Classification performances of two diode arrays for patient-specific quality assurance of stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments based on absolute dose measurements in phantom

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Stefania Linsalata, Jake H. Pensavalle, Franco Perrone, Patrizio Barca, Fabio Di Martino, Fabiola Paiar, Antonio C. Traino
{"title":"Classification performances of two diode arrays for patient-specific quality assurance of stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments based on absolute dose measurements in phantom","authors":"Stefania Linsalata,&nbsp;Jake H. Pensavalle,&nbsp;Franco Perrone,&nbsp;Patrizio Barca,&nbsp;Fabio Di Martino,&nbsp;Fabiola Paiar,&nbsp;Antonio C. Traino","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the rapid growth in the clinical practice, no specific recommendations on pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic body radiation therapy plans have been established.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>In this contest, the study aims to identify optimal gamma analysis criteria and thresholds for the Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK and SRS MapCHECK arrays.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty SBRT plans were delivered on both devices per plan and field-by-field. The measurements were compared with calculations and Gamma Passing Rates (GPRs), obtained using global normalization in absolute dose and 10% threshold, with six different Dose Difference (DD) / Distance To Agreement (DTA) criteria stricter than those universally suggested by the Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 218, were recorded. Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis was performed on GPRs while varying the threshold from 0% to 100%, the agreement between calculations and absolute dose measurements, obtained with a IBA Razor chamber at the isocenter in phantom at different levels (i.e., 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%), being the Ground Truth. Significance of the resulting Areas Under Curve (AUCs) against the random guess was tested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>AUCs obtained with ArcCHECK are generally more significant than with SRS MapCHECK, while those measured field-by-field are more significant than per plan. Within the considered DD/DTA criteria, the most discriminative ones are device-specific, that is, 2%/2 mm or 1%/2 mm for ArcCHECK and 2%/1 mm or 1%/1 mm for SRS MapCHECK.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results on ArcCHECK confirm the indication of the AAPM Task Group No. 218, while for SRS MapCHECK, acceptable discriminating capabilities are possible with DTA = 1 mm, suggesting that devices with native higher spatial resolution, preferred in SBRT for the better sampling of the dose distribution, require tighter DTA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite the rapid growth in the clinical practice, no specific recommendations on pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic body radiation therapy plans have been established.

Purpose

In this contest, the study aims to identify optimal gamma analysis criteria and thresholds for the Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK and SRS MapCHECK arrays.

Methods

Twenty SBRT plans were delivered on both devices per plan and field-by-field. The measurements were compared with calculations and Gamma Passing Rates (GPRs), obtained using global normalization in absolute dose and 10% threshold, with six different Dose Difference (DD) / Distance To Agreement (DTA) criteria stricter than those universally suggested by the Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 218, were recorded. Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis was performed on GPRs while varying the threshold from 0% to 100%, the agreement between calculations and absolute dose measurements, obtained with a IBA Razor chamber at the isocenter in phantom at different levels (i.e., 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%), being the Ground Truth. Significance of the resulting Areas Under Curve (AUCs) against the random guess was tested.

Results

AUCs obtained with ArcCHECK are generally more significant than with SRS MapCHECK, while those measured field-by-field are more significant than per plan. Within the considered DD/DTA criteria, the most discriminative ones are device-specific, that is, 2%/2 mm or 1%/2 mm for ArcCHECK and 2%/1 mm or 1%/1 mm for SRS MapCHECK.

Conclusions

Our results on ArcCHECK confirm the indication of the AAPM Task Group No. 218, while for SRS MapCHECK, acceptable discriminating capabilities are possible with DTA = 1 mm, suggesting that devices with native higher spatial resolution, preferred in SBRT for the better sampling of the dose distribution, require tighter DTA.

Abstract Image

基于幻影绝对剂量测量的两种二极管阵列在立体定向全身放射治疗患者特异性质量保证中的分类性能
背景尽管临床实践快速增长,但尚未建立关于基于体积调制电弧治疗的立体定向体放射治疗计划的治疗前患者特异性质量保证的具体建议。在本次竞赛中,研究旨在确定太阳核ArcCHECK和SRS MapCHECK阵列的最佳伽马分析标准和阈值。方法在两种设备上按计划和逐场递送20个SBRT计划。测量结果与计算结果进行了比较,并记录了采用绝对剂量和10%阈值的全球归一化获得的伽马通过率(GPRs),并采用了比AAPM工作组第218号报告普遍建议的更严格的6种不同的剂量差(DD) /一致距离(DTA)标准。当阈值从0%到100%变化时,对GPRs进行接收器工作特性分析,计算和绝对剂量测量之间的一致性,在不同水平(即1%,2%,3%,4%和5%)的幻影等中心使用IBA剃刀室获得,是基础真相。结果曲线下面积(auc)对随机猜测的显著性进行了检验。结果ArcCHECK获得的auc通常比SRS MapCHECK更显著,而逐场测量的auc比逐计划测量的auc更显著。在考虑的DD/DTA标准中,最具区别性的标准是特定于设备的,即ArcCHECK为2%/ 2mm或1%/ 2mm, SRS MapCHECK为2%/ 1mm或1%/ 1mm。我们在ArcCHECK上的结果证实了AAPM任务组No. 218的指示,而在SRS MapCHECK上,DTA = 1 mm时可能有可接受的识别能力,这表明具有更高空间分辨率的设备,在SBRT中首选,以更好地采样剂量分布,需要更严格的DTA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信