Early thrombus removal through peroneal venous approach for treating acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Hao Tian, Fenghe Li, Yu Zhao, Biyun Teng, Qiu Zeng
{"title":"Early thrombus removal through peroneal venous approach for treating acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.","authors":"Hao Tian, Fenghe Li, Yu Zhao, Biyun Teng, Qiu Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2025.06.044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of thrombus removal using the peroneal vein (PeV) approach in acute IFDVT.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>From May 2019 to July 2020, the acute IFDVT patients who had undergone AngioJet pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PCDT) and/or manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) through PeV access were analyzed retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, operative and postoperative therapy details, and PeV access-related data were investigated. Outcome measures included thrombus removal grade, venous patency rate, and the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). All patients were followed up for a minimum of one year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 patients were reviewed. The thrombus involved the popliteal vein in 85.7% (n = 36) of cases. The PeV access was successfully achieved in all patients through four puncture methods. Therein, blind puncture under fluoroscopy was used in 52.4% of patients. Postoperatively, the mean thrombolysis time was 4.8 ± 1.9 days, and the average dose of urokinase was 2.7 ± 1.0 MIU. All the patients had successfully thrombus lysis, including 9.5% of grade II lysis and 90.5% of grade III lysis. Three complications occurred during the thrombolysis treatment, including two puncture site minor bleeding and one minor gingival bleeding. During the one-year follow-up, the venous patency rate and the PTS incidence rate were 97.6% and 9.5%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Thrombus removal of acute IFDVT through PeV access is safe, effective, and feasible, while large cohort studies are needed to confirm the superiority of PeV access.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2025.06.044","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and feasibility of thrombus removal using the peroneal vein (PeV) approach in acute IFDVT.

Material and methods: From May 2019 to July 2020, the acute IFDVT patients who had undergone AngioJet pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PCDT) and/or manual aspiration thrombectomy (MAT) through PeV access were analyzed retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, operative and postoperative therapy details, and PeV access-related data were investigated. Outcome measures included thrombus removal grade, venous patency rate, and the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). All patients were followed up for a minimum of one year.

Results: A total of 42 patients were reviewed. The thrombus involved the popliteal vein in 85.7% (n = 36) of cases. The PeV access was successfully achieved in all patients through four puncture methods. Therein, blind puncture under fluoroscopy was used in 52.4% of patients. Postoperatively, the mean thrombolysis time was 4.8 ± 1.9 days, and the average dose of urokinase was 2.7 ± 1.0 MIU. All the patients had successfully thrombus lysis, including 9.5% of grade II lysis and 90.5% of grade III lysis. Three complications occurred during the thrombolysis treatment, including two puncture site minor bleeding and one minor gingival bleeding. During the one-year follow-up, the venous patency rate and the PTS incidence rate were 97.6% and 9.5%, respectively.

Conclusions: Thrombus removal of acute IFDVT through PeV access is safe, effective, and feasible, while large cohort studies are needed to confirm the superiority of PeV access.

腓股静脉入路早期取栓治疗急性髂股深静脉血栓。
目的:本研究的目的是评估经腓骨静脉(PeV)入路在急性IFDVT中取栓的安全性、有效性和可行性。材料与方法:回顾性分析2019年5月至2020年7月急性IFDVT患者经PeV通道行AngioJet药物力学取栓术(PCDT)和/或手动吸入性取栓术(MAT)的病例。研究临床特点、手术及术后治疗细节及PeV通路相关资料。结果指标包括血栓清除等级、静脉通畅率和血栓形成后综合征(PTS)的发生率。所有患者随访至少1年。结果:共回顾42例患者。血栓累及腘静脉占85.7%(36例)。所有患者均通过四种穿刺方法成功进入PeV。其中,52.4%的患者采用透视下盲穿刺。术后平均溶栓时间4.8±1.9天,尿激酶平均剂量2.7±1.0 MIU。所有患者均成功溶栓,其中II级溶栓9.5%,III级溶栓90.5%。溶栓治疗过程中出现3例并发症,其中穿刺部位轻度出血2例,牙龈轻度出血1例。随访1年,静脉通畅率为97.6%,PTS发生率为9.5%。结论:经PeV通路清除急性IFDVT血栓是安全、有效、可行的,但PeV通路的优越性还需要大量的队列研究来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信