Novel application of machine learning to enhance untrained and inexperienced evaluators’ diagnosis of acute pain in pigs

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Beatriz Granetti Peres , Marcela Carneiro de Oliveira , Giovana Mancilla Pivato , Gustavo Venâncio da Silva , Ana Lucélia de Araújo , Fábio Augusto Da Silva Esposto , Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia , Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna , Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade
{"title":"Novel application of machine learning to enhance untrained and inexperienced evaluators’ diagnosis of acute pain in pigs","authors":"Beatriz Granetti Peres ,&nbsp;Marcela Carneiro de Oliveira ,&nbsp;Giovana Mancilla Pivato ,&nbsp;Gustavo Venâncio da Silva ,&nbsp;Ana Lucélia de Araújo ,&nbsp;Fábio Augusto Da Silva Esposto ,&nbsp;Monique Danielle Pairis-Garcia ,&nbsp;Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna ,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurately identifying pain is a critical first step required to adequately mitigate pain and improve pig health, welfare and quality of life. The objective of this study was to verify whether random forest and support vector machine algorithms trained utilizing experienced evaluators could improve the accuracy of pain diagnosis in untrained and inexperienced evaluators using the Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS). Four-minute, pre-recorded video clips of 45 male pigs in pain-free (pre-surgical castration) and painful conditions (post-surgical castration) were used. Previously generated scores from three experienced evaluators using UPAPS on a video database were used to train and test random forest and support vector machine models. Following this, ten inexperienced evaluators were recruited to assess the same video clips using the UPAPS. Scores from inexperienced evaluators were then inputted for machine learning algorithms and pain diagnosis was adjusted accordingly. Both machine learning models performed well based on area under the curve, sensitivity &gt; 90 %, and specificity &gt; 95 %. Area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of untrained inexperience evaluators were statistically (p &lt; 0.05) equivalent between the original UPAPS, and UPAPS adjusted by random forest and support vector machine. In conclusion, the random forest and support vector machine algorithms trained using experienced evaluators did not modify the discriminatory diagnostic ability of untrained inexperienced evaluators scoring UPAPS. In future studies, additional machine learning techniques could be implemented to investigate whether they improve the accuracy of pain diagnostic. In addition, further studies are needed to develop a concise and standard training program for inexperienced evaluators and investigate its effects on the accuracy of pain diagnosis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106764"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016815912500262X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurately identifying pain is a critical first step required to adequately mitigate pain and improve pig health, welfare and quality of life. The objective of this study was to verify whether random forest and support vector machine algorithms trained utilizing experienced evaluators could improve the accuracy of pain diagnosis in untrained and inexperienced evaluators using the Unesp-Botucatu Pig Composite Acute Pain Scale (UPAPS). Four-minute, pre-recorded video clips of 45 male pigs in pain-free (pre-surgical castration) and painful conditions (post-surgical castration) were used. Previously generated scores from three experienced evaluators using UPAPS on a video database were used to train and test random forest and support vector machine models. Following this, ten inexperienced evaluators were recruited to assess the same video clips using the UPAPS. Scores from inexperienced evaluators were then inputted for machine learning algorithms and pain diagnosis was adjusted accordingly. Both machine learning models performed well based on area under the curve, sensitivity > 90 %, and specificity > 95 %. Area under the curve, specificity, and sensitivity of untrained inexperience evaluators were statistically (p < 0.05) equivalent between the original UPAPS, and UPAPS adjusted by random forest and support vector machine. In conclusion, the random forest and support vector machine algorithms trained using experienced evaluators did not modify the discriminatory diagnostic ability of untrained inexperienced evaluators scoring UPAPS. In future studies, additional machine learning techniques could be implemented to investigate whether they improve the accuracy of pain diagnostic. In addition, further studies are needed to develop a concise and standard training program for inexperienced evaluators and investigate its effects on the accuracy of pain diagnosis.
机器学习的新应用,以提高未经训练和没有经验的评估者对猪急性疼痛的诊断
准确识别疼痛是充分减轻疼痛和改善猪的健康、福利和生活质量所需的关键的第一步。本研究的目的是验证随机森林和支持向量机算法是否可以提高未经训练和没有经验的评估者使用Unesp-Botucatu猪复合急性疼痛量表(UPAPS)进行疼痛诊断的准确性。使用了45头无痛(手术前阉割)和疼痛(手术后阉割)状态的雄性猪的四分钟预先录制的视频片段。先前由三位经验丰富的评估人员使用视频数据库上的UPAPS生成的分数用于训练和测试随机森林和支持向量机模型。在此之后,征聘了10名没有经验的评价人员,使用UPAPS评价相同的录象片段。然后将缺乏经验的评估者的分数输入机器学习算法,并相应地调整疼痛诊断。基于曲线下面积、灵敏度>; 90 %和特异性>; 95 %,两种机器学习模型都表现良好。未经训练的无经验评估者的曲线下面积、特异性和敏感性在原始UPAPS与随机森林和支持向量机调整的UPAPS之间具有统计学意义(p <; 0.05)相等。综上所述,由经验丰富的评估者训练的随机森林和支持向量机算法并没有改变未经训练的经验不足的评估者对UPAPS评分的歧视性诊断能力。在未来的研究中,可以实施额外的机器学习技术来研究它们是否提高了疼痛诊断的准确性。此外,还需要进一步的研究,为缺乏经验的评估人员制定一个简明和标准的培训计划,并调查其对疼痛诊断准确性的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信