Felix C. Oettl , Aaron I. Weinblatt , Brian Chalmers , David Kolin , Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
{"title":"Developing and validating machine learning models to predict acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty","authors":"Felix C. Oettl , Aaron I. Weinblatt , Brian Chalmers , David Kolin , Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.07.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Adequate implant inventory management can improve efficiency, storage space, and result in cost savings in arthroplasty. This study investigates if the prediction of cup size in elective primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) cound be improved with the use of advanced machine learning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the arthroplasty registry of a single institution, we identified 30,583 patients who underwent primary THA between 2016 and 2024. No data was missing or incomplete. A total of 9 parameters readily available preoperatively were included as potential predictor variables. The data corpus was partitioned into training (80 %) and hold-out test (20 %) samples. Two distinct machine learning models were trained on regression tasks. The models were technically evaluated utilizing Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to assess alignment with implanted cup. 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated via bootstrapping. Real world useability was assessed by the percent of correct predictions within ±2 mm from implanted cup.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The quantile regression forest outperformed the explainable boosted machine (EBM) in terms of MAE (1.69 [95 % CI 1.64, 1.73] vs 1.73 [1.69, 1.77]) and real-world usability, with an accuracy of 82.85 % within ±2 mm and 97.27 % within ±4 mm. The EBM outperformed the QRF by RMSE and Spearman Correlation coefficient, weighing outliers heavier. The most important factors in order were Sex, height, age, weight, surgical approach and BMI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Machine learning models can predict implant sizing with very high accuracy based on a few metrics available preoperatively. This model can help decrease overall cost of THA by improving orthopaedic manufacturers' supply chains and hospitals’ inventory management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 349-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25002867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims
Adequate implant inventory management can improve efficiency, storage space, and result in cost savings in arthroplasty. This study investigates if the prediction of cup size in elective primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) cound be improved with the use of advanced machine learning.
Methods
Using the arthroplasty registry of a single institution, we identified 30,583 patients who underwent primary THA between 2016 and 2024. No data was missing or incomplete. A total of 9 parameters readily available preoperatively were included as potential predictor variables. The data corpus was partitioned into training (80 %) and hold-out test (20 %) samples. Two distinct machine learning models were trained on regression tasks. The models were technically evaluated utilizing Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to assess alignment with implanted cup. 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated via bootstrapping. Real world useability was assessed by the percent of correct predictions within ±2 mm from implanted cup.
Results
The quantile regression forest outperformed the explainable boosted machine (EBM) in terms of MAE (1.69 [95 % CI 1.64, 1.73] vs 1.73 [1.69, 1.77]) and real-world usability, with an accuracy of 82.85 % within ±2 mm and 97.27 % within ±4 mm. The EBM outperformed the QRF by RMSE and Spearman Correlation coefficient, weighing outliers heavier. The most important factors in order were Sex, height, age, weight, surgical approach and BMI.
Conclusion
Machine learning models can predict implant sizing with very high accuracy based on a few metrics available preoperatively. This model can help decrease overall cost of THA by improving orthopaedic manufacturers' supply chains and hospitals’ inventory management.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.