introduce novel perspectives to the understanding of public attitudes toward climate policies and the study of climate change opinions. They also imply that communicators and policymakers can leverage the power of social influence, through messages built around narratives of a global norm, to garner public support for domestic climate efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"106 ","pages":"Article 102694"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027249442500177X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As public support is important for policy changes, it is crucial to understand how citizens construct their views toward climate policies. Based on the widely documented effect of descriptive social norms on human behavior, we hypothesized that individuals' support for climate policies to be implemented in their own country would be stronger when they perceive greater prevalence of climate action by national governments worldwide. We tested this hypothesis with two survey studies (Study 1 and Study 2) and one experiment (Study 3). In the survey studies, using samples from China and the United States (total N = 4033), we observed that respondents who perceived that a stronger global norm of climate efforts by national governments worldwide were more supportive of domestic climate policies. In addition, four mediators underlying this effect (including informational influence, normative influence, and two forms of efficacy beliefs) were identified. In the experiment, with participants from the United State (N = 447), we found that a fact-based informational intervention effectively increased participants’ perceptions of global prevalence of coal power phaseout, which, in turn, led to stronger support for a similar action in their own country. These findings introduce novel perspectives to the understanding of public attitudes toward climate policies and the study of climate change opinions. They also imply that communicators and policymakers can leverage the power of social influence, through messages built around narratives of a global norm, to garner public support for domestic climate efforts.
感知政府气候行动的全球规范和对国内气候政策的支持
由于公众支持对政策变化很重要,因此了解公民如何构建他们对气候政策的看法至关重要。基于广泛记录的描述性社会规范对人类行为的影响,我们假设,当个人意识到各国政府在全球范围内更普遍地采取气候行动时,他们对在自己国家实施气候政策的支持会更强。我们通过两项调查研究(研究1和研究2)和一项实验(研究3)来检验这一假设。在调查研究中,使用来自中国和美国的样本(总N = 4033),我们观察到,认为世界各国政府在气候努力方面的全球规范更强的受访者更支持国内气候政策。此外,我们还发现了这种效应背后的四种中介因素(包括信息影响、规范影响和两种形式的效能信念)。在实验中,来自美国的参与者(N = 447),我们发现基于事实的信息干预有效地增加了参与者对全球煤电淘汰的普遍程度的看法,这反过来又导致他们更强烈地支持自己国家的类似行动。这些发现为理解公众对气候政策的态度和研究气候变化意见提供了新的视角。它们还意味着,传播者和决策者可以利用社会影响力的力量,通过围绕全球规范叙事构建的信息,争取公众对国内气候努力的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信