{"title":"Machine learning-based fatigue life prediction of double-sided U-rib welded joints considering multiple factors","authors":"Zhiyu Jie, Hao Zheng, Lexin Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2025.109187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study systematically developed and evaluated five machine learning models, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Neural Network Regression (NNR), Least Squares Boosting (LSBoost), and Random Feature Kernel Ridge Regression (RF-KRR), to address the challenges of crack depth and remaining fatigue life predictions for single- and double-sided U-rib welded joints in orthotropic steel decks, considering multiple influencing factors. A high-fidelity finite element model was established to analyze fatigue crack growth through integrated simulation using ABAQUS and FRANC3D, incorporating input features such as nominal stress range, deck thickness, welding type, residual stress, and crack length, with crack depth and remaining life as output targets. The results show that the evolution laws of the crack aspect ratio differ significantly for single- and double-sided U-rib welded joints. Correlation analysis reveals a strong positive relationship between crack length and crack depth. In contrast, residual stress, crack length, and crack depth exhibit significant negative correlations with remaining life, whereas double-sided welds and increased deck thickness contribute positively to enhanced fatigue resistance. In terms of model performance, the GPR model exhibits the highest accuracy and generalization in crack depth prediction, while the NNR model outperforms others in fatigue life prediction. Accordingly, the GPR model is recommended for crack depth prediction, and the NNR model is identified as the most suitable for fatigue life prediction.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"201 ","pages":"Article 109187"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142112325003846","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study systematically developed and evaluated five machine learning models, Support Vector Regression (SVR), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), Neural Network Regression (NNR), Least Squares Boosting (LSBoost), and Random Feature Kernel Ridge Regression (RF-KRR), to address the challenges of crack depth and remaining fatigue life predictions for single- and double-sided U-rib welded joints in orthotropic steel decks, considering multiple influencing factors. A high-fidelity finite element model was established to analyze fatigue crack growth through integrated simulation using ABAQUS and FRANC3D, incorporating input features such as nominal stress range, deck thickness, welding type, residual stress, and crack length, with crack depth and remaining life as output targets. The results show that the evolution laws of the crack aspect ratio differ significantly for single- and double-sided U-rib welded joints. Correlation analysis reveals a strong positive relationship between crack length and crack depth. In contrast, residual stress, crack length, and crack depth exhibit significant negative correlations with remaining life, whereas double-sided welds and increased deck thickness contribute positively to enhanced fatigue resistance. In terms of model performance, the GPR model exhibits the highest accuracy and generalization in crack depth prediction, while the NNR model outperforms others in fatigue life prediction. Accordingly, the GPR model is recommended for crack depth prediction, and the NNR model is identified as the most suitable for fatigue life prediction.
期刊介绍:
Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address:
Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements)
Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading
Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions
Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions)
Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects
Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue
Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation)
Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering
Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation
Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.