How dissimilar synonyms affect the results of experiments based on fine-grained knowledge co-occurrence networks

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Jinqing Yang , Xingyu Luo , Ruhan Yang , Zhifeng Liu , Shengzhi Huang
{"title":"How dissimilar synonyms affect the results of experiments based on fine-grained knowledge co-occurrence networks","authors":"Jinqing Yang ,&nbsp;Xingyu Luo ,&nbsp;Ruhan Yang ,&nbsp;Zhifeng Liu ,&nbsp;Shengzhi Huang","doi":"10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Despite efforts to reduce the effects of dissimilar synonyms on the construction of knowledge networks, few researchers have examined the extent to which it affects the results of experiments. In this work, we developed a multi-tiered comparative analysis framework to investigate how the dissimilar synonym issue influences the topology structure and functional dynamics of knowledge networks. Specifically, <em>Pearson</em> correlation analysis was performed to quantify the relationship between topology structure variables in the ontology knowledge network and their counterparts in the raw term-based network. Subsequently, we applied the Levenshtein distance algorithm to assess sequence dissimilarity in the ordinal sequences between variable pairs. Finally, we calculated the difference between the topology variables of the same knowledge node in the two networks. To evaluate the effect of the dissimilar synonym issue, we applied our framework to the scenario of knowledge impact prediction and ranking. The experimental results show that (1) the similarity values of the ordinal sequences of eigenvector centrality, <em>PageRank</em> coefficient, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality variables are respectively 0.410, 0.404, 0.342, and 0.407, which means the dissimilar synonym issue has a considerable effect on the topology structure calculations of knowledge networks; and (2) higher-ranked knowledge nodes show lower overlap rates between the raw term-based knowledge network and the ontology knowledge network, suggesting that the dissimilar synonym issue influences the reliability of detecting high-impact knowledge. (3) in the scenario of knowledge impact prediction, the dissimilar synonym issue has minimal effect on the task performance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50365,"journal":{"name":"Information Processing & Management","volume":"63 1","pages":"Article 104311"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Processing & Management","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306457325002523","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite efforts to reduce the effects of dissimilar synonyms on the construction of knowledge networks, few researchers have examined the extent to which it affects the results of experiments. In this work, we developed a multi-tiered comparative analysis framework to investigate how the dissimilar synonym issue influences the topology structure and functional dynamics of knowledge networks. Specifically, Pearson correlation analysis was performed to quantify the relationship between topology structure variables in the ontology knowledge network and their counterparts in the raw term-based network. Subsequently, we applied the Levenshtein distance algorithm to assess sequence dissimilarity in the ordinal sequences between variable pairs. Finally, we calculated the difference between the topology variables of the same knowledge node in the two networks. To evaluate the effect of the dissimilar synonym issue, we applied our framework to the scenario of knowledge impact prediction and ranking. The experimental results show that (1) the similarity values of the ordinal sequences of eigenvector centrality, PageRank coefficient, betweenness centrality, and closeness centrality variables are respectively 0.410, 0.404, 0.342, and 0.407, which means the dissimilar synonym issue has a considerable effect on the topology structure calculations of knowledge networks; and (2) higher-ranked knowledge nodes show lower overlap rates between the raw term-based knowledge network and the ontology knowledge network, suggesting that the dissimilar synonym issue influences the reliability of detecting high-impact knowledge. (3) in the scenario of knowledge impact prediction, the dissimilar synonym issue has minimal effect on the task performance.
不同同义词如何影响基于细粒度知识共现网络的实验结果
尽管人们努力减少不同同义词对知识网络构建的影响,但很少有研究者研究它对实验结果的影响程度。在这项工作中,我们开发了一个多层次的比较分析框架来研究不同同义词问题如何影响知识网络的拓扑结构和功能动态。具体来说,使用Pearson相关分析来量化本体知识网络中的拓扑结构变量与原始基于术语的网络中的对应变量之间的关系。随后,我们应用Levenshtein距离算法来评估变量对之间有序序列的序列不相似性。最后,我们计算了两种网络中同一知识节点的拓扑变量之差。为了评估不同同义词问题的影响,我们将我们的框架应用于知识影响预测和排名的场景。实验结果表明:(1)特征向量中心性、PageRank系数、中间度中心性和接近度中心性变量的有序序列相似性值分别为0.410、0.404、0.342和0.407,表明异构同义词问题对知识网络拓扑结构计算有相当大的影响;(2)基于原始术语的知识网络与本体知识网络之间的重叠率越低,表明同义词不相似问题影响了高影响力知识检测的可靠性。(3)在知识影响预测场景下,不同同义词问题对任务绩效的影响最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Processing & Management
Information Processing & Management 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
11.60%
发文量
276
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Information Processing and Management is dedicated to publishing cutting-edge original research at the convergence of computing and information science. Our scope encompasses theory, methods, and applications across various domains, including advertising, business, health, information science, information technology marketing, and social computing. We aim to cater to the interests of both primary researchers and practitioners by offering an effective platform for the timely dissemination of advanced and topical issues in this interdisciplinary field. The journal places particular emphasis on original research articles, research survey articles, research method articles, and articles addressing critical applications of research. Join us in advancing knowledge and innovation at the intersection of computing and information science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信