Efficacy and safety of the ustekinumab biosimilar, Bmab 1200, versus reference ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 28‑week results of the randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 STELLAR-2 study.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Jacek C Szepietowski, Adam Reich, Steven R Feldman, Grazyna Pulka, Lally Mekokishvili, Nino Tsiskarishvili, Inese Svarca, Airi Poder, Gursharan Singh, Sarika Deodhar, Kuldeep Kumar, Ashwani Marwah, Subramanian Loganathan, Sandeep N Athalye, Elena Wolff-Holz
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of the ustekinumab biosimilar, Bmab 1200, versus reference ustekinumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 28‑week results of the randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 STELLAR-2 study.","authors":"Jacek C Szepietowski, Adam Reich, Steven R Feldman, Grazyna Pulka, Lally Mekokishvili, Nino Tsiskarishvili, Inese Svarca, Airi Poder, Gursharan Singh, Sarika Deodhar, Kuldeep Kumar, Ashwani Marwah, Subramanian Loganathan, Sandeep N Athalye, Elena Wolff-Holz","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2025.2538608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>STELLAR-2 assessed the equivalent efficacy of the ustekinumab biosimilar, Bmab 1200, versus reference ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>In this double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 3 study, patients were randomized 1:1 to Bmab 1200 or reference ustekinumab in Treatment Period (TP)1, and at Week 16, those who responded to reference ustekinumab (improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] score ≥ 50%) were re-randomized (1:1) to continue reference ustekinumab or switch to Bmab 1200 in TP2. The primary endpoint was the change in PASI from baseline to Week 12. Equivalent efficacy was established if 90% and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the treatment difference were within predefined equivalence margins of ± 10% and ± 13%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 384 patients were randomized (Bmab 1200: <i>N</i> = 191; reference ustekinumab: <i>N</i> = 193) in TP1. At Week 12, the least squares mean treatment difference (0.6800%; 90% CI: -1.27, 2.63; 95% CI: -1.64, 3.00) was within the predefined equivalence margins for 90% and 95% CIs. Safety, immunogenicity, and PK were comparable between treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bmab 1200 and reference ustekinumab had similar efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and PK in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu identifier is 2021-006668-25; www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05335356.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2025.2538608","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: STELLAR-2 assessed the equivalent efficacy of the ustekinumab biosimilar, Bmab 1200, versus reference ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis. Safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics (PK) were also evaluated.

Research design and methods: In this double-blind, parallel-group, Phase 3 study, patients were randomized 1:1 to Bmab 1200 or reference ustekinumab in Treatment Period (TP)1, and at Week 16, those who responded to reference ustekinumab (improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] score ≥ 50%) were re-randomized (1:1) to continue reference ustekinumab or switch to Bmab 1200 in TP2. The primary endpoint was the change in PASI from baseline to Week 12. Equivalent efficacy was established if 90% and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the treatment difference were within predefined equivalence margins of ± 10% and ± 13%, respectively.

Results: Overall, 384 patients were randomized (Bmab 1200: N = 191; reference ustekinumab: N = 193) in TP1. At Week 12, the least squares mean treatment difference (0.6800%; 90% CI: -1.27, 2.63; 95% CI: -1.64, 3.00) was within the predefined equivalence margins for 90% and 95% CIs. Safety, immunogenicity, and PK were comparable between treatment groups.

Conclusions: Bmab 1200 and reference ustekinumab had similar efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and PK in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Trial registration: www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu identifier is 2021-006668-25; www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05335356.

ustekinumab生物类似药Bmab 1200与参考ustekinumab治疗中重度斑块性银屑病的疗效和安全性:28周随机、双盲、3期star -2研究结果
背景:STELLAR-2评估了ustekinumab生物类似药Bmab 1200与参考ustekinumab在中重度慢性斑块性银屑病患者中的等效疗效。安全性,免疫原性和药代动力学(PK)也进行了评估。研究设计和方法:在这项双盲,平行组,3期研究中,患者在治疗期(TP)1中以1:1的比例随机分配到Bmab 1200或参考ustekinumab,在第16周,那些对参考ustekinumab有反应的患者(银屑病面积和严重程度指数[PASI]评分改善≥50%)被重新随机分配(1:1)继续参考ustekinumab或切换到Bmab 1200在TP2。主要终点是PASI从基线到第12周的变化。如果治疗差异的90%和95%置信区间(ci)分别在预定的等效范围(±10%和±13%)内,则建立等效疗效。结果:总体而言,384例患者被随机分配(Bmab 1200: N = 191;参考ustekinumab: N = 193)。在第12周,最小二乘平均治疗差(0.6800%;90% ci: -1.27, 2.63;95% CI: -1.64, 3.00)在90%和95% CI的预定义等效范围内。安全性、免疫原性和PK在治疗组之间具有可比性。结论:Bmab 1200和参考ustekinumab在中重度斑块型银屑病患者中具有相似的疗效、安全性、免疫原性和PK。试验注册:www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu标识符为2021 - 006668 -25;www.clinicaltrials.gov标识符为NCT05335356。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信