Comparative Risk of Major Bleeding With Concomitant Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Corticosteroid Bursts

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Tsung-Chieh Yao, Sheng-Mao Chang, Yi-Fen Tsai, Shuo-Ju Chiang, Hui-Ju Tsai
{"title":"Comparative Risk of Major Bleeding With Concomitant Use of Oral Anticoagulants and Corticosteroid Bursts","authors":"Tsung-Chieh Yao,&nbsp;Sheng-Mao Chang,&nbsp;Yi-Fen Tsai,&nbsp;Shuo-Ju Chiang,&nbsp;Hui-Ju Tsai","doi":"10.1111/cts.70311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The choice of oral anticoagulants and oral corticosteroid (OCS) burst cotherapy may influence the risk of major bleeding; however, this risk remains poorly characterized. We aimed to quantify the comparative safety of non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin on major bleeding while receiving OCS burst cotherapy among patients with atrial fibrillation. A nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database. We examined associations between NOACs (edoxaban, apixaban, dabigartran, or rivaroxaban) or warfarin with OCS burst cotherapy and major bleeding. We measured the risk by estimating incidence, incidence risk ratios (IRRs), and adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) after adjusting for baseline differences using overlap weighting. In this study, among 239,693 patients receiving oral anticoagulants, 50,390 (21%) received at least one OCS burst, defined as OCS use for less than 30 days, were included. A lower risk of major bleeding related to OCS burst cotherapy with NOACs versus warfarin was noted (AHR = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.52–0.61]). The greatest incidence was observed in patients with warfarin and OCS burst cotherapy (67.30 per 1000 person-years). The incidence for patients prescribing OCS burst cotherapy with edoxaban (30.36 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.45 [95% CI = 0.38–0.53]), apixaban (34.93 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.52 [95% CI = 0.45–0.60]), dabigatran (42.47 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.63 [95% CI = 0.56–0.72]), and rivaroxaban (46.99 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.70 [95% CI = 0.63–0.77]), separately, was lower than that with warfarin. The results reveal that the incidence of major bleeding was lowest for edoxaban and highest for warfarin, with notable differences in incidence rates across NOACs among patients receiving oral anticoagulants and OCS burst cotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70311","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://ascpt.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70311","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The choice of oral anticoagulants and oral corticosteroid (OCS) burst cotherapy may influence the risk of major bleeding; however, this risk remains poorly characterized. We aimed to quantify the comparative safety of non–vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) versus warfarin on major bleeding while receiving OCS burst cotherapy among patients with atrial fibrillation. A nationwide population-based cohort study was conducted using the National Health Insurance Research Database. We examined associations between NOACs (edoxaban, apixaban, dabigartran, or rivaroxaban) or warfarin with OCS burst cotherapy and major bleeding. We measured the risk by estimating incidence, incidence risk ratios (IRRs), and adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) after adjusting for baseline differences using overlap weighting. In this study, among 239,693 patients receiving oral anticoagulants, 50,390 (21%) received at least one OCS burst, defined as OCS use for less than 30 days, were included. A lower risk of major bleeding related to OCS burst cotherapy with NOACs versus warfarin was noted (AHR = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.52–0.61]). The greatest incidence was observed in patients with warfarin and OCS burst cotherapy (67.30 per 1000 person-years). The incidence for patients prescribing OCS burst cotherapy with edoxaban (30.36 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.45 [95% CI = 0.38–0.53]), apixaban (34.93 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.52 [95% CI = 0.45–0.60]), dabigatran (42.47 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.63 [95% CI = 0.56–0.72]), and rivaroxaban (46.99 per 1000 person-years; IRR = 0.70 [95% CI = 0.63–0.77]), separately, was lower than that with warfarin. The results reveal that the incidence of major bleeding was lowest for edoxaban and highest for warfarin, with notable differences in incidence rates across NOACs among patients receiving oral anticoagulants and OCS burst cotherapy.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

口服抗凝剂和皮质类固醇同时使用大出血的危险性比较
口服抗凝剂和口服皮质类固醇(OCS)爆发联合治疗的选择可能影响大出血的风险;然而,这种风险的特征仍然很差。我们的目的是量化非维生素K口服抗凝剂(NOACs)与华法林在房颤患者接受OCS突发协同治疗时大出血的比较安全性。使用国家健康保险研究数据库进行了一项全国性的基于人群的队列研究。我们研究了NOACs(依多沙班、阿哌沙班、达比加群或利伐沙班)或华法林与OCS突发联合治疗和大出血之间的关系。我们通过估算发病率、发病率风险比(IRRs)和在使用重叠加权调整基线差异后调整的风险比(AHRs)来测量风险。在本研究中,在接受口服抗凝剂治疗的239,693例患者中,50,390例(21%)患者接受了至少一次OCS发作,定义为OCS使用时间少于30天。与华法林相比,NOACs与OCS突发联合治疗的大出血风险较低(AHR = 0.57 [95% CI = 0.52-0.61])。华法林和OCS联合治疗的患者发病率最高(67.30 / 1000人年)。与依多沙班联合使用OCS突发治疗的患者发病率(30.36 / 1000人年;IRR = 0.45 [95% CI = 0.38-0.53]),阿哌沙班(34.93 / 1000人年;IRR = 0.52 [95% CI = 0.45-0.60]),达比加群(42.47 / 1000人年;IRR = 0.63 [95% CI = 0.56-0.72])和利伐沙班(46.99 / 1000人年;IRR = 0.70 [95% CI = 0.63-0.77]),均低于华法林组。结果显示,依多沙班组大出血发生率最低,华法林组最高,口服抗凝剂和OCS突发联合治疗的NOACs患者大出血发生率差异显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信