{"title":"Household perception bias on water price in China: Asymmetric impacts and policy treatment","authors":"Jun–Jun Jia , Li Luo , Maorong Jiang , Huaqing Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.wre.2025.100262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Residents tend to respond to perceived water price rather than the true water price when making household water consumption decisions. The paper estimates household perception bias on the average water price and explores its impact on the adoption of daily water-saving practices, by using the unique 5449 household survey data across 50 cities in China. The bias refers to the discrepancy between perceived price and the true average price. Results from the multi-level regression model show that households can hardly perceive the true average water price accurately. Approximately 71.5 % of households underestimate the true average price to varying degrees. On average, households underestimate the true average water price by 19.3 %, which is equivalent to 0.761 Yuan per ton. There are asymmetric impacts of household perception bias. For one thing, only the underestimation bias significantly impacts on the adoption of both technical and behavioral water-saving measures. For another, it hinders the adoption of technical measures among high water consumption households, while it impedes the adoption of behavioral measures among low water consumption households. Among a total of seven machine learning classification algorithms, the Random Forest binary classifier, based on ten easily-answered feature questions, demonstrates the best performance in identifying households with underestimation bias. It constitutes a promising policy tool to implement information treatment on households with underestimation bias. It can facilitate water conservation resulting from downward perception bias, particularly by tapping into the greater water-saving potential of technical water-saving measures and high water consumption households.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48644,"journal":{"name":"Water Resources and Economics","volume":"51 ","pages":"Article 100262"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Water Resources and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212428425000076","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Residents tend to respond to perceived water price rather than the true water price when making household water consumption decisions. The paper estimates household perception bias on the average water price and explores its impact on the adoption of daily water-saving practices, by using the unique 5449 household survey data across 50 cities in China. The bias refers to the discrepancy between perceived price and the true average price. Results from the multi-level regression model show that households can hardly perceive the true average water price accurately. Approximately 71.5 % of households underestimate the true average price to varying degrees. On average, households underestimate the true average water price by 19.3 %, which is equivalent to 0.761 Yuan per ton. There are asymmetric impacts of household perception bias. For one thing, only the underestimation bias significantly impacts on the adoption of both technical and behavioral water-saving measures. For another, it hinders the adoption of technical measures among high water consumption households, while it impedes the adoption of behavioral measures among low water consumption households. Among a total of seven machine learning classification algorithms, the Random Forest binary classifier, based on ten easily-answered feature questions, demonstrates the best performance in identifying households with underestimation bias. It constitutes a promising policy tool to implement information treatment on households with underestimation bias. It can facilitate water conservation resulting from downward perception bias, particularly by tapping into the greater water-saving potential of technical water-saving measures and high water consumption households.
期刊介绍:
Water Resources and Economics is one of a series of specialist titles launched by the highly-regarded Water Research. For the purpose of sustainable water resources management, understanding the multiple connections and feedback mechanisms between water resources and the economy is crucial. Water Resources and Economics addresses the financial and economic dimensions associated with water resources use and governance, across different economic sectors like agriculture, energy, industry, shipping, recreation and urban and rural water supply, at local, regional and transboundary scale.
Topics of interest include (but are not restricted to) the economics of:
Aquatic ecosystem services-
Blue economy-
Climate change and flood risk management-
Climate smart agriculture-
Coastal management-
Droughts and water scarcity-
Environmental flows-
Eutrophication-
Food, water, energy nexus-
Groundwater management-
Hydropower generation-
Hydrological risks and uncertainties-
Marine resources-
Nature-based solutions-
Resource recovery-
River restoration-
Storm water harvesting-
Transboundary water allocation-
Urban water management-
Wastewater treatment-
Watershed management-
Water health risks-
Water pollution-
Water quality management-
Water security-
Water stress-
Water technology innovation.