Garrett O. Stanford , Susana Ferreira , Craig E. Landry , Ben Blachly
{"title":"Economic valuation of ecosystem services and natural infrastructure: A quantitative review of the literature","authors":"Garrett O. Stanford , Susana Ferreira , Craig E. Landry , Ben Blachly","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Natural infrastructure is increasingly being recognized as a viable alternative or complement to traditional ‘grey’ infrastructure in addressing global infrastructural needs. From a policy design perspective, selecting the optimal strategy among alternatives requires complete knowledge of the costs and benefits associated with each option. Unlike traditional infrastructure, natural infrastructure delivers a host of ecosystem services that may be difficult to quantify and monetize. Markets do not exist for many of the ecosystem services associated with natural infrastructure, so monetizing the suite of benefits requires specialized techniques from the field of nonmarket valuation. In this paper we use bibliometric techniques to systematically review the literature on economic valuation of ecosystem services, natural infrastructure and, at their intersection, ecosystem services provided by natural infrastructure. With a combination of machine learning and keyword matching, we extract 6,796 relevant articles published between 1990 and 2023 from the Web of Science database. They reveal a dramatic increase in economic valuation studies —especially in the last fifteen years, with a prominent focus on recreation and tourism ecosystem services, marine infrastructure and stated preference valuation methods. We also identify knowledge gaps in terms of geographical coverage, ecosystem services, natural infrastructure, and valuation methods considered, and we provide suggestions for filling these gaps.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51312,"journal":{"name":"Ecosystem Services","volume":"75 ","pages":"Article 101754"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecosystem Services","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212041625000580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Natural infrastructure is increasingly being recognized as a viable alternative or complement to traditional ‘grey’ infrastructure in addressing global infrastructural needs. From a policy design perspective, selecting the optimal strategy among alternatives requires complete knowledge of the costs and benefits associated with each option. Unlike traditional infrastructure, natural infrastructure delivers a host of ecosystem services that may be difficult to quantify and monetize. Markets do not exist for many of the ecosystem services associated with natural infrastructure, so monetizing the suite of benefits requires specialized techniques from the field of nonmarket valuation. In this paper we use bibliometric techniques to systematically review the literature on economic valuation of ecosystem services, natural infrastructure and, at their intersection, ecosystem services provided by natural infrastructure. With a combination of machine learning and keyword matching, we extract 6,796 relevant articles published between 1990 and 2023 from the Web of Science database. They reveal a dramatic increase in economic valuation studies —especially in the last fifteen years, with a prominent focus on recreation and tourism ecosystem services, marine infrastructure and stated preference valuation methods. We also identify knowledge gaps in terms of geographical coverage, ecosystem services, natural infrastructure, and valuation methods considered, and we provide suggestions for filling these gaps.
在解决全球基础设施需求方面,自然基础设施越来越被认为是传统“灰色”基础设施的可行替代或补充。从策略设计的角度来看,在备选方案中选择最优策略需要完全了解与每个选项相关的成本和收益。与传统基础设施不同,自然基础设施提供了大量生态系统服务,这些服务可能难以量化和货币化。与自然基础设施相关的许多生态系统服务并不存在市场,因此将一系列利益货币化需要非市场评估领域的专门技术。在本文中,我们使用文献计量学技术系统地回顾了生态系统服务、自然基础设施以及自然基础设施提供的生态系统服务的经济价值。结合机器学习和关键词匹配,我们从Web of Science数据库中提取了1990年至2023年间发表的6796篇相关文章。它们揭示了经济评估研究的急剧增加——特别是在过去的15年里,主要关注娱乐和旅游生态系统服务、海洋基础设施和声明偏好评估方法。我们还确定了地理覆盖、生态系统服务、自然基础设施和评估方法方面的知识差距,并提出了填补这些差距的建议。
期刊介绍:
Ecosystem Services is an international, interdisciplinary journal that is associated with the Ecosystem Services Partnership (ESP). The journal is dedicated to exploring the science, policy, and practice related to ecosystem services, which are the various ways in which ecosystems contribute to human well-being, both directly and indirectly.
Ecosystem Services contributes to the broader goal of ensuring that the benefits of ecosystems are recognized, valued, and sustainably managed for the well-being of current and future generations. The journal serves as a platform for scholars, practitioners, policymakers, and other stakeholders to share their findings and insights, fostering collaboration and innovation in the field of ecosystem services.