Mortality trends and discrepancies among geographic and demographic factors in the USA: pre-, during and post-pandemic analysis

Siddharth Raj Gupta
{"title":"Mortality trends and discrepancies among geographic and demographic factors in the USA: pre-, during and post-pandemic analysis","authors":"Siddharth Raj Gupta","doi":"10.1016/j.glohj.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Human mortality is affected by a lot of different factors. Geographic and demographic variations are two such criteria that play significant importance in establishing the variation in mortality rate.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The current work uses data collected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 2018 to 2021 to study the dependence of mortality on several parameters such as gender, race, and age group. The analysis looks at all the different causes of death registered in the database and shows how they vary with not only the demographic variables mentioned above but also geographic variables such as states in the USA. The variation in trends pre-, during, and post-pandemic is also investigated. The study undertakes several multi-factorial relations such as location-age group, location-gender, age group-gender, and a blanket study across all the races for 2018‒2021.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Texas, California, and Florida were analyzed to be the states with the most number of deaths for the majority of causes. The study shows that before the pandemic two of the most critical causes of death identified were Atherosclerotic heart disease and Alzheimer's disease which was outnumbered by coronavirus disease 2019 in years 2020 and 2021 for the age groups of 35‒84 years.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The outcome of the study clearly shows the irrational availability of data among different ages, states, and races. In addition, it helps to provide interesting insights into how the mortality trends relate to demographic and geographic factors and point out the discrepancies among them.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73164,"journal":{"name":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"9 2","pages":"Pages 159-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2414644724000666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Human mortality is affected by a lot of different factors. Geographic and demographic variations are two such criteria that play significant importance in establishing the variation in mortality rate.

Methods

The current work uses data collected from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention from 2018 to 2021 to study the dependence of mortality on several parameters such as gender, race, and age group. The analysis looks at all the different causes of death registered in the database and shows how they vary with not only the demographic variables mentioned above but also geographic variables such as states in the USA. The variation in trends pre-, during, and post-pandemic is also investigated. The study undertakes several multi-factorial relations such as location-age group, location-gender, age group-gender, and a blanket study across all the races for 2018‒2021.

Results

Texas, California, and Florida were analyzed to be the states with the most number of deaths for the majority of causes. The study shows that before the pandemic two of the most critical causes of death identified were Atherosclerotic heart disease and Alzheimer's disease which was outnumbered by coronavirus disease 2019 in years 2020 and 2021 for the age groups of 35‒84 years.

Conclusion

The outcome of the study clearly shows the irrational availability of data among different ages, states, and races. In addition, it helps to provide interesting insights into how the mortality trends relate to demographic and geographic factors and point out the discrepancies among them.
美国地理和人口因素之间的死亡率趋势和差异:大流行之前、期间和之后的分析
人类的死亡率受到许多不同因素的影响。地理和人口变化是确定死亡率变化的两个重要标准。方法本研究使用美国疾病控制与预防中心2018 - 2021年的数据,研究死亡率与性别、种族、年龄组等参数的相关性。该分析着眼于数据库中登记的所有不同死因,并显示它们如何随着上述人口变量以及美国各州等地理变量而变化。还调查了大流行之前、期间和之后的趋势变化。该研究涵盖了多个多因素关系,如地点-年龄组、地点-性别、年龄组-性别,并对2018-2021年的所有种族进行了全面研究。结果得克萨斯州、加利福尼亚州和佛罗里达州被分析为大多数原因导致死亡人数最多的州。该研究表明,在大流行之前,确定的两种最重要的死亡原因是动脉粥样硬化性心脏病和阿尔茨海默病,在2020年和2021年,35-84岁年龄组的冠状病毒病人数超过了冠状病毒病2019。结论研究结果清楚地表明,不同年龄、州和种族的数据可得性不合理。此外,它有助于提供关于死亡率趋势与人口和地理因素之间关系的有趣见解,并指出它们之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Global health journal (Amsterdam, Netherlands) Public Health and Health Policy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信