Haley Parzonko , Roberta Sonnino , Lada Timotijevic
{"title":"‘Beyond inviting to the table’: Engaging the farming community in food system governance in the US and the UK","authors":"Haley Parzonko , Roberta Sonnino , Lada Timotijevic","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Recent debates on transforming the food system toward more sustainable outcomes are increasingly emphasizing the need for participatory and inclusive governance models. In this context, mechanisms such as Food Policy Groups (FPGs), which are designed to enhance the participation of different food system actors, are generally considered critical levers to achieve democratic objectives in food systems. While their transformative capacity and participatory potential have been widely emphasized, the specific mechanisms and strategies that can enable or limit their inclusive potential have remained under-explored. To fill this gap, this article examines the dynamics of inclusion that shape stakeholder participation in FPGs through an in-depth examination of one key stakeholder group: the farming community. Data collected on 25 FPGs from the US and the UK are analyzed through a focus on the interplay between three critical dimensions of stakeholder participation: (i) the “who”, (ii) the “how” and (iii) the “context” (i.e., enablers and barriers to participation). This analysis shows that a range of context-specific dynamics shape participant composition and engagement approaches, while also creating varying opportunities and constraints that influence stakeholder participation. We conclude that for stakeholder engagement strategies to be meaningfully inclusive and sustainable over time, they need to entail dynamic, adaptive and place-based approaches that respond to the needs and circumstances of different stakeholders.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104367"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001678","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Recent debates on transforming the food system toward more sustainable outcomes are increasingly emphasizing the need for participatory and inclusive governance models. In this context, mechanisms such as Food Policy Groups (FPGs), which are designed to enhance the participation of different food system actors, are generally considered critical levers to achieve democratic objectives in food systems. While their transformative capacity and participatory potential have been widely emphasized, the specific mechanisms and strategies that can enable or limit their inclusive potential have remained under-explored. To fill this gap, this article examines the dynamics of inclusion that shape stakeholder participation in FPGs through an in-depth examination of one key stakeholder group: the farming community. Data collected on 25 FPGs from the US and the UK are analyzed through a focus on the interplay between three critical dimensions of stakeholder participation: (i) the “who”, (ii) the “how” and (iii) the “context” (i.e., enablers and barriers to participation). This analysis shows that a range of context-specific dynamics shape participant composition and engagement approaches, while also creating varying opportunities and constraints that influence stakeholder participation. We conclude that for stakeholder engagement strategies to be meaningfully inclusive and sustainable over time, they need to entail dynamic, adaptive and place-based approaches that respond to the needs and circumstances of different stakeholders.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.