Are laterality effects present in novel object responses of calves?

IF 2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Chenyu Zhang , Molly Kindell , Rebecca K. Meagher
{"title":"Are laterality effects present in novel object responses of calves?","authors":"Chenyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Molly Kindell ,&nbsp;Rebecca K. Meagher","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2025.106757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Many animals exhibit preferential viewing of fear-inducing stimuli with their left eyes, reflecting cerebral lateralisation in emotion processing. In novel object tests, often used to assess fear, spatial positioning of the objects relative to the animal can vary. This study aimed to investigate visual lateralisation in calves’ responses in novel object tests, evaluate its effectiveness as an indicator of fear, and examine how initial monocular presentation of fear-inducing stimuli impacts fear responses and their reliability. Thirty-six dairy calves underwent a novel object test at six weeks of age and a second at seven weeks of age using a different object, with behavioural responses towards the novel objects recorded. There was no correlation in latency to first contact with novel objects between tests. On average, proportion of time viewing novel objects with the left eye did not significantly differ from the right eye across the two tests, nor did it correlate with latency to first contact with novel objects. The probability of contact with novel objects and latency to first contact with novel objects did not differ based on initial eye with which novel objects were seen, although among calves that showed an avoidance response, they were less likely to have used the right eye for viewing than either the left eye or both eyes just before the locomotor response. Overall, fear responses in calves during repeated novel object tests were inconsistent, and this inconsistency was not clearly attributable to the random presentation of objects to different visual fields. This may suggest either a lack of cerebral lateralisation in fear processing at this age or that alternative methods may be needed to more accurately assess it.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"292 ","pages":"Article 106757"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159125002552","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many animals exhibit preferential viewing of fear-inducing stimuli with their left eyes, reflecting cerebral lateralisation in emotion processing. In novel object tests, often used to assess fear, spatial positioning of the objects relative to the animal can vary. This study aimed to investigate visual lateralisation in calves’ responses in novel object tests, evaluate its effectiveness as an indicator of fear, and examine how initial monocular presentation of fear-inducing stimuli impacts fear responses and their reliability. Thirty-six dairy calves underwent a novel object test at six weeks of age and a second at seven weeks of age using a different object, with behavioural responses towards the novel objects recorded. There was no correlation in latency to first contact with novel objects between tests. On average, proportion of time viewing novel objects with the left eye did not significantly differ from the right eye across the two tests, nor did it correlate with latency to first contact with novel objects. The probability of contact with novel objects and latency to first contact with novel objects did not differ based on initial eye with which novel objects were seen, although among calves that showed an avoidance response, they were less likely to have used the right eye for viewing than either the left eye or both eyes just before the locomotor response. Overall, fear responses in calves during repeated novel object tests were inconsistent, and this inconsistency was not clearly attributable to the random presentation of objects to different visual fields. This may suggest either a lack of cerebral lateralisation in fear processing at this age or that alternative methods may be needed to more accurately assess it.
小腿的新物体反应是否存在侧偏效应?
许多动物表现出偏爱用左眼观看引起恐惧的刺激,这反映了大脑在情绪处理中的偏侧化。在通常用于评估恐惧的新物体测试中,物体相对于动物的空间位置可能会有所不同。本研究旨在探讨小牛在新物体测试中的视觉偏侧反应,评估其作为恐惧指标的有效性,并研究恐惧诱导刺激的初始单眼呈现如何影响恐惧反应及其可靠性。36头奶牛在6周龄时接受了新物体测试,在7周龄时使用不同的物体进行了第二次测试,并记录了它们对新物体的行为反应。在两次测试之间,第一次接触新物体的潜伏期没有相关性。平均而言,在两次测试中,左眼与右眼观察新物体的时间比例没有显著差异,也与首次接触新物体的延迟时间无关。接触新物体的概率和首次接触新物体的延迟时间并没有因最初看到新物体的眼睛而有所不同,尽管在表现出回避反应的小牛中,在运动反应之前使用右眼观看的可能性比使用左眼或双眼观看的可能性要小。总的来说,在重复的新物体测试中,小牛的恐惧反应是不一致的,这种不一致并不能清楚地归因于随机呈现在不同视野中的物体。这可能表明,在这个年龄段,大脑在恐惧处理方面缺乏偏侧化,或者可能需要其他方法来更准确地评估它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信