Classification performances of two diode arrays for patient-specific quality assurance of stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments based on absolute dose measurements in phantom
IF 2 4区 医学Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Stefania Linsalata, Jake H. Pensavalle, Franco Perrone, Patrizio Barca, Fabio Di Martino, Fabiola Paiar, Antonio C. Traino
{"title":"Classification performances of two diode arrays for patient-specific quality assurance of stereotactic body radiation therapy treatments based on absolute dose measurements in phantom","authors":"Stefania Linsalata, Jake H. Pensavalle, Franco Perrone, Patrizio Barca, Fabio Di Martino, Fabiola Paiar, Antonio C. Traino","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the rapid growth in the clinical practice, no specific recommendations on pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic body radiation therapy plans have been established.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>In this contest, the study aims to identify optimal gamma analysis criteria and thresholds for the Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK and SRS MapCHECK arrays.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty SBRT plans were delivered on both devices per plan and field-by-field. The measurements were compared with calculations and Gamma Passing Rates (GPRs), obtained using global normalization in absolute dose and 10% threshold, with six different Dose Difference (DD) / Distance To Agreement (DTA) criteria stricter than those universally suggested by the Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 218, were recorded. Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis was performed on GPRs while varying the threshold from 0% to 100%, the agreement between calculations and absolute dose measurements, obtained with a IBA Razor chamber at the isocenter in phantom at different levels (i.e., 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%), being the Ground Truth. Significance of the resulting Areas Under Curve (AUCs) against the random guess was tested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>AUCs obtained with ArcCHECK are generally more significant than with SRS MapCHECK, while those measured field-by-field are more significant than per plan. Within the considered DD/DTA criteria, the most discriminative ones are device-specific, that is, 2%/2 mm or 1%/2 mm for ArcCHECK and 2%/1 mm or 1%/1 mm for SRS MapCHECK.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results on ArcCHECK confirm the indication of the AAPM Task Group No. 218, while for SRS MapCHECK, acceptable discriminating capabilities are possible with DTA = 1 mm, suggesting that devices with native higher spatial resolution, preferred in SBRT for the better sampling of the dose distribution, require tighter DTA.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Despite the rapid growth in the clinical practice, no specific recommendations on pre-treatment patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy-based stereotactic body radiation therapy plans have been established.
Purpose
In this contest, the study aims to identify optimal gamma analysis criteria and thresholds for the Sun Nuclear ArcCHECK and SRS MapCHECK arrays.
Methods
Twenty SBRT plans were delivered on both devices per plan and field-by-field. The measurements were compared with calculations and Gamma Passing Rates (GPRs), obtained using global normalization in absolute dose and 10% threshold, with six different Dose Difference (DD) / Distance To Agreement (DTA) criteria stricter than those universally suggested by the Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 218, were recorded. Receiver Operating Characteristics analysis was performed on GPRs while varying the threshold from 0% to 100%, the agreement between calculations and absolute dose measurements, obtained with a IBA Razor chamber at the isocenter in phantom at different levels (i.e., 1%, 2%, 3%, 4%, and 5%), being the Ground Truth. Significance of the resulting Areas Under Curve (AUCs) against the random guess was tested.
Results
AUCs obtained with ArcCHECK are generally more significant than with SRS MapCHECK, while those measured field-by-field are more significant than per plan. Within the considered DD/DTA criteria, the most discriminative ones are device-specific, that is, 2%/2 mm or 1%/2 mm for ArcCHECK and 2%/1 mm or 1%/1 mm for SRS MapCHECK.
Conclusions
Our results on ArcCHECK confirm the indication of the AAPM Task Group No. 218, while for SRS MapCHECK, acceptable discriminating capabilities are possible with DTA = 1 mm, suggesting that devices with native higher spatial resolution, preferred in SBRT for the better sampling of the dose distribution, require tighter DTA.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic