[Importance of emergency temporary external fixation for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures : A 10-year retrospective analysis from a university level 1 trauma center].

Claas Neidlein, Daniel P Berthold, Felix Winden, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Wolfgang Böcker, Julian Fürmetz, Markus Bormann
{"title":"[Importance of emergency temporary external fixation for bicondylar tibial plateau fractures : A 10-year retrospective analysis from a university level 1 trauma center].","authors":"Claas Neidlein, Daniel P Berthold, Felix Winden, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Wolfgang Böcker, Julian Fürmetz, Markus Bormann","doi":"10.1007/s00113-025-01604-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tibial plateau fractures (TPF) have significantly increased over the last decade, with a notable proportion being bicondylar fractures. The necessity of a temporary external fixator (tEF) as an initial treatment for bicondylar TPF remains controversial, with limited data available regarding associated complications.</p><p><strong>Aim of the study: </strong>The aim of this study is to investigate the complication rates between patients with and without initial treatment using tEF in patients with bicondylar TPF.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This monocentric retrospective study analyzed the complication rates of bicondylar TPF from January 2011 to December 2020 at a university national trauma center. The bicondylar TPFs were divided into two groups based on the respective initial treatment: temporary external fixator (tEF, n = 67) and primary immobilization in brace/cast (iBC, n = 82). The complication rate was determined using univariate regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, there was no significantly increased relative risk of complications between tEF and iBC (odds ratio, OR 1.97, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.90-4.37, p = 0.069). The specific complication of a postinterventional infection, however, was significantly more frequent with the use of tEF (OR 5.11, 95% CI 1.27-29.88, p = 0.01) but the use of tEF was not associated with an impaired range of motion (ROM).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The overall postoperative complication rate for tibial plateau fractures is not influenced by the initial treatment with a temporary external fixator or a brace/cast. The decision for a tEF should be made individually and based on clear indications. The higher infection rate in patients with tEF represents a risk that must be considered in the context of potential bias related to more complex soft tissue and bone injuries as well as multiple injuries. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and provide further analysis to improve clinical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":75280,"journal":{"name":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-025-01604-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tibial plateau fractures (TPF) have significantly increased over the last decade, with a notable proportion being bicondylar fractures. The necessity of a temporary external fixator (tEF) as an initial treatment for bicondylar TPF remains controversial, with limited data available regarding associated complications.

Aim of the study: The aim of this study is to investigate the complication rates between patients with and without initial treatment using tEF in patients with bicondylar TPF.

Material and methods: This monocentric retrospective study analyzed the complication rates of bicondylar TPF from January 2011 to December 2020 at a university national trauma center. The bicondylar TPFs were divided into two groups based on the respective initial treatment: temporary external fixator (tEF, n = 67) and primary immobilization in brace/cast (iBC, n = 82). The complication rate was determined using univariate regression analysis.

Results: Overall, there was no significantly increased relative risk of complications between tEF and iBC (odds ratio, OR 1.97, 95% confidence interval, CI 0.90-4.37, p = 0.069). The specific complication of a postinterventional infection, however, was significantly more frequent with the use of tEF (OR 5.11, 95% CI 1.27-29.88, p = 0.01) but the use of tEF was not associated with an impaired range of motion (ROM).

Discussion: The overall postoperative complication rate for tibial plateau fractures is not influenced by the initial treatment with a temporary external fixator or a brace/cast. The decision for a tEF should be made individually and based on clear indications. The higher infection rate in patients with tEF represents a risk that must be considered in the context of potential bias related to more complex soft tissue and bone injuries as well as multiple injuries. Further studies are needed to validate these findings and provide further analysis to improve clinical decision making.

[紧急临时外固定治疗胫骨平台双髁骨折的重要性:一所大学一级创伤中心的10年回顾性分析]。
背景:胫骨平台骨折(TPF)在过去十年中显著增加,其中双髁骨折占显著比例。临时外固定架(tEF)作为双髁TPF初始治疗的必要性仍然存在争议,有关相关并发症的数据有限。研究目的:本研究的目的是探讨双髁TPF患者接受和未接受tEF初始治疗的并发症发生率。材料和方法:本单中心回顾性研究分析了2011年1月至2020年12月在某大学国家创伤中心进行的双髁TPF并发症发生率。双髁TPFs根据各自的初始治疗分为两组:临时外固定架(tEF, n = 67)和支具/石膏固定(iBC, n = 82)。采用单因素回归分析确定并发症发生率。结果:总体而言,tEF和iBC之间并发症的相对风险没有显著增加(优势比,OR 1.97, 95%可信区间,CI 0.90-4.37, p = 0.069)。然而,使用tEF的介入后感染的特定并发症明显更频繁(OR 5.11, 95% CI 1.27-29.88, p = 0.01),但使用tEF与活动范围受损(ROM)无关。讨论:胫骨平台骨折的总体术后并发症发生率不受临时外固定架或支具/石膏的初始治疗的影响。应该根据明确的适应症单独决定是否设立tEF。tEF患者较高的感染率代表了一种风险,必须在与更复杂的软组织和骨骼损伤以及多重损伤相关的潜在偏倚背景下加以考虑。需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现,并提供进一步的分析来改善临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信