Novel Consistent Tangent Operator for Runge–Kutta‐Based Explicit Stress Integration for Elasto‐Plastic Models: Application to the Modified Cam Clay Model

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
L. Monforte, M. Rouainia
{"title":"Novel Consistent Tangent Operator for Runge–Kutta‐Based Explicit Stress Integration for Elasto‐Plastic Models: Application to the Modified Cam Clay Model","authors":"L. Monforte, M. Rouainia","doi":"10.1002/nag.70016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Explicit stress integration techniques for elasto‐plastic constitutive models have demonstrated high‐order accuracy, efficiency, and robustness. However, there is a notable absence of a proposed expression for the consistent tangent operator, which is essential to guarantee the quadratic convergence of the Newton–Raphson algorithm used in solving the global problem. Therefore, when employing explicit stress integration, the typical convergence rate of the global problem is linear. In this work, we introduce a novel expression for the consistent tangent operator specifically formulated for Runge–Kutta‐based explicit stress integration techniques. The Gauss point integration algorithm involves substepping, finding the intersection of the stress path with the yield surface, and implementing a yield surface drift correction algorithm. All of these numerical procedures are linearised and integrated into the expression of the consistent tangent matrix. The assessment of the consistent tangent matrix expression is conducted through a various element tests and finite element simulations using the Modified Cam Clay model. In all the simulations, a quadratic rate of asymptotic convergence is consistently achieved with the iterative solver used in the global problem. The proposed consistent tangent operator significantly enhances the computational efficiency of explicit stress integration techniques, positioning them as a viable, high‐order alternative to implicit stress integration.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Explicit stress integration techniques for elasto‐plastic constitutive models have demonstrated high‐order accuracy, efficiency, and robustness. However, there is a notable absence of a proposed expression for the consistent tangent operator, which is essential to guarantee the quadratic convergence of the Newton–Raphson algorithm used in solving the global problem. Therefore, when employing explicit stress integration, the typical convergence rate of the global problem is linear. In this work, we introduce a novel expression for the consistent tangent operator specifically formulated for Runge–Kutta‐based explicit stress integration techniques. The Gauss point integration algorithm involves substepping, finding the intersection of the stress path with the yield surface, and implementing a yield surface drift correction algorithm. All of these numerical procedures are linearised and integrated into the expression of the consistent tangent matrix. The assessment of the consistent tangent matrix expression is conducted through a various element tests and finite element simulations using the Modified Cam Clay model. In all the simulations, a quadratic rate of asymptotic convergence is consistently achieved with the iterative solver used in the global problem. The proposed consistent tangent operator significantly enhances the computational efficiency of explicit stress integration techniques, positioning them as a viable, high‐order alternative to implicit stress integration.
基于Runge-Kutta的弹塑性模型显式应力积分的新型一致切线算子:在修正凸轮粘土模型中的应用
弹塑性本构模型的显式应力积分技术已经证明了高阶精度、效率和鲁棒性。然而,值得注意的是,没有提出一致切算子的表达式,这对于保证用于解决全局问题的牛顿-拉夫森算法的二次收敛是必不可少的。因此,当采用显式应力积分时,全局问题的典型收敛速度是线性的。在这项工作中,我们引入了一种新的一致切算子表达式,专门为基于龙格-库塔的显式应力积分技术制定。高斯点积分算法包括子步进,寻找应力路径与屈服面相交,并实现屈服面漂移校正算法。所有这些数值过程都被线性化并积分到一致切矩阵的表达式中。采用改进的Cam Clay模型,通过各种单元试验和有限元模拟,对相切矩阵表达式的一致性进行了评估。在所有的模拟中,使用全局问题的迭代求解器一致地实现了二次渐近收敛速率。所提出的一致切线算子显著提高了显式应力积分技术的计算效率,使其成为隐式应力积分的一种可行的高阶替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信