Ákos Sudár, Tamás Pócza, Richárd Elek, Tibor Major, Ádám Domonkos Tárnoki, Dávid László Tárnoki, Csilla Pesznyák
{"title":"Expansion of applicability of multiple scan average dose measurements for CT dosimetry.","authors":"Ákos Sudár, Tamás Pócza, Richárd Elek, Tibor Major, Ádám Domonkos Tárnoki, Dávid László Tárnoki, Csilla Pesznyák","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/adf40d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>The CT dose index (CTDI) can be directly measured only for axial scan protocols; however, these days, helical protocols are applied in most cases, and sometimes axial protocols are not even available. The multiple scan average dose (MSAD) method can address this issue, but it is not widely adopted. This article aims to support the appropriateness of the MSAD method first by showing that it is measurable with the CTDI tools, and second by presenting a simple rule for scan pitch to avoid the main uncertainty of the measurement.<i>Approach.</i>Monte Carlo simulation was combined with its analytical postprocessing to accurately calculate scattering and speed up calculations to investigate several imaging and beam parameter combinations. The calculations were validated by measurements, and the model was used to examine the uncertainty of MSAD caused by an uncontrolled parameter.<i>Main results.</i>The widespread 150 mm long CTDI phantom and the 100 mm long ionization chamber are applicable for the MSAD method and reach80.8±0.2% efficiency in the estimation of CTDI<sub>vol</sub>, in contrast to78.0±0.3% efficiency of the CTDI<sub>100</sub>method. By utilizing the periodicity of the MSAD measurement, the uncertainty can be reduced to1.38±0.02% in contrast to26.85±0.16% in the worst case.<i>Significance.</i>The MSAD measurement with the CTDI setup is slightly more efficient than the CTDI<sub>100</sub>measurement protocol, so there is no need for a long phantom or farmer chamber to use MSAD in quality assurance (QA) measurements. The MSAD applies to both helical and axial scans; therefore, we recommend using direct MSAD measurement for QA in the clinical environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/adf40d","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective.The CT dose index (CTDI) can be directly measured only for axial scan protocols; however, these days, helical protocols are applied in most cases, and sometimes axial protocols are not even available. The multiple scan average dose (MSAD) method can address this issue, but it is not widely adopted. This article aims to support the appropriateness of the MSAD method first by showing that it is measurable with the CTDI tools, and second by presenting a simple rule for scan pitch to avoid the main uncertainty of the measurement.Approach.Monte Carlo simulation was combined with its analytical postprocessing to accurately calculate scattering and speed up calculations to investigate several imaging and beam parameter combinations. The calculations were validated by measurements, and the model was used to examine the uncertainty of MSAD caused by an uncontrolled parameter.Main results.The widespread 150 mm long CTDI phantom and the 100 mm long ionization chamber are applicable for the MSAD method and reach80.8±0.2% efficiency in the estimation of CTDIvol, in contrast to78.0±0.3% efficiency of the CTDI100method. By utilizing the periodicity of the MSAD measurement, the uncertainty can be reduced to1.38±0.02% in contrast to26.85±0.16% in the worst case.Significance.The MSAD measurement with the CTDI setup is slightly more efficient than the CTDI100measurement protocol, so there is no need for a long phantom or farmer chamber to use MSAD in quality assurance (QA) measurements. The MSAD applies to both helical and axial scans; therefore, we recommend using direct MSAD measurement for QA in the clinical environment.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry