Triage of women with a positive HPV DNA test: evaluating a DNA methylation panel for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cervical cancer in cervical cytology samples.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Yifei Ren, Fengjiang Qin, Li Shen, LanFang Li, Qingrong Wu, Ping Yi
{"title":"Triage of women with a positive HPV DNA test: evaluating a DNA methylation panel for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cervical cancer in cervical cytology samples.","authors":"Yifei Ren, Fengjiang Qin, Li Shen, LanFang Li, Qingrong Wu, Ping Yi","doi":"10.1186/s12885-025-14531-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Efficient triage of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women is essential to avoid unnecessary referrals and overtreatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the commercially available DNA methylation panel, GynTect® (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17, and ZNF671), in cervical cytology samples from 146 women for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or cervical carcinoma (CC). This analysis focuses particularly on the performance of the ZNF671 methylation marker (ZNF671<sup>m</sup>) within the panel.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive rates of all triage markers-hrHPV, TCT, HPV16/18, GynTect®, and ZNF671<sup>m</sup>-correlated with increasing severity of CIN lesions (Chi-squared test for trend, P < 0.01). ZNF671<sup>m</sup> exhibited the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.734-0.888) for identifying CIN3 + cases, closely followed by GynTect® (AUC 0.800, 95% CI: 0.721-0.878). Among 102 hrHPV-positive women, employing GynTect® or ZNF671<sup>m</sup> instead of TCT yielded identical sensitivity (0.84; 95% CI: 0.69-1.01) but enhanced specificity (86% and 90%, respectively) for detecting CIN3 +. Adding HPV16/18 to the triage strategy maintained similar outcomes. Additionally, ZNF671<sup>m</sup> showed a significant risk difference (60.0%; 95% CI 42.8-77.1%) for detecting CIN3 +, on par with GynTect® (57.6%; 95% CI 37.9-71.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ZNF671<sup>m</sup> within the GynTect® panel demonstrates robust triage performance in diagnosing CIN3 + cases, with efficacy comparable to the full panel. These findings suggest that ZNF671<sup>m</sup> could be a promising alternative for cytologic triage, warranting further validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"25 1","pages":"1207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-14531-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Efficient triage of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV)-positive women is essential to avoid unnecessary referrals and overtreatment. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of the commercially available DNA methylation panel, GynTect® (ASTN1, DLX1, ITGA4, RXFP3, SOX17, and ZNF671), in cervical cytology samples from 146 women for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) or cervical carcinoma (CC). This analysis focuses particularly on the performance of the ZNF671 methylation marker (ZNF671m) within the panel.

Results: The positive rates of all triage markers-hrHPV, TCT, HPV16/18, GynTect®, and ZNF671m-correlated with increasing severity of CIN lesions (Chi-squared test for trend, P < 0.01). ZNF671m exhibited the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.811 (95% CI: 0.734-0.888) for identifying CIN3 + cases, closely followed by GynTect® (AUC 0.800, 95% CI: 0.721-0.878). Among 102 hrHPV-positive women, employing GynTect® or ZNF671m instead of TCT yielded identical sensitivity (0.84; 95% CI: 0.69-1.01) but enhanced specificity (86% and 90%, respectively) for detecting CIN3 +. Adding HPV16/18 to the triage strategy maintained similar outcomes. Additionally, ZNF671m showed a significant risk difference (60.0%; 95% CI 42.8-77.1%) for detecting CIN3 +, on par with GynTect® (57.6%; 95% CI 37.9-71.2%).

Conclusion: ZNF671m within the GynTect® panel demonstrates robust triage performance in diagnosing CIN3 + cases, with efficacy comparable to the full panel. These findings suggest that ZNF671m could be a promising alternative for cytologic triage, warranting further validation.

HPV DNA检测阳性妇女的分诊:评估DNA甲基化小组检测宫颈上皮内瘤变3级和宫颈细胞学样本中的宫颈癌。
背景:对高危人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)阳性妇女进行有效的分诊对避免不必要的转诊和过度治疗至关重要。本研究评估了市购DNA甲基化检测试剂盒gynect®(ASTN1、DLX1、ITGA4、RXFP3、SOX17和ZNF671)在146名女性宫颈细胞学样本中检测宫颈上皮内瘤变3级(CIN3)或宫颈癌(CC)的诊断准确性。该分析特别侧重于面板中ZNF671甲基化标记(ZNF671m)的性能。结果:hrhpv、TCT、HPV16/18、GynTect®和znf671m的所有分类标记的阳性率与CIN病变严重程度的增加相关(趋势卡方检验,P m识别CIN3 +病例的曲线下面积(AUC)最高,为0.811 (95% CI: 0.734-0.888),紧随其后的是GynTect®(AUC 0.800, 95% CI: 0.721-0.878)。在102名hrhpv阳性妇女中,使用gyyntect®或ZNF671m代替TCT获得相同的灵敏度(0.84;95% CI: 0.69-1.01),但检测CIN3 +的特异性增强(分别为86%和90%)。将HPV16/18添加到分诊策略中保持类似的结果。此外,ZNF671m存在显著的风险差异(60.0%;95% CI 42.8-77.1%)检测CIN3 +,与gyynect®(57.6%;95% ci 37.9-71.2%)。结论:GynTect®面板中的ZNF671m在诊断CIN3 +病例方面表现出强大的分诊性能,其疗效与完整面板相当。这些发现表明ZNF671m可能是细胞学分类的一个有希望的替代方案,需要进一步验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信