R. Craig , S.E. Nour , L. Blake , B. Carvalho , J. Kua , J.E. O’Carroll
{"title":"Racial and ethnic disparities in postpartum pain: a systematic review","authors":"R. Craig , S.E. Nour , L. Blake , B. Carvalho , J. Kua , J.E. O’Carroll","doi":"10.1016/j.ijoa.2025.104736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia exist globally. However, little is known about disparities in postpartum pain assessment, intensity, and treatment. These disparities are complex and may be influenced by interlinked factors including social determinants of health. We aimed to review the evidence of disparity related to pain in the postpartum period.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review to systematically summarise literature related to racial and ethnic disparity in postpartum pain frequency assessment, severity and opioid prescribing. Relevant observational studies were identified from a previous systematic review and supplementary reference screening.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Eight observational studies involving 22,259 patients were included. All included studies were conducted in the United States (n=7) or the United Kingdom (n=1). Five examined pain after caesarean delivery, and three assessed all delivery modes. Studies showed disparities in reporting of pain, with higher pain scores reported by Black and Hispanic patients when compared with White patients. Black patients were also less likely to receive equivalent analgesic medication doses when compared with White patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Racial and ethnic disparities persist in pain frequency assessment, intensity and analgesic prescribing during the postpartum period. Further research is needed to elucidate the reasons underpinning these disparities, particularly the role of structural and institutional factors, to guide the development of equitable patient-centred approaches to minimise them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14250,"journal":{"name":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","volume":"64 ","pages":"Article 104736"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of obstetric anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959289X25003280","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Racial and ethnic disparities in obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia exist globally. However, little is known about disparities in postpartum pain assessment, intensity, and treatment. These disparities are complex and may be influenced by interlinked factors including social determinants of health. We aimed to review the evidence of disparity related to pain in the postpartum period.
Methods
We conducted a systematic review to systematically summarise literature related to racial and ethnic disparity in postpartum pain frequency assessment, severity and opioid prescribing. Relevant observational studies were identified from a previous systematic review and supplementary reference screening.
Results
Eight observational studies involving 22,259 patients were included. All included studies were conducted in the United States (n=7) or the United Kingdom (n=1). Five examined pain after caesarean delivery, and three assessed all delivery modes. Studies showed disparities in reporting of pain, with higher pain scores reported by Black and Hispanic patients when compared with White patients. Black patients were also less likely to receive equivalent analgesic medication doses when compared with White patients.
Conclusions
Racial and ethnic disparities persist in pain frequency assessment, intensity and analgesic prescribing during the postpartum period. Further research is needed to elucidate the reasons underpinning these disparities, particularly the role of structural and institutional factors, to guide the development of equitable patient-centred approaches to minimise them.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia is the only journal publishing original articles devoted exclusively to obstetric anesthesia and bringing together all three of its principal components; anesthesia care for operative delivery and the perioperative period, pain relief in labour and care of the critically ill obstetric patient.
• Original research (both clinical and laboratory), short reports and case reports will be considered.
• The journal also publishes invited review articles and debates on topical and controversial subjects in the area of obstetric anesthesia.
• Articles on related topics such as perinatal physiology and pharmacology and all subjects of importance to obstetric anaesthetists/anesthesiologists are also welcome.
The journal is peer-reviewed by international experts. Scholarship is stressed to include the focus on discovery, application of knowledge across fields, and informing the medical community. Through the peer-review process, we hope to attest to the quality of scholarships and guide the Journal to extend and transform knowledge in this important and expanding area.