Artificial intelligence in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm imaging: A systematic review.

IF 7.7
PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-07-23 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000920
Muhammad Ibtsaam Qadir, Jackson A Baril, Michele T Yip-Schneider, Duane Schonlau, Thi Thanh Thoa Tran, C Max Schmidt, Fiona R Kolbinger
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm imaging: A systematic review.","authors":"Muhammad Ibtsaam Qadir, Jackson A Baril, Michele T Yip-Schneider, Duane Schonlau, Thi Thanh Thoa Tran, C Max Schmidt, Fiona R Kolbinger","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Based on the Fukuoka and Kyoto international consensus guidelines, the current clinical management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) largely depends on imaging features. While these criteria are highly sensitive in detecting high-risk IPMN, they lack specificity, resulting in surgical overtreatment. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based medical image analysis has the potential to augment the clinical management of IPMNs by improving diagnostic accuracy. Based on a systematic review of the academic literature on AI in IPMN imaging, 1041 publications were identified of which 25 published studies were included in the analysis. The studies were stratified based on prediction target, underlying data type and imaging modality, patient cohort size, and stage of clinical translation and were subsequently analyzed to identify trends and gaps in the field. Research on AI in IPMN imaging has been increasing in recent years. The majority of studies utilized CT imaging to train computational models. Most studies presented computational models developed on single-center datasets (n = 11,44%) and included less than 250 patients (n = 18,72%). Methodologically, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based algorithms were most commonly used. Thematically, most studies reported models augmenting differential diagnosis (n = 9,36%) or risk stratification (n = 10,40%) rather than IPMN detection (n = 5,20%) or IPMN segmentation (n = 2,8%). This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the research landscape of AI in IPMN imaging. Computational models have potential to enhance the accurate and precise stratification of patients with IPMN. Multicenter collaboration and datasets comprising various modalities are necessary to fully utilize this potential, alongside concerted efforts towards clinical translation.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 7","pages":"e0000920"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the Fukuoka and Kyoto international consensus guidelines, the current clinical management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) largely depends on imaging features. While these criteria are highly sensitive in detecting high-risk IPMN, they lack specificity, resulting in surgical overtreatment. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based medical image analysis has the potential to augment the clinical management of IPMNs by improving diagnostic accuracy. Based on a systematic review of the academic literature on AI in IPMN imaging, 1041 publications were identified of which 25 published studies were included in the analysis. The studies were stratified based on prediction target, underlying data type and imaging modality, patient cohort size, and stage of clinical translation and were subsequently analyzed to identify trends and gaps in the field. Research on AI in IPMN imaging has been increasing in recent years. The majority of studies utilized CT imaging to train computational models. Most studies presented computational models developed on single-center datasets (n = 11,44%) and included less than 250 patients (n = 18,72%). Methodologically, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based algorithms were most commonly used. Thematically, most studies reported models augmenting differential diagnosis (n = 9,36%) or risk stratification (n = 10,40%) rather than IPMN detection (n = 5,20%) or IPMN segmentation (n = 2,8%). This systematic review provides a comprehensive overview of the research landscape of AI in IPMN imaging. Computational models have potential to enhance the accurate and precise stratification of patients with IPMN. Multicenter collaboration and datasets comprising various modalities are necessary to fully utilize this potential, alongside concerted efforts towards clinical translation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工智能在胰腺导管内乳头状粘液瘤成像中的应用:系统综述。
根据Fukuoka和Kyoto国际共识指南,目前导管内乳头状粘液瘤(IPMN)的临床治疗在很大程度上取决于影像学特征。虽然这些标准在检测高风险IPMN方面非常敏感,但它们缺乏特异性,导致手术过度治疗。基于人工智能(AI)的医学图像分析有可能通过提高诊断准确性来增强IPMNs的临床管理。基于对IPMN成像中人工智能学术文献的系统回顾,确定了1041份出版物,其中25份已发表的研究被纳入分析。这些研究根据预测目标、潜在数据类型和成像方式、患者队列大小和临床转化阶段进行分层,随后进行分析,以确定该领域的趋势和差距。近年来,人工智能在IPMN成像中的研究越来越多。大多数研究利用CT成像来训练计算模型。大多数研究采用基于单中心数据集的计算模型(n = 11,44%),纳入的患者少于250例(n = 18,72%)。方法上,最常用的是基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的算法。从主题上讲,大多数研究报告的模型增强了鉴别诊断(n = 9,36%)或风险分层(n = 10,40%),而不是IPMN检测(n = 5,20%)或IPMN分割(n = 2,8%)。本系统综述全面概述了人工智能在IPMN成像中的研究前景。计算模型有可能提高IPMN患者的准确和精确分层。为了充分利用这一潜力,需要多中心合作和包括各种模式的数据集,同时协同努力实现临床翻译。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信