Motahareh Tavakolikashi , Lesley B. Gordon , Melissa I. Zelaya , Patricia White , Kalli Varaklis , Mohammad Khasawneh , Yong Wang , Sarah Hallen
{"title":"Opportunities to improve the medical education experience in an interprofessional educational Setting: An application of concept mapping","authors":"Motahareh Tavakolikashi , Lesley B. Gordon , Melissa I. Zelaya , Patricia White , Kalli Varaklis , Mohammad Khasawneh , Yong Wang , Sarah Hallen","doi":"10.1016/j.xjep.2025.100759","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The Interprofessional Partnership to Advance Care and Education (iPACE™) model was developed and piloted on an Internal Medicine (IM) unit at Maine Medical Center to promote interprofessional care and education. Although there were many benefits of this care model, residents had multiple concerns that limited model acceptance. Concept Mapping (CM) was identified to further explore, understand, and address these concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>CM was applied to explore IM resident and faculty perceptions of what would make IP experiences, such as iPACE™, more valuable to increase their acceptability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Sixty-four IM faculty and residents were recruited. They completed the following statement: “<em>Interprofessional educational experiences, such as iPACE™, add more value to medical education when _______”.</em> Following the CM steps, the study utilized 2 online surveys and 2 focus groups.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Response rates for two surveys were 38 % and 23 % and focus groups were capped at 15 participants. The 43 generated statements were grouped into 5 clusters and participants named them as follows: (1) Building systems that promote efficiency, (2) Values patient/care team wellbeing, (3) Dynamic and engaging interprofessional team rounds, (4) Supportive education integrated into daily experience for all, and (5) Setting expectations for experiential and formal education. Cluster 1 was rated as having highest importance with an average of 4.5/5 and statements in this cluster focused on resources and processes that make rounds more efficient, flexible, and effective.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study suggests that IM residents and faculty value IP educational experiences when there is faculty buy-in and when they minimize perceived care inefficiencies and administrative burdens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37998,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100759"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interprofessional Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405452625000229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The Interprofessional Partnership to Advance Care and Education (iPACE™) model was developed and piloted on an Internal Medicine (IM) unit at Maine Medical Center to promote interprofessional care and education. Although there were many benefits of this care model, residents had multiple concerns that limited model acceptance. Concept Mapping (CM) was identified to further explore, understand, and address these concerns.
Objectives
CM was applied to explore IM resident and faculty perceptions of what would make IP experiences, such as iPACE™, more valuable to increase their acceptability.
Methods
Sixty-four IM faculty and residents were recruited. They completed the following statement: “Interprofessional educational experiences, such as iPACE™, add more value to medical education when _______”. Following the CM steps, the study utilized 2 online surveys and 2 focus groups.
Results
Response rates for two surveys were 38 % and 23 % and focus groups were capped at 15 participants. The 43 generated statements were grouped into 5 clusters and participants named them as follows: (1) Building systems that promote efficiency, (2) Values patient/care team wellbeing, (3) Dynamic and engaging interprofessional team rounds, (4) Supportive education integrated into daily experience for all, and (5) Setting expectations for experiential and formal education. Cluster 1 was rated as having highest importance with an average of 4.5/5 and statements in this cluster focused on resources and processes that make rounds more efficient, flexible, and effective.
Conclusion
This study suggests that IM residents and faculty value IP educational experiences when there is faculty buy-in and when they minimize perceived care inefficiencies and administrative burdens.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, a quarterly online-only journal, provides innovative ideas for interprofessional educators and practitioners through peer-reviewed articles and reports. Each issue examines current issues and trends in interprofessional healthcare topics, offering progressive solutions to the challenges facing the profession. The Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice (JIEP) is affiliated with University of Nebraska Medical Center and the official journal of National Academies of Practice (NAP) and supports its mission to serve the public and the health profession by advancing education, policy, practice & research.