Triage of women with a positive HPV DNA test: evaluating a DNA methylation panel for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cervical cancer in cervical cytology samples.
Yifei Ren, Fengjiang Qin, Li Shen, LanFang Li, Qingrong Wu, Ping Yi
{"title":"Triage of women with a positive HPV DNA test: evaluating a DNA methylation panel for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cervical cancer in cervical cytology samples.","authors":"Yifei Ren, Fengjiang Qin, Li Shen, LanFang Li, Qingrong Wu, Ping Yi","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14531-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Efficient triage of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women is essential to avoid unnecessary referrals and overtreatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the commercially available DNA methylation panel, GynTect® (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17, and ZNF671), in cervical cytology samples from 146 women for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or cervical carcinoma (CC). This analysis focuses particularly on the performance of the ZNF671 methylation marker (ZNF671<sup>m</sup>) within the panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive rates of all triage markers-hrHPV, TCT, HPV16/18, GynTect®, and ZNF671<sup>m</sup>-correlated with increasing severity of CIN lesions (Chi-squared test for trend, P < 0.01). ZNF671<sup>m</sup> exhibited the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.734-0.888) for identifying CIN3 + cases, closely followed by GynTect® (AUC 0.800, 95% CI: 0.721-0.878). Among 102 hrHPV-positive women, employing GynTect® or ZNF671<sup>m</sup> instead of TCT yielded identical sensitivity (0.84; 95% CI: 0.69-1.01) but enhanced specificity (86% and 90%, respectively) for detecting CIN3 +. Adding HPV16/18 to the triage strategy maintained similar outcomes. Additionally, ZNF671<sup>m</sup> showed a significant risk difference (60.0%; 95% CI 42.8-77.1%) for detecting CIN3 +, on par with GynTect® (57.6%; 95% CI 37.9-71.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ZNF671<sup>m</sup> within the GynTect® panel demonstrates robust triage performance in diagnosing CIN3 + cases, with efficacy comparable to the full panel. These findings suggest that ZNF671<sup>m</sup> could be a promising alternative for cytologic triage, warranting further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14531-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Efficient triage of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women is essential to avoid unnecessary referrals and overtreatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the commercially available DNA methylation panel, GynTect® (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17, and ZNF671), in cervical cytology samples from 146 women for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or cervical carcinoma (CC). This analysis focuses particularly on the performance of the ZNF671 methylation marker (ZNF671m) within the panel.
Results: The positive rates of all triage markers-hrHPV, TCT, HPV16/18, GynTect®, and ZNF671m-correlated with increasing severity of CIN lesions (Chi-squared test for trend, P < 0.01). ZNF671m exhibited the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.734-0.888) for identifying CIN3 + cases, closely followed by GynTect® (AUC 0.800, 95% CI: 0.721-0.878). Among 102 hrHPV-positive women, employing GynTect® or ZNF671m instead of TCT yielded identical sensitivity (0.84; 95% CI: 0.69-1.01) but enhanced specificity (86% and 90%, respectively) for detecting CIN3 +. Adding HPV16/18 to the triage strategy maintained similar outcomes. Additionally, ZNF671m showed a significant risk difference (60.0%; 95% CI 42.8-77.1%) for detecting CIN3 +, on par with GynTect® (57.6%; 95% CI 37.9-71.2%).
Conclusion: ZNF671m within the GynTect® panel demonstrates robust triage performance in diagnosing CIN3 + cases, with efficacy comparable to the full panel. These findings suggest that ZNF671m could be a promising alternative for cytologic triage, warranting further validation.
期刊介绍:
BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.