Isla Williams, Andrea Phillipou, Elsdon Storey, Peter Brotchie, Larry Abel
{"title":"Visual Perception and Fixation Patterns in an Individual with Ventral Simultanagnosia, Integrative Agnosia and Bilateral Visual Field Loss.","authors":"Isla Williams, Andrea Phillipou, Elsdon Storey, Peter Brotchie, Larry Abel","doi":"10.3390/neurolint17070105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>As high-acuity vision is limited to a very small visual angle, examination of a scene requires multiple fixations. Simultanagnosia, a disorder wherein elements of a scene can be perceived correctly but cannot be integrated into a coherent whole, has been parsed into dorsal and ventral forms. In ventral simultanagnosia, limited visual integration is possible. This case study was the first to record gaze during the presentation of a series of visual stimuli, which required the processing of local and global elements. We hypothesised that gaze patterns would differ with successful processing and that feature integration could be disrupted by distractors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The patient received a neuropsychological assessment and underwent CT and MRI. Eye movements were recorded during the following tasks: (1) famous face identification, (2) facial emotion recognition, (3) identification of Ishihara colour plates, and (4) identification of both local and global letters in Navon composite letters, presented either alone or surrounded by filled black circles, which we hypothesised would impair global processing by disrupting fixation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The patients identified no famous faces but scanned them qualitatively normally. The only emotion to be consistently recognised was happiness, whose scanpath differed from the other emotions. She identified none of the Ishihara plates, although her colour vision was normal on the FM-15, even mapping an unseen digit with fixations and tracing it with her finger. For plain Navon figures, she correctly identified 20/20 local and global letters; for the \"dotted\" figures, she was correct 19/20 times for local letters and 0/20 for global letters (chi-squared NS for local, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, global), with similar fixation of salient elements for both.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to our hypothesis, gaze behaviour was largely independent of the ability to process global stimuli, showing for the first time that normal acquisition of visual information did not ensure its integration into a percept. The core defect lay in processing, not acquisition. In the novel Navon task, adding distractors abolished feature integration without affecting the fixation of the salient elements, confirming for the first time that distractors could disrupt the processing, not the acquisition, of visual information in this disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":19130,"journal":{"name":"Neurology International","volume":"17 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12299405/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint17070105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives: As high-acuity vision is limited to a very small visual angle, examination of a scene requires multiple fixations. Simultanagnosia, a disorder wherein elements of a scene can be perceived correctly but cannot be integrated into a coherent whole, has been parsed into dorsal and ventral forms. In ventral simultanagnosia, limited visual integration is possible. This case study was the first to record gaze during the presentation of a series of visual stimuli, which required the processing of local and global elements. We hypothesised that gaze patterns would differ with successful processing and that feature integration could be disrupted by distractors.
Methods: The patient received a neuropsychological assessment and underwent CT and MRI. Eye movements were recorded during the following tasks: (1) famous face identification, (2) facial emotion recognition, (3) identification of Ishihara colour plates, and (4) identification of both local and global letters in Navon composite letters, presented either alone or surrounded by filled black circles, which we hypothesised would impair global processing by disrupting fixation.
Results: The patients identified no famous faces but scanned them qualitatively normally. The only emotion to be consistently recognised was happiness, whose scanpath differed from the other emotions. She identified none of the Ishihara plates, although her colour vision was normal on the FM-15, even mapping an unseen digit with fixations and tracing it with her finger. For plain Navon figures, she correctly identified 20/20 local and global letters; for the "dotted" figures, she was correct 19/20 times for local letters and 0/20 for global letters (chi-squared NS for local, p < 0.0001, global), with similar fixation of salient elements for both.
Conclusions: Contrary to our hypothesis, gaze behaviour was largely independent of the ability to process global stimuli, showing for the first time that normal acquisition of visual information did not ensure its integration into a percept. The core defect lay in processing, not acquisition. In the novel Navon task, adding distractors abolished feature integration without affecting the fixation of the salient elements, confirming for the first time that distractors could disrupt the processing, not the acquisition, of visual information in this disorder.
背景/物镜:由于高敏锐度的视力局限于一个非常小的视角,检查一个场景需要多次注视。同时失认症是一种障碍,其中场景的元素可以被正确地感知,但不能整合成一个连贯的整体,已经被解析为背侧和腹侧形式。在腹侧同时失认症中,有限的视觉整合是可能的。本案例研究首次记录了在呈现一系列视觉刺激时的凝视,这需要处理局部和全局元素。我们假设注视模式会因成功处理而有所不同,并且特征整合可能会被干扰物打断。方法:对患者进行神经心理评估,并行CT、MRI检查。在以下任务中记录眼球运动:(1)识别名人面孔;(2)识别面部情绪;(3)识别石原色板;(4)识别纳文复合字母中的局部和全局字母,单独呈现或被填充的黑圈包围,我们假设黑圈会干扰注视,从而损害全局处理。结果:患者没有识别出名人面孔,但定性扫描正常。唯一被持续识别的情绪是快乐,它的扫描路径与其他情绪不同。她没有辨认出石原的任何一幅版画,尽管她在FM-15上的色彩视觉是正常的,甚至可以用注视画出一个看不见的手指,并用手指追踪它。对于普通的纳文数字,她正确地识别了20/20个本地和全球字母;对于“点”图,她对局部字母的正确率为19/20,对全局字母的正确率为0/20(局部的卡方NS, p < 0.0001,全局),两者的显著元素固定相似。结论:与我们的假设相反,凝视行为在很大程度上独立于处理全局刺激的能力,这首次表明正常的视觉信息获取并不能确保其整合到感知中。核心缺陷在于处理,而不是获取。在新的Navon任务中,添加干扰物消除了特征整合,但不影响对显著元素的固定,这首次证实了干扰物可以破坏这种障碍中视觉信息的加工,而不是获取。