Jonathan Dalavina, Ivan Peres Costa, Etiene FarahTeixeira de Carvalho, Jonathan Luiz Silva, Soraia Micaela Silva, Luciana Maria Malosá Sampaio
{"title":"Severity Classification of Functional Impairment Based on ICF Qualifiers: A New Proposal for Assessing Individuals With Pulmonary Hypertension.","authors":"Jonathan Dalavina, Ivan Peres Costa, Etiene FarahTeixeira de Carvalho, Jonathan Luiz Silva, Soraia Micaela Silva, Luciana Maria Malosá Sampaio","doi":"10.1002/pri.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) is a chronic condition that leads to progressive functional limitations, making the assessment of functional capacity essential for clinical management. This study aimed to classify PH patients based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) qualifiers using the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and compare this classification with the World Health Organization Functional Classification (WHO-FC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study included 33 individuals with PH. Demographic data, pulmonary function, and 6MWT results were collected. Participants were classified according to ICF qualifiers (ranging from no impairment to complete impairment) and WHO-FC. The association between classifications was tested using Fisher's exact test, considering the conceptual differences between them.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants presented moderate functional impairment, with an average 6MWT distance of 431.5 ± 110 m, equivalent to 68% of the predicted value. Based on ICF qualifiers, 39% of patients had mild impairment, 42% moderate, and 18% severe impairment. However, no significant association was found between ICF qualifiers and WHO-FC, reflecting the distinct conceptual frameworks of these classifications. Unlike WHO-FC, which applies fixed cutoffs, the ICF-based classification provides a more individualized assessment by incorporating the contrast between expected and actual performance in the 6MWT.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of ICF qualifiers enabled a more specific evaluation of functional capacity in PH patients, complementing rather than replacing WHO-FC. This approach allows for a more individualized assessment, supporting targeted rehabilitation strategies and improving clinical decision-making in PH management.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 3","pages":"e70090"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) is a chronic condition that leads to progressive functional limitations, making the assessment of functional capacity essential for clinical management. This study aimed to classify PH patients based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) qualifiers using the Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT) and compare this classification with the World Health Organization Functional Classification (WHO-FC).
Methods: This observational study included 33 individuals with PH. Demographic data, pulmonary function, and 6MWT results were collected. Participants were classified according to ICF qualifiers (ranging from no impairment to complete impairment) and WHO-FC. The association between classifications was tested using Fisher's exact test, considering the conceptual differences between them.
Results: Most participants presented moderate functional impairment, with an average 6MWT distance of 431.5 ± 110 m, equivalent to 68% of the predicted value. Based on ICF qualifiers, 39% of patients had mild impairment, 42% moderate, and 18% severe impairment. However, no significant association was found between ICF qualifiers and WHO-FC, reflecting the distinct conceptual frameworks of these classifications. Unlike WHO-FC, which applies fixed cutoffs, the ICF-based classification provides a more individualized assessment by incorporating the contrast between expected and actual performance in the 6MWT.
Discussion: The use of ICF qualifiers enabled a more specific evaluation of functional capacity in PH patients, complementing rather than replacing WHO-FC. This approach allows for a more individualized assessment, supporting targeted rehabilitation strategies and improving clinical decision-making in PH management.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.