Investigating Interprofessional Education (IPE) Faculty Development Programs within United States IPE Centers

Q3 Social Sciences
Cheryl Babin , Yasser Salem , Beth Davis
{"title":"Investigating Interprofessional Education (IPE) Faculty Development Programs within United States IPE Centers","authors":"Cheryl Babin ,&nbsp;Yasser Salem ,&nbsp;Beth Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2025.100761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Interprofessional education (IPE) faculty development is vital for fostering IPE and collaborative practice initiatives. To our knowledge, there are no original research studies that describe the IPE faculty development in U.S. IPE Centers. The purpose of this study is to identify, describe, and expand the knowledge on IPE faculty development programs occurring within current IPE Centers in the U.S. through evidence-based research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An electronic survey was distributed by email to 185 contacts for IPE Centers listed on the National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education website. Descriptive statistics were performed on all closed-ended questions. The authors identified respondents’ open-ended comments and major thematic areas.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Out of 169 deliverable emails, 70 responded to the survey and 57 met the inclusion criteria and completed the survey. Thirty-seven respondents (65 %) indicated that their institution/organization have a central IPE office and have dedicated staff/personnel. Thirty-eight respondents (67 %) reported that their institution/organization has an IPE faculty development program/activities. Almost all respondents (94 %) reported including training in the IPEC Core Competency areas. Length, format, and assessment results were varied.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study provides valuable insights about IPE faculty development programs in the U.S. that may guide existing and developing IPE faculty development programs. The findings highlight the importance of institutional/organizational support, coordination mechanisms, and the need for standardized assessments in advancing the goals of IPE. Authors provide recommendations that may enhance the development, implementation, and sustainability of IPE faculty development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100761"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452625000242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Interprofessional education (IPE) faculty development is vital for fostering IPE and collaborative practice initiatives. To our knowledge, there are no original research studies that describe the IPE faculty development in U.S. IPE Centers. The purpose of this study is to identify, describe, and expand the knowledge on IPE faculty development programs occurring within current IPE Centers in the U.S. through evidence-based research.

Methods

An electronic survey was distributed by email to 185 contacts for IPE Centers listed on the National Center for Interprofessional Practice and Education website. Descriptive statistics were performed on all closed-ended questions. The authors identified respondents’ open-ended comments and major thematic areas.

Results

Out of 169 deliverable emails, 70 responded to the survey and 57 met the inclusion criteria and completed the survey. Thirty-seven respondents (65 %) indicated that their institution/organization have a central IPE office and have dedicated staff/personnel. Thirty-eight respondents (67 %) reported that their institution/organization has an IPE faculty development program/activities. Almost all respondents (94 %) reported including training in the IPEC Core Competency areas. Length, format, and assessment results were varied.

Conclusions

This study provides valuable insights about IPE faculty development programs in the U.S. that may guide existing and developing IPE faculty development programs. The findings highlight the importance of institutional/organizational support, coordination mechanisms, and the need for standardized assessments in advancing the goals of IPE. Authors provide recommendations that may enhance the development, implementation, and sustainability of IPE faculty development.
调查跨专业教育(IPE)教师发展计划在美国IPE中心
目的跨专业教育(IPE)教师的发展对于促进IPE和合作实践的主动性至关重要。据我们所知,目前还没有关于美国国际政治经济学中心师资发展的原创研究。本研究的目的是通过基于证据的研究,识别、描述和扩展当前美国国际政治经济学中心的国际政治经济学教师发展项目的知识。方法通过电子邮件向国家跨专业实践与教育中心网站上列出的185个IPE中心的联系人发送电子调查。对所有封闭式问题进行描述性统计。作者确定了受访者的开放式评论和主要主题领域。结果在169封可发送邮件中,70封回复了调查,57封符合纳入标准并完成了调查。37名受访者(65%)表示,他们的机构/组织有一个中央IPE办公室,并有专门的员工/人员。38名受访者(67%)表示,他们所在的机构/组织有国际政治政治学院教师发展项目/活动。几乎所有的受访者(94%)都报告了IPEC核心能力领域的培训。长度、格式和评估结果各不相同。本研究为美国国际政治政治学院教师发展项目提供了有价值的见解,可以指导现有的和正在发展的国际政治政治学院教师发展项目。研究结果强调了机构/组织支持、协调机制的重要性,以及在推进国际政治经济学目标方面进行标准化评估的必要性。作者提供的建议,可能会加强发展,实施和可持续发展的国际政治政治学院师资队伍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信