Laura Ricardina Ramirez-Sotelo, Débora Costa Ruiz, Amanda Farias-Gomes, Matheus L Oliveira, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Francisco Haiter-Neto
{"title":"Influence of the battery level of a handheld X-ray device on the objective image quality of radiographs.","authors":"Laura Ricardina Ramirez-Sotelo, Débora Costa Ruiz, Amanda Farias-Gomes, Matheus L Oliveira, Deborah Queiroz Freitas, Francisco Haiter-Neto","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the influence of the battery level of a handheld X-ray device on the objective image quality of radiographs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An acrylic-block was radiographed using a SnapShot solid-state sensor and an Eagle handheld X-ray device set at 60 kVp and 0.88 mAs, with the battery at ten different levels (ranging from fully charged to 10%). Six radiographs were acquired at each level. Mean grey values and standard deviations were collected using ImageJ software to assess image brightness, noise, and uniformity. Additionally, an aluminium step-wedge was radiographed under the same conditions for contrast evaluation. Image quality parameters were compared across different battery levels using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Images obtained with a 100% battery level showed higher brightness than those at 50% (P < 0.0001); the battery level did not affect image noise (P = 0.091); uniformity at 20% battery level differed from all other levels (P < 0.0001); and contrast was highest at 90% battery compared to all other levels (P < 0.0001). Overall, the values remained consistent across different battery levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite some significant differences, the objective image quality remained stable throughout the entire battery charge cycle of the tested handheld X-ray device.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"37-42"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the influence of the battery level of a handheld X-ray device on the objective image quality of radiographs.
Methods: An acrylic-block was radiographed using a SnapShot solid-state sensor and an Eagle handheld X-ray device set at 60 kVp and 0.88 mAs, with the battery at ten different levels (ranging from fully charged to 10%). Six radiographs were acquired at each level. Mean grey values and standard deviations were collected using ImageJ software to assess image brightness, noise, and uniformity. Additionally, an aluminium step-wedge was radiographed under the same conditions for contrast evaluation. Image quality parameters were compared across different battery levels using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey's post-hoc test (α = 0.05).
Results: Images obtained with a 100% battery level showed higher brightness than those at 50% (P < 0.0001); the battery level did not affect image noise (P = 0.091); uniformity at 20% battery level differed from all other levels (P < 0.0001); and contrast was highest at 90% battery compared to all other levels (P < 0.0001). Overall, the values remained consistent across different battery levels.
Conclusions: Despite some significant differences, the objective image quality remained stable throughout the entire battery charge cycle of the tested handheld X-ray device.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X