C. García-Conejo , C. Roldán-Jiménez , A.I. Cuesta-Vargas
{"title":"Effect of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation on dyspnoea in heart failure: A systematic review of assessment tools, outcomes, and FITT parameters","authors":"C. García-Conejo , C. Roldán-Jiménez , A.I. Cuesta-Vargas","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2025.100924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) programmes are strongly recommended to enhance exercise capacity and quality of life in heart failure (HF). However, their effects on dyspnoea have not been systematically reviewed, possibly due to the knowledge gap in the assessment of dyspnoea. The aim of this study was to recognise the dyspnoea tool used in HF for the EBCR trial, assess the effects of EBCR on dyspnoea and identify which patient characteristics and FITT parameters (Frequency, Intensity, Time and Type) are associated with better outcomes. A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials following the PRISMA guideline were performed, including fifteen studies (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->766 participants). Up to 8 dyspnoea measurement instruments were identified in the studies. EBCR showed a moderate effect size on dyspnoea (<em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.69, 95% CI 0.54–0.84). Larger effects were seen in patients<!--> <!--><<!--> <!-->65 years (<em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.77, 95% CI 0.54–0.99) and in non-hospitalised patients (<em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.735, 95% CI 0.550–0.921). Greater effects were observed for low-intensity (<em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.79, 95% CI 0.44–1.15) and multimodal programmes (<em>d</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.12, 95% CI 0.47–1.77). Programmes with three sessions per week and ≥12 weeks were the most common. Findings were limited due to the varying dyspnoea scales, highlighting the need for standardised assessment in HF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"59 3","pages":"Article 100924"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712025000441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (EBCR) programmes are strongly recommended to enhance exercise capacity and quality of life in heart failure (HF). However, their effects on dyspnoea have not been systematically reviewed, possibly due to the knowledge gap in the assessment of dyspnoea. The aim of this study was to recognise the dyspnoea tool used in HF for the EBCR trial, assess the effects of EBCR on dyspnoea and identify which patient characteristics and FITT parameters (Frequency, Intensity, Time and Type) are associated with better outcomes. A review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials following the PRISMA guideline were performed, including fifteen studies (n = 766 participants). Up to 8 dyspnoea measurement instruments were identified in the studies. EBCR showed a moderate effect size on dyspnoea (d = 0.69, 95% CI 0.54–0.84). Larger effects were seen in patients < 65 years (d = 0.77, 95% CI 0.54–0.99) and in non-hospitalised patients (d = 0.735, 95% CI 0.550–0.921). Greater effects were observed for low-intensity (d = 0.79, 95% CI 0.44–1.15) and multimodal programmes (d = 1.12, 95% CI 0.47–1.77). Programmes with three sessions per week and ≥12 weeks were the most common. Findings were limited due to the varying dyspnoea scales, highlighting the need for standardised assessment in HF.
期刊介绍:
La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.