Enhanced anatomical accuracy in arthroscopic all-inside lateral ligament repair using ultrasound-guided anchor placement.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Younguk Park, DaeHyun Han, Myungsub Lee, Young Wook Seo
{"title":"Enhanced anatomical accuracy in arthroscopic all-inside lateral ligament repair using ultrasound-guided anchor placement.","authors":"Younguk Park, DaeHyun Han, Myungsub Lee, Young Wook Seo","doi":"10.1016/j.jos.2025.06.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With significant advancements in arthroscopic surgical techniques, the frequency of arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament repair procedures has increased. However, anchor positioning accuracy remains uncertain, with studies suggesting a higher probability of the anchor being fixed in non-anatomical positions, such as insertion proximal to the fibular obscure tubercle (FOT). Using ultrasound guidance, anchors can be positioned more anatomically. This study aimed to analyze anchor position in arthroscopic all-inside lateral ligament repair using ultrasound.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-three patients with chronic ankle instability were prospectively enrolled and underwent ultrasound-guided, arthroscopic all-inside lateral ankle ligament repair, termed Arthroscopic Ultrasound-Assisted All-Inside Repair of the Lateral Ankle Ligament (AURA). Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were taken to analyze anchor positions, with the FOT as the reference point. Subsequently, the anchor positions were classified as anatomic, sub-anatomic, and nonanatomic based on the relationship between the fibular anterior tubercle and the FOT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean distance between anchor position and the fibular obscure tubercle (FOT) was 2.08 mm (range, 0-12 mm). Based on postoperative CT analysis, anchor placements were classified relative to the FOT: 28 of 33 cases (84.8 %) were within 25 % of the fibular length distal to the FOT (anatomic zone), 4 cases (12.2 %) were positioned between 25-50 % (sub-anatomic zone), and 1 case (3.0 %) was beyond 50 % (non-anatomic zone).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ultrasound-assisted technique demonstrated high anatomical accuracy in anchor placement, as confirmed by postoperative 3D-CT evaluation.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, case study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16939,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2025.06.015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With significant advancements in arthroscopic surgical techniques, the frequency of arthroscopic lateral ankle ligament repair procedures has increased. However, anchor positioning accuracy remains uncertain, with studies suggesting a higher probability of the anchor being fixed in non-anatomical positions, such as insertion proximal to the fibular obscure tubercle (FOT). Using ultrasound guidance, anchors can be positioned more anatomically. This study aimed to analyze anchor position in arthroscopic all-inside lateral ligament repair using ultrasound.

Methods: Thirty-three patients with chronic ankle instability were prospectively enrolled and underwent ultrasound-guided, arthroscopic all-inside lateral ankle ligament repair, termed Arthroscopic Ultrasound-Assisted All-Inside Repair of the Lateral Ankle Ligament (AURA). Postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were taken to analyze anchor positions, with the FOT as the reference point. Subsequently, the anchor positions were classified as anatomic, sub-anatomic, and nonanatomic based on the relationship between the fibular anterior tubercle and the FOT.

Results: The mean distance between anchor position and the fibular obscure tubercle (FOT) was 2.08 mm (range, 0-12 mm). Based on postoperative CT analysis, anchor placements were classified relative to the FOT: 28 of 33 cases (84.8 %) were within 25 % of the fibular length distal to the FOT (anatomic zone), 4 cases (12.2 %) were positioned between 25-50 % (sub-anatomic zone), and 1 case (3.0 %) was beyond 50 % (non-anatomic zone).

Conclusion: The ultrasound-assisted technique demonstrated high anatomical accuracy in anchor placement, as confirmed by postoperative 3D-CT evaluation.

Level of evidence: IV, case study.

超声引导下锚钉放置在关节镜下全内外侧韧带修复中的解剖学准确性提高。
背景:随着关节镜手术技术的显著进步,关节镜下踝关节外侧韧带修复手术的频率有所增加。然而,锚点定位的准确性仍然不确定,研究表明锚点在非解剖位置固定的可能性更高,例如在腓骨隐匿结节(FOT)近端插入。在超声引导下,锚点的定位更符合解剖结构。本研究旨在分析关节镜下全内外侧韧带超声修复中的锚定位置。方法:前瞻性纳入33例慢性踝关节不稳定患者,接受超声引导下关节镜全内踝外侧韧带修复,称为关节镜超声辅助全内踝外侧韧带修复(AURA)。术后计算机断层扫描(CT)分析锚点位置,以FOT为参考点。随后,根据腓骨前结节与FOT之间的关系,将锚定位置分为解剖、亚解剖和非解剖。结果:固定位置距腓骨隐匿结节(FOT)平均距离为2.08 mm(范围0 ~ 12 mm)。根据术后CT分析,锚点放置位置相对于FOT进行分类:33例中28例(84.8%)位于FOT远端腓骨长度的25%以内(解剖区),4例(12.2%)位于25- 50%(亚解剖区)之间,1例(3.0%)位于超过50%(非解剖区)。结论:经术后3D-CT评估,超声辅助技术在锚点放置方面具有较高的解剖学准确性。证据等级:IV,案例研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Science
Journal of Orthopaedic Science 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
290
审稿时长
90 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Science is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. The journal publishes the latest researches and topical debates in all fields of clinical and experimental orthopaedics, including musculoskeletal medicine, sports medicine, locomotive syndrome, trauma, paediatrics, oncology and biomaterials, as well as basic researches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信