Understanding oncological and sexual function outcomes with gynaecological organ preserving cystectomy in women with bladder cancer; a systematic review

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70053
Rebecca Martin, Harriet Wylie, Charlotte Moss, Shaista Hafeez, Pardeep Kumar, Anne Marie Rafferty, Mieke Van Hemelrijck
{"title":"Understanding oncological and sexual function outcomes with gynaecological organ preserving cystectomy in women with bladder cancer; a systematic review","authors":"Rebecca Martin,&nbsp;Harriet Wylie,&nbsp;Charlotte Moss,&nbsp;Shaista Hafeez,&nbsp;Pardeep Kumar,&nbsp;Anne Marie Rafferty,&nbsp;Mieke Van Hemelrijck","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Cystectomy for bladder cancer (BC) in women involves removing gynaecological organs and the anterior vaginal wall, significantly impacting sexual function (SF). Gynaecological organ-preserving cystectomy (GOPC) aims to minimise toxicity, but limited studies assess its impact. We reviewed existing evidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic review was conducted using Ovid (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL) and Cochrane Library. Studies assessing survival and SF outcomes of GOPC and SF outcomes of standard cystectomy were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Fourteen studies (1049 screened) reported on small cohorts (11–41 patients). Most GOPC patients had ≤T2b N0 M0 disease, while standard cystectomy patients had up to T4/N1. In the GOPC cohort median follow-up was 36 months.</p>\n \n <p>Over a 16–70 month period, Disease-Free Survival in GOPC patients was 80–100%. Due to heterogeneity in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS), a narrative analysis was performed.</p>\n \n <p>GOPC patients reported high levels of sexual activity, reduced dyspareunia and moderate-to-high satisfaction. While SF initially declined, recovery improved over time, with Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores exceeding the 26.2 dysfunction threshold in two studies by 12 months.</p>\n \n <p>In standard cystectomy, sexual dysfunction was common, with varying distress levels and inadequate patient counselling.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Understanding the outcomes of GOPC is limited by study design and measurement variability, and meta-analysis was not possible. In this narrative review, oncological outcomes in the GOPC group appears to have equivalent oncological outcomes to a standard radical cystectomy in carefully selected female patients. Sexual recovery outcomes in either complete or partial sexual organ preserving cystectomy appear to be better than a standard female radical cystectomy. Further prospective studies, particularly those involving nerve-sparing surgery, are needed. Women undergoing either standard cystectomy and GOPC commonly experience sexual dysfunction, and there is a need to improve pre- and post-operative counselling.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.70053","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Objectives

Cystectomy for bladder cancer (BC) in women involves removing gynaecological organs and the anterior vaginal wall, significantly impacting sexual function (SF). Gynaecological organ-preserving cystectomy (GOPC) aims to minimise toxicity, but limited studies assess its impact. We reviewed existing evidence.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using Ovid (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL) and Cochrane Library. Studies assessing survival and SF outcomes of GOPC and SF outcomes of standard cystectomy were included.

Results

Fourteen studies (1049 screened) reported on small cohorts (11–41 patients). Most GOPC patients had ≤T2b N0 M0 disease, while standard cystectomy patients had up to T4/N1. In the GOPC cohort median follow-up was 36 months.

Over a 16–70 month period, Disease-Free Survival in GOPC patients was 80–100%. Due to heterogeneity in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS), a narrative analysis was performed.

GOPC patients reported high levels of sexual activity, reduced dyspareunia and moderate-to-high satisfaction. While SF initially declined, recovery improved over time, with Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) scores exceeding the 26.2 dysfunction threshold in two studies by 12 months.

In standard cystectomy, sexual dysfunction was common, with varying distress levels and inadequate patient counselling.

Conclusions

Understanding the outcomes of GOPC is limited by study design and measurement variability, and meta-analysis was not possible. In this narrative review, oncological outcomes in the GOPC group appears to have equivalent oncological outcomes to a standard radical cystectomy in carefully selected female patients. Sexual recovery outcomes in either complete or partial sexual organ preserving cystectomy appear to be better than a standard female radical cystectomy. Further prospective studies, particularly those involving nerve-sparing surgery, are needed. Women undergoing either standard cystectomy and GOPC commonly experience sexual dysfunction, and there is a need to improve pre- and post-operative counselling.

Abstract Image

了解保留妇科器官膀胱切除术对膀胱癌患者肿瘤和性功能的影响系统回顾
女性膀胱癌(BC)的膀胱切除术包括切除妇科器官和阴道前壁,显著影响性功能(SF)。妇科器官保留膀胱切除术(GOPC)的目的是尽量减少毒性,但有限的研究评估其影响。我们回顾了现有的证据。方法采用Ovid (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL)和Cochrane Library进行系统评价。包括评估GOPC的生存和SF结果以及标准膀胱切除术的SF结果的研究。14项研究(1049项筛选)报告了小队列(11-41例患者)。大多数GOPC患者≤T2b N0 M0病变,而标准膀胱切除术患者最高为T4/N1。在GOPC队列中,中位随访时间为36个月。在16-70个月期间,GOPC患者的无病生存率为80-100%。由于患者报告结果测量(PROMS)的异质性,我们进行了叙述分析。GOPC患者报告高水平的性活动,减少性交困难和中高满意度。虽然性功能障碍最初有所下降,但随着时间的推移,恢复情况有所改善,在两项研究中,女性性功能指数(FSFI)得分在12个月内超过了26.2的功能障碍阈值。在标准膀胱切除术中,性功能障碍是常见的,有不同的痛苦程度和不充分的患者咨询。结论:GOPC的结局受限于研究设计和测量的可变性,无法进行meta分析。在这篇叙述性综述中,在精心挑选的女性患者中,GOPC组的肿瘤预后似乎与标准根治性膀胱切除术的肿瘤预后相当。完全或部分保留性器官的膀胱切除术的性恢复结果似乎优于标准的女性根治性膀胱切除术。需要进一步的前瞻性研究,特别是涉及神经保留手术的研究。接受标准膀胱切除术和GOPC的女性通常会出现性功能障碍,需要改善术前和术后咨询。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信