{"title":"The dynamics within urban infrastructure: Tokyo’s water supply from the 1870s to the present","authors":"Aobo Ran","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The dynamic between political regimes and infrastructure development remains central to debates, especially regarding the tension between modernization and tradition. Over the past century, Tokyo’s water supply has changed dramatically, transitioning from the feudal Tokugawa shogunate through constitutional monarchy and wartime militarism to post‐war democratization. This paper examines how regimes in each of these periods impact on Tokyo’s water supply system, and reveals the complex interplay between the political landscape, technological modernization, and water as material infrastructure. This paper argues that Tokyo’s water supply system evolves neither along a linear path of centralization nor decentralization but instead demonstrates dynamic politics across different periods. Tokyo’s water supply embodying multi-temporalities of the modern and traditional produces evolving hydrosocial territories. The findings challenge conventional narratives of a strong correlation between political regimes and the trajectory of urban infrastructure. By exploring the dynamics within Tokyo’s water supply system, this paper contributes to the growing literature on infrastructure as a site of political interactions and offers new insights into temporalities and territoriality along with urban infrastructure transition.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 104370"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718525001708","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The dynamic between political regimes and infrastructure development remains central to debates, especially regarding the tension between modernization and tradition. Over the past century, Tokyo’s water supply has changed dramatically, transitioning from the feudal Tokugawa shogunate through constitutional monarchy and wartime militarism to post‐war democratization. This paper examines how regimes in each of these periods impact on Tokyo’s water supply system, and reveals the complex interplay between the political landscape, technological modernization, and water as material infrastructure. This paper argues that Tokyo’s water supply system evolves neither along a linear path of centralization nor decentralization but instead demonstrates dynamic politics across different periods. Tokyo’s water supply embodying multi-temporalities of the modern and traditional produces evolving hydrosocial territories. The findings challenge conventional narratives of a strong correlation between political regimes and the trajectory of urban infrastructure. By exploring the dynamics within Tokyo’s water supply system, this paper contributes to the growing literature on infrastructure as a site of political interactions and offers new insights into temporalities and territoriality along with urban infrastructure transition.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.