Living Will: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Perspective, Knowledge, and Clinical Use of General Practitioners in Portugal

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mariana Batista Maciel, Luísa Castro, Rui Nunes
{"title":"Living Will: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Perspective, Knowledge, and Clinical Use of General Practitioners in Portugal","authors":"Mariana Batista Maciel,&nbsp;Luísa Castro,&nbsp;Rui Nunes","doi":"10.1111/jep.70213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Rationale</h3>\n \n <p>In Portugal, living wills—legal documents allowing individuals to express healthcare preferences in case of future incapacity—have been recognized since 2012. Despite this, public engagement remains limited, and previous studies have highlighted both public unawareness and knowledge gaps among healthcare professionals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims and Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to assess the perspectives, knowledge, and clinical use of living will among Portuguese General Practitioners (GPs), given their pivotal role in promoting health literacy and patient autonomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A cross-sectional, quantitative survey was conducted among Portuguese GPs, using a 30-item online questionnaire that covered demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices. Non-parametric statistical analyses, including Spearman correlation and the Mann-Whitney test, were used to assess associations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 392 GPs answered the questionnaire, with a median age of 35 years. In their clinical practice, almost half of healthcare professionals have had conversations with their patients about Advance Directives (ADs), although 22.3% were unable to locate a living will in the Portuguese Public Healthcare Service Electronic System. The median number of correct answers to the 14 questions that require knowledge about the Portuguese law of ADs was 10, with a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 14. Most doctors reported that fewer than 1% of their patients have inquired about ADs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Despite recognizing the importance of living wills, GPs seldom address them in consultations, often due to limited knowledge and practical barriers. Findings underscore the need for targeted training and public awareness initiatives to promote advanced care planning in primary care settings.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

In Portugal, living wills—legal documents allowing individuals to express healthcare preferences in case of future incapacity—have been recognized since 2012. Despite this, public engagement remains limited, and previous studies have highlighted both public unawareness and knowledge gaps among healthcare professionals.

Aims and Objectives

This study aimed to assess the perspectives, knowledge, and clinical use of living will among Portuguese General Practitioners (GPs), given their pivotal role in promoting health literacy and patient autonomy.

Methods

A cross-sectional, quantitative survey was conducted among Portuguese GPs, using a 30-item online questionnaire that covered demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practices. Non-parametric statistical analyses, including Spearman correlation and the Mann-Whitney test, were used to assess associations.

Results

A total of 392 GPs answered the questionnaire, with a median age of 35 years. In their clinical practice, almost half of healthcare professionals have had conversations with their patients about Advance Directives (ADs), although 22.3% were unable to locate a living will in the Portuguese Public Healthcare Service Electronic System. The median number of correct answers to the 14 questions that require knowledge about the Portuguese law of ADs was 10, with a minimum of 5 and a maximum of 14. Most doctors reported that fewer than 1% of their patients have inquired about ADs.

Conclusions

Despite recognizing the importance of living wills, GPs seldom address them in consultations, often due to limited knowledge and practical barriers. Findings underscore the need for targeted training and public awareness initiatives to promote advanced care planning in primary care settings.

生前遗嘱:对葡萄牙全科医生的观点、知识和临床应用的横断面研究
在葡萄牙,生前遗嘱——允许个人在未来丧失行为能力的情况下表达医疗偏好的法律文件——自2012年以来得到承认。尽管如此,公众参与仍然有限,以前的研究强调了公众的不知情和医疗保健专业人员之间的知识差距。本研究旨在评估葡萄牙全科医生(gp)对生活意愿的观点、知识和临床应用,因为他们在促进健康素养和患者自主方面发挥着关键作用。方法对葡萄牙全科医生进行横断面定量调查,使用30项在线问卷,涵盖人口统计、知识、态度和临床实践。非参数统计分析,包括Spearman相关和Mann-Whitney检验,用于评估相关性。结果共有392名全科医生参与问卷调查,平均年龄35岁。在他们的临床实践中,几乎一半的医疗保健专业人员与他们的病人就预先指示(ADs)进行过对话,尽管22.3%的人无法在葡萄牙公共医疗服务电子系统中找到生前遗嘱。在要求了解葡萄牙ad法的14道题中,正确答案的中位数为10,最低为5,最高为14。大多数医生报告说,只有不到1%的患者询问过ad。结论尽管认识到生前遗嘱的重要性,但由于知识有限和实践障碍,全科医生很少在咨询中提到这一点。调查结果强调需要有针对性的培训和提高公众意识的举措,以促进初级保健机构的高级护理规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信