Noel-Adrian Hollosi , Julie Luise Reimers , Antonio Santacroce , Christoph Fürweger , Markus Kufeld , Anna M.E. Bruynzeel , Joost J.C. Verhoeff , Alexander Muacevic , Helen A. Shih , Felix Ehret
{"title":"Reirradiation with stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas – a systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Noel-Adrian Hollosi , Julie Luise Reimers , Antonio Santacroce , Christoph Fürweger , Markus Kufeld , Anna M.E. Bruynzeel , Joost J.C. Verhoeff , Alexander Muacevic , Helen A. Shih , Felix Ehret","doi":"10.1016/j.ctro.2025.100989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a widely used treatment modality for vestibular schwannomas due to its non-invasive nature and high tumor control rates. However, some patients experience tumor progression after treatment. In this setting, reirradiation with SRS represents a potential treatment option. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the evidence for reirradiation of vestibular schwannomas with SRS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This systematic literature review and meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of reirradiation with SRS for vestibular schwannoma and was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 806 studies were screened and 35 included, comprising 394 reirradiated patients. The median time from first treatment to reirradiation was 45 months (range: 12 – 65 months). Reirradiation with SRS, applying a median marginal/prescription dose of 12 Gy, achieved an estimated local control of 95% (95% confidence interval (CI): 92 – 97%, I<sup>2</sup> = 29.62%, p = 0.10). Trigeminal and facial nerve deterioration rates after repeat SRS were 7% (95% CI: 4 – 10%, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%, p = 0.44) and 6% (95% CI: 3 – 8%, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%, p = 0.53), respectively. Serviceable hearing after reirradiation with SRS was rare (5%, 95% CI: 2 – 8%, I<sup>2</sup> = 0.0%, p = 0.46). Among patients with serviceable hearing before reirradiation, 43% maintained it after treatment (95% CI: 29 – 57%, I<sup>2</sup> = 65.71%, p = 0.00). The risk of bias across all studies was high.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Reirradiation with SRS appears to be a safe and effective salvage treatment for progressive vestibular schwannomas. Prospective studies are warranted to define the optimal dose, timing, and dose constraints for reirradiation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10342,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 100989"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405630825000813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a widely used treatment modality for vestibular schwannomas due to its non-invasive nature and high tumor control rates. However, some patients experience tumor progression after treatment. In this setting, reirradiation with SRS represents a potential treatment option. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the evidence for reirradiation of vestibular schwannomas with SRS.
Methods
This systematic literature review and meta-analysis investigates the efficacy and safety of reirradiation with SRS for vestibular schwannoma and was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).
Results
A total of 806 studies were screened and 35 included, comprising 394 reirradiated patients. The median time from first treatment to reirradiation was 45 months (range: 12 – 65 months). Reirradiation with SRS, applying a median marginal/prescription dose of 12 Gy, achieved an estimated local control of 95% (95% confidence interval (CI): 92 – 97%, I2 = 29.62%, p = 0.10). Trigeminal and facial nerve deterioration rates after repeat SRS were 7% (95% CI: 4 – 10%, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.44) and 6% (95% CI: 3 – 8%, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.53), respectively. Serviceable hearing after reirradiation with SRS was rare (5%, 95% CI: 2 – 8%, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.46). Among patients with serviceable hearing before reirradiation, 43% maintained it after treatment (95% CI: 29 – 57%, I2 = 65.71%, p = 0.00). The risk of bias across all studies was high.
Conclusion
Reirradiation with SRS appears to be a safe and effective salvage treatment for progressive vestibular schwannomas. Prospective studies are warranted to define the optimal dose, timing, and dose constraints for reirradiation.