Targeted multinodal thalamic deep brain stimulation for epilepsy: A retrospective case series.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Roger Chang, Brandon Reid, Paul McGeoch, Zoe Lusk, Kevin Graber, Robert Fisher, Josef Parvizi, Vivek Buch
{"title":"Targeted multinodal thalamic deep brain stimulation for epilepsy: A retrospective case series.","authors":"Roger Chang, Brandon Reid, Paul McGeoch, Zoe Lusk, Kevin Graber, Robert Fisher, Josef Parvizi, Vivek Buch","doi":"10.1002/epd2.70070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emerging literature suggests that multi-lead thalamic DBS may be safe and therapeutically beneficial to patients with diffuse or poorly defined epileptic networks; however, more studies are needed to support such off-label methods. Here, in a single-center retrospective, non-controlled observational pilot study, we investigated the off-label use of a multinodal thalamic DBS system in patients with medically refractory and poorly localized epilepsies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Utilizing either a robotic or frame-based technique, we implanted four DBS leads (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) into either bilateral (1) ANT and CM (n = 6 patients) or (2) ANT and PLV (n = 4 patients). In five patients, only bilateral ANT (n = 2) or CM (n = 3) stimulations were applied while in five other patients, bilateral ANT was supplemented with bilateral CM (n = 1) or PLV (n = 4) DBS. The thalamic targets were personalized in each patient based on available clinical or intracranial multi-site thalamic stereoencephalography or scalp EEG evidence. Primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as changes in seizure frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DBS implantation was well tolerated with no intraoperative complications. Only one patient had a post-operative wound-related complication. Average follow-up was 12.4 months (range 3-21 months). Most patients (nine out of 10 patients) experienced a clinically noticeable reduction in seizure frequency, including a subset (two out of 10 patients) who were seizure free. Efficacy was similar in the two-lead and four-lead stimulation groups.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This cohort provides early and preliminary data documenting the feasibility and safety (and clinical utility) of targeted multinodal thalamic DBS for medically refractory, poorly localized epilepsy. As this was not a controlled outcomes study, the clinical efficacy data must be interpreted cautiously. Our findings may motivate larger controlled studies to rigorously evaluate the clinical efficacy of personalized optimization of multinodal configuration in patients with diffuse or poorly defined epileptic networks.</p>","PeriodicalId":50508,"journal":{"name":"Epileptic Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epileptic Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epd2.70070","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Emerging literature suggests that multi-lead thalamic DBS may be safe and therapeutically beneficial to patients with diffuse or poorly defined epileptic networks; however, more studies are needed to support such off-label methods. Here, in a single-center retrospective, non-controlled observational pilot study, we investigated the off-label use of a multinodal thalamic DBS system in patients with medically refractory and poorly localized epilepsies.

Methods: Utilizing either a robotic or frame-based technique, we implanted four DBS leads (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) into either bilateral (1) ANT and CM (n = 6 patients) or (2) ANT and PLV (n = 4 patients). In five patients, only bilateral ANT (n = 2) or CM (n = 3) stimulations were applied while in five other patients, bilateral ANT was supplemented with bilateral CM (n = 1) or PLV (n = 4) DBS. The thalamic targets were personalized in each patient based on available clinical or intracranial multi-site thalamic stereoencephalography or scalp EEG evidence. Primary outcomes were intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as changes in seizure frequency.

Results: DBS implantation was well tolerated with no intraoperative complications. Only one patient had a post-operative wound-related complication. Average follow-up was 12.4 months (range 3-21 months). Most patients (nine out of 10 patients) experienced a clinically noticeable reduction in seizure frequency, including a subset (two out of 10 patients) who were seizure free. Efficacy was similar in the two-lead and four-lead stimulation groups.

Significance: This cohort provides early and preliminary data documenting the feasibility and safety (and clinical utility) of targeted multinodal thalamic DBS for medically refractory, poorly localized epilepsy. As this was not a controlled outcomes study, the clinical efficacy data must be interpreted cautiously. Our findings may motivate larger controlled studies to rigorously evaluate the clinical efficacy of personalized optimization of multinodal configuration in patients with diffuse or poorly defined epileptic networks.

靶向多节丘脑深部脑刺激治疗癫痫:回顾性病例系列。
目的:新出现的文献表明,对于弥漫性或不明确的癫痫网络患者,多铅丘脑DBS可能是安全的,并且在治疗上有益;然而,需要更多的研究来支持这种标签外方法。在此,在一项单中心回顾性、非对照观察性先导研究中,我们调查了多节丘脑DBS系统在医学难治性和局限性差的癫痫患者中的适应症外应用。方法:采用机器人或框架技术,我们将4个DBS导联(Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA)植入双侧(1)ANT和CM (n = 6例)或(2)ANT和PLV (n = 4例)。在5例患者中,仅应用双侧ANT (n = 2)或CM (n = 3)刺激,而在其他5例患者中,双侧ANT辅以双侧CM (n = 1)或PLV (n = 4) DBS。根据现有的临床或颅内多位点丘脑立体脑电图或头皮脑电图证据,对每个患者的丘脑靶点进行个性化治疗。主要结果是术中和术后并发症以及癫痫发作频率的变化。结果:DBS植入术耐受性好,无术中并发症。只有一名患者出现了术后伤口相关并发症。平均随访12.4个月(范围3-21个月)。大多数患者(10名患者中有9名)的癫痫发作频率在临床上明显降低,包括一个子集(10名患者中有2名)没有癫痫发作。两导联和四导联刺激组的效果相似。意义:该队列提供了早期和初步的数据,证明了靶向多节丘脑DBS治疗医学上难治性、局限性差的癫痫的可行性、安全性(和临床实用性)。由于这不是一项对照结果研究,临床疗效数据必须谨慎解释。我们的研究结果可能会激发更大规模的对照研究,以严格评估在弥漫性或不明确的癫痫网络患者中个性化优化多淋巴结配置的临床疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epileptic Disorders
Epileptic Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
8.70%
发文量
138
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epileptic Disorders is the leading forum where all experts and medical studentswho wish to improve their understanding of epilepsy and related disorders can share practical experiences surrounding diagnosis and care, natural history, and management of seizures. Epileptic Disorders is the official E-journal of the International League Against Epilepsy for educational communication. As the journal celebrates its 20th anniversary, it will now be available only as an online version. Its mission is to create educational links between epileptologists and other health professionals in clinical practice and scientists or physicians in research-based institutions. This change is accompanied by an increase in the number of issues per year, from 4 to 6, to ensure regular diffusion of recently published material (high quality Review and Seminar in Epileptology papers; Original Research articles or Case reports of educational value; MultiMedia Teaching Material), to serve the global medical community that cares for those affected by epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信