Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in elderly and younger patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a retrospective real-world study in China.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hao Zhang, Xue-Li Ding, Yong-Hong Xu, Jun Wu, Yue-Yuan Wang, Shu-Xian Liu, Jing Yan, Hua Liu, Zi-Bin Tian, Ai-Ling Liu
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in elderly and younger patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a retrospective real-world study in China.","authors":"Hao Zhang, Xue-Li Ding, Yong-Hong Xu, Jun Wu, Yue-Yuan Wang, Shu-Xian Liu, Jing Yan, Hua Liu, Zi-Bin Tian, Ai-Ling Liu","doi":"10.1186/s12876-025-04125-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited data exist regarding the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) in China's elderly adult population with ulcerative colitis (UC) in China. In this investigation, a comparative analysis of its efficacy and safety was performed between elderly and younger adult UC cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with moderate-to-severe UC and at least three VDZ infusions at our clinic between March 2021 and November 2024 were retrospectively recruited. The elderly adult patients (≥ 60 years at first VDZ dose) were matched clinically 1:2 to younger patients (18-59 years).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 30 elderly and 60 younger adult patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding sex, body mass index, percentage of smokers, disease duration, disease extent, disease activity, Mayo endoscopic scores, extra-intestinal manifestations, perianal disease, history of bowel-related surgery, or previous and concomitant therapies. At week 6, the clinical remission and steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) rates were significantly lower (10.00% vs. 33.33%, P = 0.017; 3.33% vs. 26.67%, P = 0.005) in the elderly group than in the younger group, but there was no significant difference in the clinical response rates (P = 1.000). There was no significant difference in the clinical response, remission, and SFCR rates between the two groups at weeks 14, 22, 38, 46, and 54 (P > 0.05). The frequency of adverse events associated with VDZ was comparable between the two groups (33.33% vs. 38.33%, P = 0.643).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The efficacy and safety of VDZ in elderly and younger adult patients with UC are similar. Thus, VDZ can be considered both safe and efficacious for treating elderly adult patients with UC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"25 1","pages":"531"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-025-04125-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Limited data exist regarding the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab (VDZ) in China's elderly adult population with ulcerative colitis (UC) in China. In this investigation, a comparative analysis of its efficacy and safety was performed between elderly and younger adult UC cohorts.

Methods: Patients with moderate-to-severe UC and at least three VDZ infusions at our clinic between March 2021 and November 2024 were retrospectively recruited. The elderly adult patients (≥ 60 years at first VDZ dose) were matched clinically 1:2 to younger patients (18-59 years).

Results: This study included 30 elderly and 60 younger adult patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding sex, body mass index, percentage of smokers, disease duration, disease extent, disease activity, Mayo endoscopic scores, extra-intestinal manifestations, perianal disease, history of bowel-related surgery, or previous and concomitant therapies. At week 6, the clinical remission and steroid-free clinical remission (SFCR) rates were significantly lower (10.00% vs. 33.33%, P = 0.017; 3.33% vs. 26.67%, P = 0.005) in the elderly group than in the younger group, but there was no significant difference in the clinical response rates (P = 1.000). There was no significant difference in the clinical response, remission, and SFCR rates between the two groups at weeks 14, 22, 38, 46, and 54 (P > 0.05). The frequency of adverse events associated with VDZ was comparable between the two groups (33.33% vs. 38.33%, P = 0.643).

Conclusions: The efficacy and safety of VDZ in elderly and younger adult patients with UC are similar. Thus, VDZ can be considered both safe and efficacious for treating elderly adult patients with UC.

vedolizumab在中重度溃疡性结肠炎老年和年轻患者中的疗效和安全性:中国的一项回顾性现实世界研究
背景:关于vedolizumab (VDZ)在中国老年溃疡性结肠炎(UC)患者中的疗效和安全性的数据有限。在这项调查中,对老年和年轻成人UC队列进行了疗效和安全性的比较分析。方法:回顾性招募2021年3月至2024年11月期间在我诊所接受至少3次VDZ输注的中重度UC患者。老年患者(首次服用VDZ时年龄≥60岁)与年轻患者(18-59岁)临床比例为1:2。结果:本研究纳入老年患者30例,青年患者60例。两组患者在性别、体重指数、吸烟者百分比、疾病持续时间、疾病程度、疾病活动度、Mayo内镜评分、肠外表现、肛周疾病、肠道相关手术史或既往及伴随治疗方面无显著差异。在第6周,临床缓解率和无类固醇临床缓解率(SFCR)显著降低(10.00% vs. 33.33%, P = 0.017;老年组比青年组有效率(3.33%比26.67%,P = 0.005),但临床有效率差异无统计学意义(P = 1.000)。两组患者在第14、22、38、46、54周的临床反应、缓解和SFCR率均无显著差异(P < 0.05)。两组患者与VDZ相关的不良事件发生频率具有可比性(33.33% vs 38.33%, P = 0.643)。结论:VDZ治疗老年和青年UC患者的疗效和安全性相似。因此,VDZ治疗老年UC是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信