Addition of liposomal bupivacaine in brachial plexus blocks: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Chung Hin Shing, Fengfeng Wang, Pui Ming Lam, Omar Wai Kiu Tsui, Timmy Chi Wing Chan, Stanley Sau Ching Wong
{"title":"Addition of liposomal bupivacaine in brachial plexus blocks: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Chung Hin Shing, Fengfeng Wang, Pui Ming Lam, Omar Wai Kiu Tsui, Timmy Chi Wing Chan, Stanley Sau Ching Wong","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adding liposomal bupivacaine to brachial plexus block may improve postoperative analgesia after upper limb surgery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the postoperative analgesic efficacy of adding liposomal bupivacaine to brachial plexus block compared with non-liposomal local anesthetic.</p><p><strong>Evidence review: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library up to June 30, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the postoperative pain scores in patients who received liposomal bupivacaine via brachial plexus block were identified. The primary outcome was resting pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale, 0-10) at 24 hours after nerve block injection derived from the random effects model. A mean difference (MD) of 1/10 was considered to represent a minimal clinically important difference in pain scores. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was applied to examine the level of evidence.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>21 RCTs (1478 participants) were included. Liposomal bupivacaine was associated with statistically significant reduction in resting pain scores at 24 hours after nerve block injection compared with non-liposomal local anesthetic (MD=-1.04, 95% CI=-1.54 to -0.53, p<0.001, 95% prediction interval=-3.05 to 0.98). This was associated with significant heterogeneity (Q=107, p<0.001, I²=81%, tau<sup>2</sup>=1.0, 95% CI=0.42 to 2.07) and a low-GRADE rating. Liposomal bupivacaine was also associated with a statistically significant reduction in resting pain scores at 48 hours and 72 hours. Opioid consumption at 0-24 hours, 25-48 hours and 49-72 hours was lower in the liposomal bupivacaine group with statistical significance (p values <0.05). Liposomal bupivacaine was associated with a lower incidence of nausea.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is low-level evidence that liposomal bupivacaine in brachial plexus block may reduce pain intensity after upper limb surgery, but the clinical significance may be limited.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106583","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adding liposomal bupivacaine to brachial plexus block may improve postoperative analgesia after upper limb surgery.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the postoperative analgesic efficacy of adding liposomal bupivacaine to brachial plexus block compared with non-liposomal local anesthetic.

Evidence review: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library up to June 30, 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the postoperative pain scores in patients who received liposomal bupivacaine via brachial plexus block were identified. The primary outcome was resting pain scores (Numerical Rating Scale, 0-10) at 24 hours after nerve block injection derived from the random effects model. A mean difference (MD) of 1/10 was considered to represent a minimal clinically important difference in pain scores. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework was applied to examine the level of evidence.

Findings: 21 RCTs (1478 participants) were included. Liposomal bupivacaine was associated with statistically significant reduction in resting pain scores at 24 hours after nerve block injection compared with non-liposomal local anesthetic (MD=-1.04, 95% CI=-1.54 to -0.53, p<0.001, 95% prediction interval=-3.05 to 0.98). This was associated with significant heterogeneity (Q=107, p<0.001, I²=81%, tau2=1.0, 95% CI=0.42 to 2.07) and a low-GRADE rating. Liposomal bupivacaine was also associated with a statistically significant reduction in resting pain scores at 48 hours and 72 hours. Opioid consumption at 0-24 hours, 25-48 hours and 49-72 hours was lower in the liposomal bupivacaine group with statistical significance (p values <0.05). Liposomal bupivacaine was associated with a lower incidence of nausea.

Conclusions: There is low-level evidence that liposomal bupivacaine in brachial plexus block may reduce pain intensity after upper limb surgery, but the clinical significance may be limited.

臂丛阻滞中添加布比卡因脂质体:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:臂丛神经阻滞中加入布比卡因脂质体可改善上肢手术后的镇痛。目的:比较臂丛神经阻滞术后加布比卡因脂质体与非脂质体局麻的镇痛效果。证据回顾:在PubMed、Web of Science、EMBASE、ClinicalTrials.gov和Cochrane图书馆进行了系统的文献检索,截止到2024年6月30日。随机对照试验(rct)评估了通过臂丛阻滞接受布比卡因脂质体治疗的患者术后疼痛评分。主要终点是神经阻滞注射后24小时静息疼痛评分(数值评定量表,0-10),由随机效应模型得出。1/10的平均差异(MD)被认为代表疼痛评分的最小临床重要差异。采用建议分级、评估、发展和评价(GRADE)框架来检查证据水平。结果:纳入21项随机对照试验(1478名受试者)。与非脂质体局麻药相比,布比卡因脂质体与神经阻滞注射后24小时静息疼痛评分的统计学显著降低相关(MD=-1.04, 95% CI=-1.54至-0.53,p2=1.0, 95% CI=0.42至2.07)和低grade评分。布比卡因脂质体也与48小时和72小时静息疼痛评分的统计学显著降低相关。布比卡因脂质体组0 ~ 24小时、25 ~ 48小时和49 ~ 72小时阿片类药物消耗较低,差异有统计学意义(p值)。结论:臂丛阻滞布比卡因脂质体可减轻上肢手术后疼痛强度,但临床意义有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信