Peter Scalia,Gabriel Levin,Tomer Bar Noy,Shannon Salvador,Melica Nourmoussavi Brodeur,Walter Gotlieb,Susie Kit Lau
{"title":"Conversion Rate for Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Cancer Surgery.","authors":"Peter Scalia,Gabriel Levin,Tomer Bar Noy,Shannon Salvador,Melica Nourmoussavi Brodeur,Walter Gotlieb,Susie Kit Lau","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our objective was to identify the rate of and reasons for conversion from robotic-assisted surgery to laparotomy for patients with gynecologic cancers. A retrospective analysis was conducted of all consecutive robotic surgeries for gynecologic cancers performed at a tertiary cancer center between December 2007 and December 2022. Data were stratified based on cancer type (endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and \"other\") and body mass index (BMI). Reasons for conversion were categorized as specimen removal, anesthesia-related, organ or vessel injury, advanced metastatic disease, and equipment malfunction. The conversion rate was 2.4% (55/2,328) overall and 0.5% for endometrial cancer after excluding mini-laparotomies performed solely to remove large specimens. The predominant reason for conversion in ovarian cancer was disease invasion into surrounding structures not amenable to robotic resection. No association was found between conversion rates and BMI or age.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Our objective was to identify the rate of and reasons for conversion from robotic-assisted surgery to laparotomy for patients with gynecologic cancers. A retrospective analysis was conducted of all consecutive robotic surgeries for gynecologic cancers performed at a tertiary cancer center between December 2007 and December 2022. Data were stratified based on cancer type (endometrial, ovarian, cervical, and "other") and body mass index (BMI). Reasons for conversion were categorized as specimen removal, anesthesia-related, organ or vessel injury, advanced metastatic disease, and equipment malfunction. The conversion rate was 2.4% (55/2,328) overall and 0.5% for endometrial cancer after excluding mini-laparotomies performed solely to remove large specimens. The predominant reason for conversion in ovarian cancer was disease invasion into surrounding structures not amenable to robotic resection. No association was found between conversion rates and BMI or age.
期刊介绍:
"Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics.
"Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.