Best practices for multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization in materials and molecular research

IF 18.3 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Víctor Sabanza-Gil, Riccardo Barbano, Daniel Pacheco Gutiérrez, Jeremy S. Luterbacher, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Philippe Schwaller, Loïc Roch
{"title":"Best practices for multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization in materials and molecular research","authors":"Víctor Sabanza-Gil, Riccardo Barbano, Daniel Pacheco Gutiérrez, Jeremy S. Luterbacher, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Philippe Schwaller, Loïc Roch","doi":"10.1038/s43588-025-00822-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization (MFBO) is a promising framework to speed up materials and molecular discovery as sources of information of different accuracies are at hand at increasing cost. Despite its potential use in chemical tasks, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of the many parameters playing a role in MFBO. Here we provide guidelines and recommendations to decide when to use MFBO in experimental settings. We investigate MFBO methods applied to molecules and materials problems. First, we test two different families of acquisition functions in two synthetic problems and study the effect of the informativeness and cost of the approximate function. We use our implementation and guidelines to benchmark three real discovery problems and compare them against their single-fidelity counterparts. Our results may help guide future efforts to implement MFBO as a routine tool in the chemical sciences. Multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization methods are studied on molecular and material discovery tasks, and guidelines are provided to recommend cheaper and informative low-fidelity sources when using this technique in experimental settings.","PeriodicalId":74246,"journal":{"name":"Nature computational science","volume":"5 7","pages":"572-581"},"PeriodicalIF":18.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature computational science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43588-025-00822-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization (MFBO) is a promising framework to speed up materials and molecular discovery as sources of information of different accuracies are at hand at increasing cost. Despite its potential use in chemical tasks, there is a lack of systematic evaluation of the many parameters playing a role in MFBO. Here we provide guidelines and recommendations to decide when to use MFBO in experimental settings. We investigate MFBO methods applied to molecules and materials problems. First, we test two different families of acquisition functions in two synthetic problems and study the effect of the informativeness and cost of the approximate function. We use our implementation and guidelines to benchmark three real discovery problems and compare them against their single-fidelity counterparts. Our results may help guide future efforts to implement MFBO as a routine tool in the chemical sciences. Multi-fidelity Bayesian optimization methods are studied on molecular and material discovery tasks, and guidelines are provided to recommend cheaper and informative low-fidelity sources when using this technique in experimental settings.

Abstract Image

材料和分子研究中多保真贝叶斯优化的最佳实践。
多保真度贝叶斯优化(MFBO)是一种很有前途的框架,可以加速材料和分子的发现,因为不同精度的信息来源在不断增加的成本。尽管它在化学任务中有潜在的用途,但缺乏对在MFBO中起作用的许多参数的系统评价。在这里,我们提供指导和建议,以决定何时在实验环境中使用MFBO。我们研究了MFBO方法在分子和材料问题中的应用。首先,我们在两个综合问题中测试了两个不同的获取函数族,并研究了近似函数的信息量和代价的影响。我们使用我们的实现和指南对三个真实的发现问题进行基准测试,并将它们与单一保真度的对应问题进行比较。我们的结果可能有助于指导未来将MFBO作为化学科学的常规工具来实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信