Role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer: A Danish single institution cohort.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Sara Linde, Marianne Maquard Knap, Lone Hoffmann, Azza Ahmed Kahlil, Christina Maria Lutz, Maria Kandi, Lise Saksø Mortensen, Ditte Sloth Møller, Hjørdis Hjalting Schmidt
{"title":"Role of prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer: A Danish single institution cohort.","authors":"Sara Linde, Marianne Maquard Knap, Lone Hoffmann, Azza Ahmed Kahlil, Christina Maria Lutz, Maria Kandi, Lise Saksø Mortensen, Ditte Sloth Møller, Hjørdis Hjalting Schmidt","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is part of standard treatment for patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC), treated with curative intent. However, doubt has been raised about the efficacy of PCI in a modern clinical setting. Therefore, we examined factors impacting PCI receival, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic brain metastases, and overall survival (OS) with and without PCI. Patient/material and methods: Records of 190 patients with LD-SCLC consecutively treated between 2012 and 2021 at our institution were reviewed. Patients were grouped based on whether they received PCI (PCI, n = 119) or not (no PCI, n = 71). Baseline characteristics, Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS, and cumulative incidence of symptomatic brain metastases were compared for the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PCI no patients were older, had a poorer performance status, were more often treated in 2018-2021 and had more frequently a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the time of diagnosis. No PCI median OS was 19 months compared to 24 months for PCI, not significantly different (p = 0.40). During follow-up 54 patients (28.4%) developed symptomatic brain metastases, with no statistically significant difference in the numbers of patients with, and cumulative incidence of, symptomatic brain metastases between the two groups (p = 0.35 and p = 0.21, respectively).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Despite patients not receiving PCI being older and in poorer performance status, no statistically significant difference in OS or cumulative incidence of brain metastasis were observed compared to patients who received PCI. This supports uncertainty regarding the role of PCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"966-971"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12308536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) is part of standard treatment for patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC), treated with curative intent. However, doubt has been raised about the efficacy of PCI in a modern clinical setting. Therefore, we examined factors impacting PCI receival, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic brain metastases, and overall survival (OS) with and without PCI. Patient/material and methods: Records of 190 patients with LD-SCLC consecutively treated between 2012 and 2021 at our institution were reviewed. Patients were grouped based on whether they received PCI (PCI, n = 119) or not (no PCI, n = 71). Baseline characteristics, Kaplan-Meier estimates of OS, and cumulative incidence of symptomatic brain metastases were compared for the two groups.

Results: PCI no patients were older, had a poorer performance status, were more often treated in 2018-2021 and had more frequently a brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the time of diagnosis. No PCI median OS was 19 months compared to 24 months for PCI, not significantly different (p = 0.40). During follow-up 54 patients (28.4%) developed symptomatic brain metastases, with no statistically significant difference in the numbers of patients with, and cumulative incidence of, symptomatic brain metastases between the two groups (p = 0.35 and p = 0.21, respectively).

Interpretation: Despite patients not receiving PCI being older and in poorer performance status, no statistically significant difference in OS or cumulative incidence of brain metastasis were observed compared to patients who received PCI. This supports uncertainty regarding the role of PCI.

Abstract Image

预防性颅照射在有限病变小细胞肺癌患者中的作用:丹麦单一机构队列研究
背景和目的:预防性头颅照射(PCI)是有限病变小细胞肺癌(LD-SCLC)患者标准治疗的一部分,治疗目的是治愈。然而,对PCI在现代临床环境中的有效性提出了质疑。因此,我们研究了影响PCI治疗的因素,症状性脑转移的累积发生率,以及有和没有PCI的总生存期(OS)。患者/材料和方法:回顾我院2012年至2021年间连续治疗的190例LD-SCLC患者的记录。根据是否接受PCI (PCI, n = 119)和是否接受PCI (n = 71)进行分组。比较两组患者的基线特征、Kaplan-Meier估计OS和症状性脑转移的累积发生率。结果:PCI患者年龄较大,表现较差,在2018-2021年更频繁地接受治疗,并且在诊断时更频繁地进行脑磁共振成像(MRI)检查。无PCI组中位OS为19个月,PCI组中位OS为24个月,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.40)。随访期间,54例(28.4%)患者出现症状性脑转移,两组患者出现症状性脑转移的人数及累积发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.35, p = 0.21)。解释:尽管未接受PCI治疗的患者年龄较大且表现较差,但与接受PCI治疗的患者相比,观察到OS或脑转移累积发生率无统计学意义差异。这支持了PCI角色的不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信