Effects and neural mechanisms of a brain-computer interface-controlled soft robotic glove on upper limb function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled fNIRS study.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Xiang Ji, Xia Lu, Yi Xu, Wenbin Zhang, Han Yang, Chenghui Yin, Hewei Wang, Caili Ren, Yingying Ji, Yongqiang Li, Guilan Huang, Ying Shen
{"title":"Effects and neural mechanisms of a brain-computer interface-controlled soft robotic glove on upper limb function in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled fNIRS study.","authors":"Xiang Ji, Xia Lu, Yi Xu, Wenbin Zhang, Han Yang, Chenghui Yin, Hewei Wang, Caili Ren, Yingying Ji, Yongqiang Li, Guilan Huang, Ying Shen","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01704-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The brain-computer interface-based soft robotic glove (BCI-SRG) holds promise for upper limb rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients, yet its efficacy and neural mechanisms are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects and neural mechanisms of BCI-SRGs by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty subacute stroke patients with left-sided hemiparesis were randomized into the BCI-SRG (n = 20) and soft robotic glove (SRG) (n = 20) groups. Both groups received 20 sessions of intervention over 4 weeks in addition to conventional rehabilitation. The BCI-SRG group was trained using a soft robotic glove controlled by a brain‒computer interface (BCI), whereas the SRG group used the same soft robotic glove without BCI control. The clinical outcomes included the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb (FMA-UL), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores. In addition, fNIRS was used to explore potential clinical brain mechanisms. All assessments were performed before treatment and after 4 weeks of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 39 participants completed the intervention and clinical assessments (BCI-SRG: n = 20; SRG: n = 19). Compared with the SRG group, the BCI-SRG group showed greater improvements in the ARAT (Z = - 2.139, P = 0.032) and FMA-UL (Z = - 2.588, P = 0.010), with no notable difference in the MBI (Z = - 1.843, P = 0.065). fNIRS data were available for 35 participants (BCI-SRG: n = 17; SRG: n = 18). Within-group comparisons revealed significant postintervention increases in cortical activation in the bilateral sensorimotor cortex (SMC) and medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) in the BCI-SRG group, whereas no significant changes were observed in the SRG group. Between-group comparisons further revealed significantly greater changes in HbO concentrations in the BCI-SRG group than in the SRG group across the same cortical regions. Moreover, changes in prefrontal activation (post-pre) were positively correlated with improvements in ARAT scores, with significant correlations observed in the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC) (Ch9, r = 0.592, P = 0.012; Ch25, r = 0.488, P = 0.047) and right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPFC) (Ch19, r = 0.671, P = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BCI-SRG training significantly enhances upper limb function and facilitates bilateral motor and sensory cortical reorganization. PFC activation is correlated with functional improvements, suggesting a potential mechanism underlying the benefits of rehabilitation in stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This trial was registered under the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400082786) and was retrospectively registered on April 8, 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"171"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288246/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01704-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The brain-computer interface-based soft robotic glove (BCI-SRG) holds promise for upper limb rehabilitation in subacute stroke patients, yet its efficacy and neural mechanisms are unclear. This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic effects and neural mechanisms of BCI-SRGs by functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Methods: Forty subacute stroke patients with left-sided hemiparesis were randomized into the BCI-SRG (n = 20) and soft robotic glove (SRG) (n = 20) groups. Both groups received 20 sessions of intervention over 4 weeks in addition to conventional rehabilitation. The BCI-SRG group was trained using a soft robotic glove controlled by a brain‒computer interface (BCI), whereas the SRG group used the same soft robotic glove without BCI control. The clinical outcomes included the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Limb (FMA-UL), and Modified Barthel Index (MBI) scores. In addition, fNIRS was used to explore potential clinical brain mechanisms. All assessments were performed before treatment and after 4 weeks of treatment.

Results: A total of 39 participants completed the intervention and clinical assessments (BCI-SRG: n = 20; SRG: n = 19). Compared with the SRG group, the BCI-SRG group showed greater improvements in the ARAT (Z = - 2.139, P = 0.032) and FMA-UL (Z = - 2.588, P = 0.010), with no notable difference in the MBI (Z = - 1.843, P = 0.065). fNIRS data were available for 35 participants (BCI-SRG: n = 17; SRG: n = 18). Within-group comparisons revealed significant postintervention increases in cortical activation in the bilateral sensorimotor cortex (SMC) and medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) in the BCI-SRG group, whereas no significant changes were observed in the SRG group. Between-group comparisons further revealed significantly greater changes in HbO concentrations in the BCI-SRG group than in the SRG group across the same cortical regions. Moreover, changes in prefrontal activation (post-pre) were positively correlated with improvements in ARAT scores, with significant correlations observed in the left dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (LDLPFC) (Ch9, r = 0.592, P = 0.012; Ch25, r = 0.488, P = 0.047) and right dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex (RDLPFC) (Ch19, r = 0.671, P = 0.003).

Conclusions: BCI-SRG training significantly enhances upper limb function and facilitates bilateral motor and sensory cortical reorganization. PFC activation is correlated with functional improvements, suggesting a potential mechanism underlying the benefits of rehabilitation in stroke patients.

Trial registration: This trial was registered under the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400082786) and was retrospectively registered on April 8, 2024.

脑机接口控制柔性机器人手套对亚急性脑卒中患者上肢功能的影响及其神经机制:随机对照fNIRS研究
背景与目的:基于脑机接口的软机器人手套(BCI-SRG)有望用于亚急性脑卒中患者的上肢康复,但其疗效和神经机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在通过功能近红外光谱(fNIRS)研究BCI-SRGs的治疗效果和神经机制。方法:将40例亚急性脑卒中左侧偏瘫患者随机分为BCI-SRG组(n = 20)和柔性机器人手套组(n = 20)。两组在常规康复的基础上,在4周内接受了20次干预。BCI-SRG组使用由脑机接口(BCI)控制的软机器人手套进行训练,而SRG组使用没有BCI控制的软机器人手套进行训练。临床结果包括动作研究臂测试(ARAT)、Fugl-Meyer上肢评估(FMA-UL)和改良Barthel指数(MBI)评分。此外,fNIRS还用于探索潜在的临床脑机制。在治疗前和治疗4周后进行所有评估。结果:共有39名参与者完成了干预和临床评估(BCI-SRG: n = 20;SRG: n = 19)。与SRG组比较,BCI-SRG组在ARAT (Z = - 2.139, P = 0.032)和FMA-UL (Z = - 2.588, P = 0.010)方面有较大改善,而MBI (Z = - 1.843, P = 0.065)差异无统计学意义。35名参与者的fNIRS数据可用(BCI-SRG: n = 17;SRG: n = 18)。组内比较显示,干预后BCI-SRG组双侧感觉运动皮层(SMC)和内侧前额叶皮层(MPFC)的皮层激活显著增加,而SRG组未观察到显著变化。组间比较进一步显示,BCI-SRG组在相同皮质区域的HbO浓度变化明显大于SRG组。此外,前额叶激活(后-前)的变化与ARAT评分的改善呈正相关,其中左背外侧前额叶皮质(LDLPFC)显著相关(Ch9, r = 0.592, P = 0.012;Ch25, r = 0.488, P = 0.047)和右背外侧前额叶皮质(RDLPFC) (Ch19, r = 0.671, P = 0.003)。结论:BCI-SRG训练可显著增强上肢功能,促进双侧运动和感觉皮层重组。PFC激活与功能改善相关,提示脑卒中患者康复益处的潜在机制。试验注册:该试验在中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2400082786)注册,并于2024年4月8日回顾性注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信