Developing and validating machine learning models to predict acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Felix C. Oettl , Aaron I. Weinblatt , Brian Chalmers , David Kolin , Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle
{"title":"Developing and validating machine learning models to predict acetabular cup size in total hip arthroplasty","authors":"Felix C. Oettl ,&nbsp;Aaron I. Weinblatt ,&nbsp;Brian Chalmers ,&nbsp;David Kolin ,&nbsp;Alejandro Gonzalez Della Valle","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.07.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Adequate implant inventory management can improve efficiency, storage space, and result in cost savings in arthroplasty. This study investigates if the prediction of cup size in elective primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) cound be improved with the use of advanced machine learning.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using the arthroplasty registry of a single institution, we identified 30,583 patients who underwent primary THA between 2016 and 2024. No data was missing or incomplete. A total of 9 parameters readily available preoperatively were included as potential predictor variables. The data corpus was partitioned into training (80 %) and hold-out test (20 %) samples. Two distinct machine learning models were trained on regression tasks. The models were technically evaluated utilizing Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to assess alignment with implanted cup. 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated via bootstrapping. Real world useability was assessed by the percent of correct predictions within ±2 mm from implanted cup.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The quantile regression forest outperformed the explainable boosted machine (EBM) in terms of MAE (1.69 [95 % CI 1.64, 1.73] vs 1.73 [1.69, 1.77]) and real-world usability, with an accuracy of 82.85 % within ±2 mm and 97.27 % within ±4 mm. The EBM outperformed the QRF by RMSE and Spearman Correlation coefficient, weighing outliers heavier. The most important factors in order were Sex, height, age, weight, surgical approach and BMI.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Machine learning models can predict implant sizing with very high accuracy based on a few metrics available preoperatively. This model can help decrease overall cost of THA by improving orthopaedic manufacturers' supply chains and hospitals’ inventory management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 349-352"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X25002867","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Adequate implant inventory management can improve efficiency, storage space, and result in cost savings in arthroplasty. This study investigates if the prediction of cup size in elective primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) cound be improved with the use of advanced machine learning.

Methods

Using the arthroplasty registry of a single institution, we identified 30,583 patients who underwent primary THA between 2016 and 2024. No data was missing or incomplete. A total of 9 parameters readily available preoperatively were included as potential predictor variables. The data corpus was partitioned into training (80 %) and hold-out test (20 %) samples. Two distinct machine learning models were trained on regression tasks. The models were technically evaluated utilizing Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE). Spearman correlation coefficient was calculated to assess alignment with implanted cup. 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) were calculated via bootstrapping. Real world useability was assessed by the percent of correct predictions within ±2 mm from implanted cup.

Results

The quantile regression forest outperformed the explainable boosted machine (EBM) in terms of MAE (1.69 [95 % CI 1.64, 1.73] vs 1.73 [1.69, 1.77]) and real-world usability, with an accuracy of 82.85 % within ±2 mm and 97.27 % within ±4 mm. The EBM outperformed the QRF by RMSE and Spearman Correlation coefficient, weighing outliers heavier. The most important factors in order were Sex, height, age, weight, surgical approach and BMI.

Conclusion

Machine learning models can predict implant sizing with very high accuracy based on a few metrics available preoperatively. This model can help decrease overall cost of THA by improving orthopaedic manufacturers' supply chains and hospitals’ inventory management.
开发和验证机器学习模型来预测全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯的大小
目的充分的假体库存管理可以提高关节置换术的效率和存储空间,并节省成本。本研究探讨了是否可以通过使用先进的机器学习来改进选择性初级全髋关节置换术(THA)中罩杯大小的预测。方法使用单一机构的关节置换术登记,我们确定了2016年至2024年间接受原发性THA的30,583例患者。没有数据丢失或不完整。共有9个术前可用的参数被纳入潜在的预测变量。数据语料库分为训练样本(80%)和保留测试样本(20%)。在回归任务上训练了两个不同的机器学习模型。采用均方根误差(RMSE)和平均绝对误差(MAE)对模型进行技术评价。计算Spearman相关系数来评估与植入杯的对齐。95%置信区间(95% CI)通过bootstrapping计算。真实世界的可用性是通过距离植入杯子±2mm内的正确预测百分比来评估的。结果分位数回归森林在MAE (1.69 [95% CI 1.64, 1.73] vs 1.73[1.69, 1.77])和实际可用性方面优于可解释增强机(EBM),±2 mm范围内的准确率为82.85%,±4 mm范围内的准确率为97.27%。在RMSE和Spearman相关系数方面,EBM优于QRF,对异常值的权重更大。最重要的因素依次为性别、身高、年龄、体重、手术方式和BMI。结论机器学习模型可以根据术前可用的几个指标准确预测种植体的大小。这种模式可以通过改善骨科制造商的供应链和医院的库存管理来帮助降低THA的总体成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信