Matrix WaveTM System for Mandibulo-Maxillary Fixation-Just Another Variation on the MMF Theme?-Part II: In Context to Self-Made Hybrid Erich Arch Bars and Commercial Hybrid MMF Systems-Literature Review and Analysis of Design Features.

IF 1 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2025-07-15 eCollection Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.3390/cmtr18030033
Carl-Peter Cornelius, Paris Georgios Liokatis, Timothy Doerr, Damir Matic, Stefano Fusetti, Michael Rasse, Nils Claudius Gellrich, Max Heiland, Warren Schubert, Daniel Buchbinder
{"title":"Matrix Wave<sup>TM</sup> System for Mandibulo-Maxillary Fixation-Just Another Variation on the MMF Theme?-Part II: In Context to Self-Made Hybrid Erich Arch Bars and Commercial Hybrid MMF Systems-Literature Review and Analysis of Design Features.","authors":"Carl-Peter Cornelius, Paris Georgios Liokatis, Timothy Doerr, Damir Matic, Stefano Fusetti, Michael Rasse, Nils Claudius Gellrich, Max Heiland, Warren Schubert, Daniel Buchbinder","doi":"10.3390/cmtr18030033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Trends in the utilization of Mandibulo-Maxillary Fixation (MMF) are shifting nowadays from tooth-borne devices over specialized screws to hybrid MMF devices. Hybrid MMF devices come in self-made Erich arch bar modifications and commercial hybrid MMF systems (CHMMFSs).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We survey the available technical/clinical data. Hypothetically, the risk of tooth root damage by transalveolar screws is diminished by a targeting function of the screw holes/slots.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilize a literature review and graphic displays to disclose parallels and dissimilarities in design and functionality with an in-depth look at the targeting properties.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-made hybrid arch bars have limitations to meet low-risk interradicular screw insertion sites. Technical/clinical information on CHMMFSs is unevenly distributed in favor of the SMARTLock System: positive outcome variables are increased speed of application/removal, the possibility to eliminate wiring and stick injuries and screw fixation with standoff of the embodiment along the attached gingiva. Inferred from the SMARTLock System, all four CHMMFs possess potential to effectively prevent tooth root injuries but are subject to their design features and targeting with the screw-receiving holes. The height profile and geometry shape of a CHMMFS may restrict three-dimensional spatial orientation and reach during placement. To bridge between interradicular spaces and tooth equators, where hooks or tie-up-cleats for intermaxillary cerclages should be ideally positioned under biomechanical aspects, can be problematic. The movability of their screw-receiving holes according to all six degrees of freedom differs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CHMMFSs allow simple immobilization of facial fractures involving dental occlusion. The performance in avoiding tooth root damage is a matter of design subtleties.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"18 3","pages":"33"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286215/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18030033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Trends in the utilization of Mandibulo-Maxillary Fixation (MMF) are shifting nowadays from tooth-borne devices over specialized screws to hybrid MMF devices. Hybrid MMF devices come in self-made Erich arch bar modifications and commercial hybrid MMF systems (CHMMFSs).

Objective: We survey the available technical/clinical data. Hypothetically, the risk of tooth root damage by transalveolar screws is diminished by a targeting function of the screw holes/slots.

Methods: We utilize a literature review and graphic displays to disclose parallels and dissimilarities in design and functionality with an in-depth look at the targeting properties.

Results: Self-made hybrid arch bars have limitations to meet low-risk interradicular screw insertion sites. Technical/clinical information on CHMMFSs is unevenly distributed in favor of the SMARTLock System: positive outcome variables are increased speed of application/removal, the possibility to eliminate wiring and stick injuries and screw fixation with standoff of the embodiment along the attached gingiva. Inferred from the SMARTLock System, all four CHMMFs possess potential to effectively prevent tooth root injuries but are subject to their design features and targeting with the screw-receiving holes. The height profile and geometry shape of a CHMMFS may restrict three-dimensional spatial orientation and reach during placement. To bridge between interradicular spaces and tooth equators, where hooks or tie-up-cleats for intermaxillary cerclages should be ideally positioned under biomechanical aspects, can be problematic. The movability of their screw-receiving holes according to all six degrees of freedom differs.

Conclusion: CHMMFSs allow simple immobilization of facial fractures involving dental occlusion. The performance in avoiding tooth root damage is a matter of design subtleties.

Matrix waveetm系统用于下颌-上颌固定-只是MMF主题的另一种变体?-第二部分:以自制混合型Erich拱杆和商用混合型MMF系统为背景-文献综述和设计特点分析
研究设计:下颌-上颌固定(MMF)的使用趋势正在从牙载固定装置转向混合MMF装置。混合MMF设备包括自制的Erich拱杆修改和商用混合MMF系统(CHMMFSs)。目的:调查现有的技术/临床资料。假设,通过螺钉孔/槽的靶向功能,可以降低经牙槽螺钉对牙根损伤的风险。方法:我们利用文献综述和图形显示来揭示设计和功能的相似之处和不同之处,并深入研究目标属性。结果:自制混合弓棒在低风险的根间螺钉插入部位存在局限性。关于CHMMFSs的技术/临床信息分布不均,有利于SMARTLock系统:积极的结果变量是增加了应用/移除的速度,消除电线和粘着损伤的可能性,以及在附着牙龈的实施例中进行螺钉固定。从SMARTLock系统推断,所有四种chmmf都具有有效防止牙根损伤的潜力,但受其设计特点和螺钉接收孔的目标限制。CHMMFS的高度轮廓和几何形状可能会限制三维空间取向和放置期间的到达。在根间间隙和牙齿赤道之间架起桥梁,在生物力学方面,上颌间环扎术的钩或绑扎式夹板应该理想地定位,这可能会有问题。它们的接螺孔的可动性根据所有六个自由度是不同的。结论:CHMMFSs可以简单地固定包括牙合的面部骨折。在避免牙根损伤的性能是一个微妙的设计问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书