{"title":"Achieving win–win outcomes between urban growth and urban greening: The role of environmental governance","authors":"Jie Wang , Weilong Kong , Wenjing Han","doi":"10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Rapid urbanization challenges environmental sustainability, yet synergistic pathways remain underexplored in developing economies. This study investigates the impact of urban growth on urban greenness and the moderating role of environmental governance, using empirical data from 273 cities in China (2001–2019) and a two-way fixed effects model. Key findings are as follows: (1) An N-shaped relationship exists between urban economic growth and urban greenness, with inflection points at approximately 3500 CNY and 130,000 CNY in per capita GDP. Most cities in 2019 had surpassed the first inflection point but remained in the declining phase. Population density significantly increases greenness (β = 0.0139∗, p < 0.1), while land expansion has no statistically significant impact. (2) Environmental governance positively moderates growth–greening relationships. Economic growth enhances greenness when governance intensity (EGOV) exceeds 1.8 (marginal effect: +0.0204, p < 0.01) and land expansion improves greenness at EGOV >0.5 (interaction effect: +0.0003, p < 0.1). (3) Spatial heterogeneity analyses confirm stronger governance effects in western/northeastern regions and large cities. These results indicate that effective environmental governance can mitigate adverse effects of economic expansion, fostering a “win-win” between urban development and greening. Policymakers should prioritize governance capacity building, stage-adaptive interventions, and inter-city collaboration to balance development and sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48396,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geography","volume":"183 ","pages":"Article 103735"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geography","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622825002309","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rapid urbanization challenges environmental sustainability, yet synergistic pathways remain underexplored in developing economies. This study investigates the impact of urban growth on urban greenness and the moderating role of environmental governance, using empirical data from 273 cities in China (2001–2019) and a two-way fixed effects model. Key findings are as follows: (1) An N-shaped relationship exists between urban economic growth and urban greenness, with inflection points at approximately 3500 CNY and 130,000 CNY in per capita GDP. Most cities in 2019 had surpassed the first inflection point but remained in the declining phase. Population density significantly increases greenness (β = 0.0139∗, p < 0.1), while land expansion has no statistically significant impact. (2) Environmental governance positively moderates growth–greening relationships. Economic growth enhances greenness when governance intensity (EGOV) exceeds 1.8 (marginal effect: +0.0204, p < 0.01) and land expansion improves greenness at EGOV >0.5 (interaction effect: +0.0003, p < 0.1). (3) Spatial heterogeneity analyses confirm stronger governance effects in western/northeastern regions and large cities. These results indicate that effective environmental governance can mitigate adverse effects of economic expansion, fostering a “win-win” between urban development and greening. Policymakers should prioritize governance capacity building, stage-adaptive interventions, and inter-city collaboration to balance development and sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geography is a journal devoted to the publication of research which utilizes geographic approaches (human, physical, nature-society and GIScience) to resolve human problems that have a spatial dimension. These problems may be related to the assessment, management and allocation of the world physical and/or human resources. The underlying rationale of the journal is that only through a clear understanding of the relevant societal, physical, and coupled natural-humans systems can we resolve such problems. Papers are invited on any theme involving the application of geographical theory and methodology in the resolution of human problems.