Evaluating Protein Extraction Techniques for Elucidating Proteomic Changes in Yeast Deletion Strains.

IF 3.6 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Valentina Rossio, Joao A Paulo
{"title":"Evaluating Protein Extraction Techniques for Elucidating Proteomic Changes in Yeast Deletion Strains.","authors":"Valentina Rossio, Joao A Paulo","doi":"10.3390/proteomes13030028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alterations in protein abundance profiles in yeast deletion strains are frequently utilized to gain insights into cellular functions and regulatory networks, most of which are conserved in higher eukaryotes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study investigates the impact of protein extraction methodologies on the whole proteome analysis of <i>S. cerevisiae</i>, comparing detergent-based lysis versus mechanical lysis with silica beads. We evaluated the proteomic profiles of wild-type and two yeast deletion strains, <i>siz1</i>Δ and <i>nfi1</i>Δ (<i>siz2</i>Δ), which are SUMO E3 ligases. Combining isobaric TMTpro-labeling with mass spectrometry using real-time search MS3, we profiled over 4700 proteins, covering approximately 80% of the yeast proteome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hierarchical clustering and principal component analyses revealed that the choice of protein extraction method significantly influenced the proteomic data, overshadowing the genetic variances among these strains. Notably, the detergent-based lysis showed superior performance in extracting proteins compared to mechanical lysis. Despite minimal proteomic alterations among strains, we observed consistent changes regardless of the lysis strategy in proteins such as Ino1, Rep1, Rep2, Snz1, and Fdh1 in both SUMO E3 ligase deletion strains, implying potential redundant mechanisms of control for these proteins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings underscore the importance of method selection at each step of sample preparation in proteomic studies and enhance our comprehension of cellular adaptations to genetic perturbations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20877,"journal":{"name":"Proteomes","volume":"13 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proteomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/proteomes13030028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alterations in protein abundance profiles in yeast deletion strains are frequently utilized to gain insights into cellular functions and regulatory networks, most of which are conserved in higher eukaryotes.

Methods: This study investigates the impact of protein extraction methodologies on the whole proteome analysis of S. cerevisiae, comparing detergent-based lysis versus mechanical lysis with silica beads. We evaluated the proteomic profiles of wild-type and two yeast deletion strains, siz1Δ and nfi1Δ (siz2Δ), which are SUMO E3 ligases. Combining isobaric TMTpro-labeling with mass spectrometry using real-time search MS3, we profiled over 4700 proteins, covering approximately 80% of the yeast proteome.

Results: Hierarchical clustering and principal component analyses revealed that the choice of protein extraction method significantly influenced the proteomic data, overshadowing the genetic variances among these strains. Notably, the detergent-based lysis showed superior performance in extracting proteins compared to mechanical lysis. Despite minimal proteomic alterations among strains, we observed consistent changes regardless of the lysis strategy in proteins such as Ino1, Rep1, Rep2, Snz1, and Fdh1 in both SUMO E3 ligase deletion strains, implying potential redundant mechanisms of control for these proteins.

Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of method selection at each step of sample preparation in proteomic studies and enhance our comprehension of cellular adaptations to genetic perturbations.

酵母缺失菌株蛋白质组学变化的蛋白质提取技术评价。
背景:酵母缺失菌株中蛋白质丰度谱的改变经常被用来深入了解细胞功能和调控网络,其中大多数在高等真核生物中是保守的。方法:本研究考察了蛋白质提取方法对酿酒酵母全蛋白质组分析的影响,比较了基于洗涤剂的裂解和使用硅珠的机械裂解。我们评估了野生型和两个酵母缺失菌株siz1Δ和nfi1Δ (siz2Δ)的蛋白质组学特征,这两个菌株是SUMO E3连接酶。利用实时搜索MS3,将等压tmtpro标记与质谱相结合,我们分析了超过4700个蛋白质,覆盖了酵母蛋白质组的约80%。结果:层次聚类和主成分分析显示,蛋白质提取方法的选择显著影响蛋白质组学数据,掩盖了这些菌株之间的遗传差异。值得注意的是,与机械裂解相比,基于洗涤剂的裂解在提取蛋白质方面表现出优越的性能。尽管菌株之间的蛋白质组学改变很小,但我们观察到在SUMO E3连接酶缺失菌株中Ino1、Rep1、Rep2、Snz1和Fdh1等蛋白的溶解策略不同,都发生了一致的变化,这意味着这些蛋白可能存在冗余控制机制。结论:这些发现强调了蛋白质组学研究中样品制备每一步方法选择的重要性,并增强了我们对细胞适应遗传扰动的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Proteomes
Proteomes Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Proteomes (ISSN 2227-7382) is an open access, peer reviewed journal on all aspects of proteome science. Proteomes covers the multi-disciplinary topics of structural and functional biology, protein chemistry, cell biology, methodology used for protein analysis, including mass spectrometry, protein arrays, bioinformatics, HTS assays, etc. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on the length of papers. Scope: -whole proteome analysis of any organism -disease/pharmaceutical studies -comparative proteomics -protein-ligand/protein interactions -structure/functional proteomics -gene expression -methodology -bioinformatics -applications of proteomics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信