Hyperphosphatemia in patients on hemodialysis may be driven by the consumption of ultraprocessed foods.

Andrea C Sczip, Jyana G Morais, Adaiane Calegari, Tatiana S Kruger, Jorgiane C Oliveira, Natália K Scatone, Rafaela G Dos Santos, Fellype C Barreto, Fabiana B Nerbass
{"title":"Hyperphosphatemia in patients on hemodialysis may be driven by the consumption of ultraprocessed foods.","authors":"Andrea C Sczip, Jyana G Morais, Adaiane Calegari, Tatiana S Kruger, Jorgiane C Oliveira, Natália K Scatone, Rafaela G Dos Santos, Fellype C Barreto, Fabiana B Nerbass","doi":"10.1053/j.jrn.2025.07.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the role of dietary diversity of unprocessed and minimally processed foods and the intake of ultraprocessed foods (UPFs), along with their respective phosphorus source subgroups, in hyperphosphatemia among patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted in seven dialysis units in Southern Brazil. Two validated questionnaires were used: a dietary diversity questionnaire to assess the intake of unprocessed and minimally processed foods, and a UPFs consumption questionnaire to evaluate the intake of UPFs. Dietary intake was assessed on two separate days-one dialysis day and one non-dialysis day. From these instruments, scores were calculated for overall dietary diversity, total UPFs consumption, and phosphorus sources subgroups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 297 patients participated (age: 52.1±14.1 years; 57.9% men; 42% with hyperphosphatemia). While unprocessed and minimally processed phosphorus sources were more commonly consumed, multivariate analysis revealed that UPFs, particularly those from animal-based sources, were independently associated with hyperphosphatemia. Each one-point increase in intake of UPFs scores corresponded to an increased likelihood of hyperphosphatemia: 25% for total UPF, 76% for animal-based UPFs, and 24% for other UPFs sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that although phosphorus sources from UPFs were consumed less frequently than those from unprocessed and minimally processed foods, consumption of UPFs - especially those from animal-based sources - was an independent determinant of hyperphosphatemia. These results highlight the need for dietary interventions that prioritize healthy food choices in the management of hyperphosphatemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":520689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal nutrition : the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2025.07.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to investigate the role of dietary diversity of unprocessed and minimally processed foods and the intake of ultraprocessed foods (UPFs), along with their respective phosphorus source subgroups, in hyperphosphatemia among patients on chronic hemodialysis (HD).

Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter cross-sectional study conducted in seven dialysis units in Southern Brazil. Two validated questionnaires were used: a dietary diversity questionnaire to assess the intake of unprocessed and minimally processed foods, and a UPFs consumption questionnaire to evaluate the intake of UPFs. Dietary intake was assessed on two separate days-one dialysis day and one non-dialysis day. From these instruments, scores were calculated for overall dietary diversity, total UPFs consumption, and phosphorus sources subgroups.

Results: A total of 297 patients participated (age: 52.1±14.1 years; 57.9% men; 42% with hyperphosphatemia). While unprocessed and minimally processed phosphorus sources were more commonly consumed, multivariate analysis revealed that UPFs, particularly those from animal-based sources, were independently associated with hyperphosphatemia. Each one-point increase in intake of UPFs scores corresponded to an increased likelihood of hyperphosphatemia: 25% for total UPF, 76% for animal-based UPFs, and 24% for other UPFs sources.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that although phosphorus sources from UPFs were consumed less frequently than those from unprocessed and minimally processed foods, consumption of UPFs - especially those from animal-based sources - was an independent determinant of hyperphosphatemia. These results highlight the need for dietary interventions that prioritize healthy food choices in the management of hyperphosphatemia.

血液透析患者的高磷血症可能是由食用超加工食品引起的。
目的:我们旨在研究未加工食品和最低加工食品的饮食多样性以及超加工食品(upf)的摄入量及其各自的磷源亚组在慢性血液透析(HD)患者高磷血症中的作用。方法:这是一项在巴西南部7个透析单位进行的多中心横断面研究的二次分析。使用了两份有效问卷:一份膳食多样性问卷用于评估未加工和最低加工食品的摄入量,一份UPFs消费问卷用于评估UPFs的摄入量。饮食摄入分别在透析日和非透析日进行评估。根据这些工具,计算总体膳食多样性、upf总消耗量和磷源亚组的得分。结果:共297例患者参与,年龄:52.1±14.1岁;男性57.9%;42%为高磷血症)。虽然未经加工和最低限度加工的磷源更常被消耗,但多变量分析显示,upf,特别是来自动物源的upf,与高磷血症独立相关。UPF摄入量每增加1分,高磷血症的可能性就会增加:总UPF为25%,动物性UPF为76%,其他UPF来源为24%。结论:我们的研究结果表明,尽管来自UPFs的磷源的消耗频率低于来自未加工和最低加工食品的磷源,但UPFs的消耗-特别是来自动物源的磷源-是高磷血症的独立决定因素。这些结果强调了在高磷血症管理中优先选择健康食物的饮食干预的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信