Comparison of the behavior of human lung epithelial cell lines cultured at the air-liquid interface and assessment of their responses after benzo(a)pyrene exposure
Suen Boulé, Louise Verhaeghe, Dominique Courcot, Yann Landkocz
{"title":"Comparison of the behavior of human lung epithelial cell lines cultured at the air-liquid interface and assessment of their responses after benzo(a)pyrene exposure","authors":"Suen Boulé, Louise Verhaeghe, Dominique Courcot, Yann Landkocz","doi":"10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The biological effects of air pollution are still not well known, due to its complex mixture of particulate and gaseous compounds. <em>In vitro</em> cell culture models exposed at the air-liquid interface (ALI) represent a potential alternative to <em>in vivo</em> experiments to assess the effects of outdoor air pollution. This study compares two bronchial cell lines, Calu-3 and BEAS-2B, and two alveolar cell lines, hAELVi and A549, regarding their capacity to form a tight epithelial cell barrier for a 2-week culture period and metabolize xenobiotics actively. Culture at the air-liquid interface permits the Calu-3 and hAELVi cells to form and maintain a tight epithelial cell barrier with lower permeability to lucifer yellow, greater trans-epithelial electrical resistance, and the presence of <em>Zonula Occludens 1</em> (ZO-1) protein at the membrane, than the BEAS-2B and A549 cells. Exposure to benzo(<em>a</em>)pyrene (B<em>a</em>P) induces the up-regulation of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genes, proteins, and functional activity at the air-liquid interface in all cell lines. So, these results demonstrate that the Calu-3 and the hAELVi cells are the more relevant models to assess the effects of ambient air pollution at the air-liquid interface, forming a tight epithelial cell barrier and being metabolically active.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54423,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology in Vitro","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 106122"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology in Vitro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088723332500116X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The biological effects of air pollution are still not well known, due to its complex mixture of particulate and gaseous compounds. In vitro cell culture models exposed at the air-liquid interface (ALI) represent a potential alternative to in vivo experiments to assess the effects of outdoor air pollution. This study compares two bronchial cell lines, Calu-3 and BEAS-2B, and two alveolar cell lines, hAELVi and A549, regarding their capacity to form a tight epithelial cell barrier for a 2-week culture period and metabolize xenobiotics actively. Culture at the air-liquid interface permits the Calu-3 and hAELVi cells to form and maintain a tight epithelial cell barrier with lower permeability to lucifer yellow, greater trans-epithelial electrical resistance, and the presence of Zonula Occludens 1 (ZO-1) protein at the membrane, than the BEAS-2B and A549 cells. Exposure to benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) induces the up-regulation of CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genes, proteins, and functional activity at the air-liquid interface in all cell lines. So, these results demonstrate that the Calu-3 and the hAELVi cells are the more relevant models to assess the effects of ambient air pollution at the air-liquid interface, forming a tight epithelial cell barrier and being metabolically active.
期刊介绍:
Toxicology in Vitro publishes original research papers and reviews on the application and use of in vitro systems for assessing or predicting the toxic effects of chemicals and elucidating their mechanisms of action. These in vitro techniques include utilizing cell or tissue cultures, isolated cells, tissue slices, subcellular fractions, transgenic cell cultures, and cells from transgenic organisms, as well as in silico modelling. The Journal will focus on investigations that involve the development and validation of new in vitro methods, e.g. for prediction of toxic effects based on traditional and in silico modelling; on the use of methods in high-throughput toxicology and pharmacology; elucidation of mechanisms of toxic action; the application of genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics in toxicology, as well as on comparative studies that characterise the relationship between in vitro and in vivo findings. The Journal strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that focus on the development of in vitro methods, their practical applications and regulatory use (e.g. in the areas of food components cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals). Toxicology in Vitro discourages papers that record reporting on toxicological effects from materials, such as plant extracts or herbal medicines, that have not been chemically characterized.