Finding the underlying viscoelastic constitutive equation via universal differential equations and differentiable physics

IF 7.5 2区 计算机科学 Q1 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Elias C. Rodrigues , Roney L. Thompson , Dário A.B. Oliveira , Roberto F. Ausas
{"title":"Finding the underlying viscoelastic constitutive equation via universal differential equations and differentiable physics","authors":"Elias C. Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Roney L. Thompson ,&nbsp;Dário A.B. Oliveira ,&nbsp;Roberto F. Ausas","doi":"10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Determining the appropriate constitutive model to describe the behavior of a given material is a fundamental, yet challenging, aspect of rheology. While data-driven methods present a promising path for refining these models, a more in-depth investigation into the capabilities and limitations of emerging techniques is required. This research addresses this gap by employing Universal Differential Equations (UDEs) and differentiable physics to model viscoelastic fluids, merging conventional differential equations with neural networks to reconstruct missing terms in constitutive models. This study focuses on analyzing four viscoelastic models, Upper Convected Maxwell (UCM), Johnson–Segalman, Giesekus, and Exponential Phan–Thien–Tanner (ePTT) using synthetic datasets. The methodology was tested across different experimental conditions, including oscillatory and startup flows. Relative error analyses revealed that the UDEs framework maintains low and stable errors (below 0.3%) for the UCM, Johnson–Segalman, and Giesekus models under various conditions, while exhibiting higher but consistent errors (4%) for the ePTT model due to its strong nonlinearity. These findings highlight the potential of UDEs in fluid mechanics while also identifying critical areas for methodological improvement. Additionally, a model distillation approach was employed to extract simplified models from complex ones, emphasizing the versatility and robustness of UDEs in rheological modeling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50523,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 111788"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952197625017907","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Determining the appropriate constitutive model to describe the behavior of a given material is a fundamental, yet challenging, aspect of rheology. While data-driven methods present a promising path for refining these models, a more in-depth investigation into the capabilities and limitations of emerging techniques is required. This research addresses this gap by employing Universal Differential Equations (UDEs) and differentiable physics to model viscoelastic fluids, merging conventional differential equations with neural networks to reconstruct missing terms in constitutive models. This study focuses on analyzing four viscoelastic models, Upper Convected Maxwell (UCM), Johnson–Segalman, Giesekus, and Exponential Phan–Thien–Tanner (ePTT) using synthetic datasets. The methodology was tested across different experimental conditions, including oscillatory and startup flows. Relative error analyses revealed that the UDEs framework maintains low and stable errors (below 0.3%) for the UCM, Johnson–Segalman, and Giesekus models under various conditions, while exhibiting higher but consistent errors (4%) for the ePTT model due to its strong nonlinearity. These findings highlight the potential of UDEs in fluid mechanics while also identifying critical areas for methodological improvement. Additionally, a model distillation approach was employed to extract simplified models from complex ones, emphasizing the versatility and robustness of UDEs in rheological modeling.
利用通用微分方程和可微物理寻找粘弹性本构方程
确定合适的本构模型来描述给定材料的行为是流变学的一个基本但具有挑战性的方面。虽然数据驱动的方法为改进这些模型提供了一条有希望的途径,但是需要对新兴技术的能力和局限性进行更深入的研究。本研究通过使用通用微分方程(UDEs)和可微物理来模拟粘弹性流体,将传统微分方程与神经网络相结合来重建本构模型中的缺失项,从而解决了这一空白。本研究重点分析了四种粘弹性模型,即上对流Maxwell (UCM)、Johnson-Segalman、Giesekus和指数Phan-Thien-Tanner (ePTT)模型。该方法在不同的实验条件下进行了测试,包括振荡和启动流。相对误差分析显示,在各种条件下,UDEs框架对UCM、Johnson-Segalman和Giesekus模型保持了较低且稳定的误差(低于0.3%),而ePTT模型由于其强非线性而表现出较高但一致的误差(4%)。这些发现突出了uds在流体力学中的潜力,同时也确定了方法改进的关键领域。此外,采用模型蒸馏方法从复杂模型中提取简化模型,强调了模型在流变建模中的通用性和鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
505
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence (AI) is pivotal in driving the fourth industrial revolution, witnessing remarkable advancements across various machine learning methodologies. AI techniques have become indispensable tools for practicing engineers, enabling them to tackle previously insurmountable challenges. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence serves as a global platform for the swift dissemination of research elucidating the practical application of AI methods across all engineering disciplines. Submitted papers are expected to present novel aspects of AI utilized in real-world engineering applications, validated using publicly available datasets to ensure the replicability of research outcomes. Join us in exploring the transformative potential of AI in engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信