Lars C. Pietersen, Niels Broekman, Marije Reekers, Hein Putter, Maarten E. Tushuizen, Ian P. J. Alwayn, Bart van Hoek, Andries E. Braat
{"title":"Addition of a Temporary Portocaval Shunt Does Not Reduce Acute Kidney Injury in Caval-Sparing Liver Transplantation","authors":"Lars C. Pietersen, Niels Broekman, Marije Reekers, Hein Putter, Maarten E. Tushuizen, Ian P. J. Alwayn, Bart van Hoek, Andries E. Braat","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication following liver transplantation (LT), with multifactorial etiology. It is believed that perioperative hemodynamic instability could lead to AKI. A temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) could possibly prevent this, but its beneficial effect is still controversial, especially in caval-sparing LT. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a TPCS during hepatectomy reduces the incidence and severity of post-LT AKI in caval-sparing LT, defined according to AKIN criteria. Between January 2005 and August 2023, all orthotopic LTs performed in a single center were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into a TPCS group (<i>n</i> = 134) and a no-TPCS group (<i>n</i> = 260). Serum creatinine was collected right before LT and daily during the first week post-LT. In multivariate analysis, TPCS was not related to AKI, while diabetes mellitus (<i>p</i> = 0.01) and LabMELD (<i>p</i> = 0.02) were. When comparing TPCS and no-TPCS groups, no differences were seen in median increase of serum creatinine post-LT (TPCS; 12 µmol/L (-4–52) versus no-TPCS; 14 µmol/L ± (-3–52) (<i>p</i> = 0.94)), number of post-LT AKI (TPCS; 31% versus no-TPCS; 33% (<i>p</i> = 0.57)), or severity of post-LT AKI (<i>p</i> = 0.90). In conclusion, the application of a TPCS during hepatectomy is not associated with less post-LT AKI or less severe post-LT AKI when using a caval-sparing LT technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"39 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70259","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication following liver transplantation (LT), with multifactorial etiology. It is believed that perioperative hemodynamic instability could lead to AKI. A temporary portocaval shunt (TPCS) could possibly prevent this, but its beneficial effect is still controversial, especially in caval-sparing LT. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate whether the use of a TPCS during hepatectomy reduces the incidence and severity of post-LT AKI in caval-sparing LT, defined according to AKIN criteria. Between January 2005 and August 2023, all orthotopic LTs performed in a single center were retrospectively analyzed and were divided into a TPCS group (n = 134) and a no-TPCS group (n = 260). Serum creatinine was collected right before LT and daily during the first week post-LT. In multivariate analysis, TPCS was not related to AKI, while diabetes mellitus (p = 0.01) and LabMELD (p = 0.02) were. When comparing TPCS and no-TPCS groups, no differences were seen in median increase of serum creatinine post-LT (TPCS; 12 µmol/L (-4–52) versus no-TPCS; 14 µmol/L ± (-3–52) (p = 0.94)), number of post-LT AKI (TPCS; 31% versus no-TPCS; 33% (p = 0.57)), or severity of post-LT AKI (p = 0.90). In conclusion, the application of a TPCS during hepatectomy is not associated with less post-LT AKI or less severe post-LT AKI when using a caval-sparing LT technique.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.