Voluntary assisted dying-Australia in an international context.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q1 LAW
Katrine Del Villar, Lindy Willmott, Ben P White
{"title":"Voluntary assisted dying-Australia in an international context.","authors":"Katrine Del Villar, Lindy Willmott, Ben P White","doi":"10.1093/medlaw/fwaf025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since 2017, highly prescriptive voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws have been adopted in all Australian states and one self-governing territory. The unique features of the Australian model and salient differences between Australian states and territories are poorly understood internationally. In this article, we provide an overview of the distinctive features of the Australian model of VAD and engage in a detailed comparison with legislation regulating assisted dying or euthanasia in other jurisdictions. We focus on variations in the eligibility criteria for accessing VAD, the request and assessment process, and the permitted method/s of administration. We also consider different international regimes permitting conscientious objection and regulating institutional objection to participating in VAD. Several distinctive features of the Australian model-such as a differential timeframe to death for different medical conditions, express residency requirements, the prohibition on health practitioners initiating conversations about VAD, and legal restrictions on the availability of practitioner administration-have already served as models for other countries in enacting VAD laws. As other countries consider legalizing the practice, there is much to learn from the Australian model.</p>","PeriodicalId":49146,"journal":{"name":"Medical Law Review","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwaf025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2017, highly prescriptive voluntary assisted dying (VAD) laws have been adopted in all Australian states and one self-governing territory. The unique features of the Australian model and salient differences between Australian states and territories are poorly understood internationally. In this article, we provide an overview of the distinctive features of the Australian model of VAD and engage in a detailed comparison with legislation regulating assisted dying or euthanasia in other jurisdictions. We focus on variations in the eligibility criteria for accessing VAD, the request and assessment process, and the permitted method/s of administration. We also consider different international regimes permitting conscientious objection and regulating institutional objection to participating in VAD. Several distinctive features of the Australian model-such as a differential timeframe to death for different medical conditions, express residency requirements, the prohibition on health practitioners initiating conversations about VAD, and legal restrictions on the availability of practitioner administration-have already served as models for other countries in enacting VAD laws. As other countries consider legalizing the practice, there is much to learn from the Australian model.

Abstract Image

自愿协助死亡——国际背景下的澳大利亚。
自2017年以来,澳大利亚所有州和一个自治领土都采用了高度规范性的自愿协助死亡(VAD)法律。澳大利亚模式的独特特征以及澳大利亚各州和地区之间的显著差异在国际上知之甚少。在本文中,我们概述了澳大利亚VAD模式的特点,并与其他司法管辖区规范辅助死亡或安乐死的立法进行了详细的比较。我们将重点讨论获取VAD的资格标准、请求和评估过程以及允许的管理方法的变化。我们还考虑了不同的国际制度,允许良心反对和规范机构反对参加VAD。澳大利亚模式的几个显著特征——如不同医疗条件的不同死亡时间框架、明确的居住要求、禁止卫生从业人员发起关于VAD的对话,以及对从业人员管理的可用性的法律限制——已经成为其他国家制定VAD法律的典范。当其他国家考虑将这种做法合法化时,澳大利亚的模式有很多值得学习的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Law Review
Medical Law Review MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
50
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Law Review is established as an authoritative source of reference for academics, lawyers, legal and medical practitioners, law students, and anyone interested in healthcare and the law. The journal presents articles of international interest which provide thorough analyses and comment on the wide range of topical issues that are fundamental to this expanding area of law. In addition, commentary sections provide in depth explorations of topical aspects of the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信