Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Assessment Using Dual-Energy CT with Different Base Material Pairs (BMPs).

IF 2.7 Q3 IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY
Stefano Piscone, Sara Saccone, Paola Milillo, Giorgia Schiraldi, Roberta Vinci, Luca Macarini, Luca Pio Stoppino
{"title":"Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Assessment Using Dual-Energy CT with Different Base Material Pairs (BMPs).","authors":"Stefano Piscone, Sara Saccone, Paola Milillo, Giorgia Schiraldi, Roberta Vinci, Luca Macarini, Luca Pio Stoppino","doi":"10.3390/jimaging11070236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) is essential for osteoporosis diagnosis. Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is the current gold standard, but it has limitations in evaluating trabecular bone and is susceptible to different artifacts. In this study we evaluate whether Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) can be defined as an alternative method for the assessment of BMD in a sample of postmenopausal patients undergoing oncological follow-up. In this study a retrospective analysis was conducted on 41 patients who had both DECT and DXA within six months. BMD values were extracted from DECT using five different base material pairs (BMPs) and compared with DXA measurements at the femoral neck. The calcium-fat pairing showed the strongest correlation with DXA-derived BMD (Spearman's ρ = 0.797) and excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.983). There was a strong and significant association between the DXA results and the various BPM measurements. These findings support the possibility of DECT in the precise and opportunistic evaluation of BMD changes when employing particular BMPs. This study showed how this technique can be a useful and effective substitute for conventional DXA, particularly when patients are in oncological follow-up using DECT, minimizing additional radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":37035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Imaging","volume":"11 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12295864/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging11070236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMAGING SCIENCE & PHOTOGRAPHIC TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) is essential for osteoporosis diagnosis. Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) is the current gold standard, but it has limitations in evaluating trabecular bone and is susceptible to different artifacts. In this study we evaluate whether Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) can be defined as an alternative method for the assessment of BMD in a sample of postmenopausal patients undergoing oncological follow-up. In this study a retrospective analysis was conducted on 41 patients who had both DECT and DXA within six months. BMD values were extracted from DECT using five different base material pairs (BMPs) and compared with DXA measurements at the femoral neck. The calcium-fat pairing showed the strongest correlation with DXA-derived BMD (Spearman's ρ = 0.797) and excellent reproducibility (ICC = 0.983). There was a strong and significant association between the DXA results and the various BPM measurements. These findings support the possibility of DECT in the precise and opportunistic evaluation of BMD changes when employing particular BMPs. This study showed how this technique can be a useful and effective substitute for conventional DXA, particularly when patients are in oncological follow-up using DECT, minimizing additional radiation exposure.

不同基材对(BMPs)双能CT评估骨矿物质密度(BMD)。
骨矿物质密度(BMD)的评估对骨质疏松症的诊断至关重要。双能x线吸收仪(DXA)是目前的金标准,但它在评估小梁骨方面有局限性,并且容易受到不同的伪影的影响。在这项研究中,我们评估了双能计算机断层扫描(DECT)是否可以作为一种替代方法来评估绝经后接受肿瘤随访的患者的骨密度。本研究对41例6个月内同时行DECT和DXA的患者进行回顾性分析。使用五种不同的基础材料对(BMPs)从DECT中提取骨密度值,并与股骨颈的DXA测量值进行比较。钙-脂肪配对与dxa衍生的骨密度相关性最强(Spearman ρ = 0.797),重复性好(ICC = 0.983)。DXA结果与各种BPM测量之间存在强烈而重要的关联。这些发现支持了当使用特定的BMPs时,DECT在精确和机会性评估BMD变化方面的可能性。这项研究表明,这项技术如何成为传统DXA的有用和有效的替代品,特别是当患者在使用DECT进行肿瘤随访时,最大限度地减少了额外的辐射暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Imaging
Journal of Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
303
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信