Local therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma of the bladder and/or prostate without nodal or metastatic spread during the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS2005 study

Naima Smeulders , Florent Guerin , Mark N. Gaze , Timothy Rogers , Sheila Terwisscha van Scheltinga , Federica De Corti , Julia Chisholm , Olga Slater , Veronique Minard-Colin , Beatrice Coppadoro , Ilaria Zanetti , Ross Craigie , Gabriela Guillen Burrieza , Patrizia Dall'Igna , Raquel Davila Fajardo , Pei S. Lim , Cyrus Chargari , Sophie Espenel , Ana L. Luis Huertas , Alexander Cho , Helene Martelli
{"title":"Local therapy for rhabdomyosarcoma of the bladder and/or prostate without nodal or metastatic spread during the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG) RMS2005 study","authors":"Naima Smeulders ,&nbsp;Florent Guerin ,&nbsp;Mark N. Gaze ,&nbsp;Timothy Rogers ,&nbsp;Sheila Terwisscha van Scheltinga ,&nbsp;Federica De Corti ,&nbsp;Julia Chisholm ,&nbsp;Olga Slater ,&nbsp;Veronique Minard-Colin ,&nbsp;Beatrice Coppadoro ,&nbsp;Ilaria Zanetti ,&nbsp;Ross Craigie ,&nbsp;Gabriela Guillen Burrieza ,&nbsp;Patrizia Dall'Igna ,&nbsp;Raquel Davila Fajardo ,&nbsp;Pei S. Lim ,&nbsp;Cyrus Chargari ,&nbsp;Sophie Espenel ,&nbsp;Ana L. Luis Huertas ,&nbsp;Alexander Cho ,&nbsp;Helene Martelli","doi":"10.1016/j.ejcped.2025.100313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>During the EpSSG RMS2005 trial, organ-sparing surgery (OSS) with brachytherapy (BT) became the local therapy (LT) of choice for selected patients with bladder-prostate rhabdomyosarcoma (BP-RMS). We compare this LT technique with surgical resection and/or external-beam radiotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with BP-RMS without nodal or metastatic spread enrolled in RMS2005 were categorized by their LT, differentiating OSS from organ-depleting surgery (ODS) and BT from external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Progressive disease, relapse or death were considered events for progression-free survival (PFS) and all deaths for overall survival (OS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The cohort comprised 176 patients, aged 10days-21.8years (median 2.5years). Median follow-up was 6.5years (22months-12.5years): 5year-PFS was 80.3 % (95 %CI:73.6–85.5 %); 5year-OS was 90.7 % (95 %CI:85.3–94.2 %).</div><div>Patients selected for surgery alone or BT with/without OSS (BT+/-OSS) differed significantly in age, tumour size and location from those offered EBRT alone or any other surgery and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, 5year-PFS was similar for the LT groups. However, 5year-OS differed significantly, being highest in patients suitable for surgery alone (100 %; by ODS in 55 %) or BT+ /-OSS (98.1 %; 95 %CI:87.4–99.7 %). Patients with local tumour progression/relapse after EBRT failed salvage: 5year-OS was 81.8 % (95 %CI:58.5–92.8 %) for EBRT alone and 85.3 % (95 %CI:71.6–92.7 %) for surgery and radiotherapy.</div><div>Postponing LT until after chemotherapy cycle 7 did not significantly impact 5year-PFS or OS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The risk of events was similar for different LT modalities; poor salvage after EBRT significantly reduced 5year-OS. Although not feasible for all, BT+ /-OSS offers an excellent prospect of cure, the best chance of organ retention while avoiding EBRT, and may be delayed for chemotherapy responsive tumours.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94314,"journal":{"name":"EJC paediatric oncology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100313"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJC paediatric oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772610X25001023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

During the EpSSG RMS2005 trial, organ-sparing surgery (OSS) with brachytherapy (BT) became the local therapy (LT) of choice for selected patients with bladder-prostate rhabdomyosarcoma (BP-RMS). We compare this LT technique with surgical resection and/or external-beam radiotherapy.

Methods

Patients with BP-RMS without nodal or metastatic spread enrolled in RMS2005 were categorized by their LT, differentiating OSS from organ-depleting surgery (ODS) and BT from external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Progressive disease, relapse or death were considered events for progression-free survival (PFS) and all deaths for overall survival (OS).

Results

The cohort comprised 176 patients, aged 10days-21.8years (median 2.5years). Median follow-up was 6.5years (22months-12.5years): 5year-PFS was 80.3 % (95 %CI:73.6–85.5 %); 5year-OS was 90.7 % (95 %CI:85.3–94.2 %).
Patients selected for surgery alone or BT with/without OSS (BT+/-OSS) differed significantly in age, tumour size and location from those offered EBRT alone or any other surgery and radiotherapy. Nevertheless, 5year-PFS was similar for the LT groups. However, 5year-OS differed significantly, being highest in patients suitable for surgery alone (100 %; by ODS in 55 %) or BT+ /-OSS (98.1 %; 95 %CI:87.4–99.7 %). Patients with local tumour progression/relapse after EBRT failed salvage: 5year-OS was 81.8 % (95 %CI:58.5–92.8 %) for EBRT alone and 85.3 % (95 %CI:71.6–92.7 %) for surgery and radiotherapy.
Postponing LT until after chemotherapy cycle 7 did not significantly impact 5year-PFS or OS.

Conclusions

The risk of events was similar for different LT modalities; poor salvage after EBRT significantly reduced 5year-OS. Although not feasible for all, BT+ /-OSS offers an excellent prospect of cure, the best chance of organ retention while avoiding EBRT, and may be delayed for chemotherapy responsive tumours.
在欧洲儿科软组织肉瘤研究组(EpSSG) RMS2005研究中,膀胱和/或前列腺横纹肌肉瘤的局部治疗无淋巴结或转移性扩散
在EpSSG RMS2005试验中,器官保留手术(OSS)与近距离治疗(BT)成为膀胱-前列腺横纹肌肉瘤(BP-RMS)患者的局部治疗(LT)选择。我们将这种LT技术与手术切除和/或外束放疗进行比较。方法纳入RMS2005的无淋巴结或转移性扩散BP-RMS患者根据其LT进行分类,将OSS与器官消耗手术(ODS)区分开来,将BT与外束放疗(EBRT)区分开来。疾病进展、复发或死亡被认为是无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的所有死亡事件。结果该队列包括176例患者,年龄10天-21.8岁(中位2.5岁)。中位随访时间为6.5年(22个月-12.5年):5年pfs为80.3 %(95 %CI: 73.6-85.5 %);5年os为90.7 %(95 %CI: 85.3-94.2 %)。选择单独手术或BT合并/不合并OSS (BT+/-OSS)的患者与单独接受EBRT或任何其他手术和放疗的患者在年龄、肿瘤大小和位置上有显著差异。然而,LT组的5年pfs相似。然而,5年os差异显著,适合单独手术的患者最高(100% %;通过ODS(55% %)或BT+ /-OSS(98.1% %;95 %置信区间:87.4—-99.7 %)。EBRT挽救失败后局部肿瘤进展/复发的患者:单独EBRT的5年os为81.8 %(95 %CI: 58.5-92.8 %),手术和放疗的5年os为85.3 %(95 %CI: 71.6-92.7 %)。将LT推迟到化疗周期7之后,对5年pfs或OS没有显著影响。结论:不同肝移植方式的事件风险相似;EBRT后抢救不良显著降低了5年生存率。虽然并非对所有人都可行,但BT+ /-OSS提供了极好的治疗前景,在避免EBRT的同时保留器官的最佳机会,并且可能延迟化疗反应性肿瘤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信