A scoping review of squeeze pouch use among infants and children: Frequency, types, sociodemographic characteristics and parental experiences.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Bianca Smith, Catharine A K Fleming, Ami Seivwright, Katherine Kent
{"title":"A scoping review of squeeze pouch use among infants and children: Frequency, types, sociodemographic characteristics and parental experiences.","authors":"Bianca Smith, Catharine A K Fleming, Ami Seivwright, Katherine Kent","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Demand for infant and child foods in squeeze pouches is increasing, yet limited evidence exists to inform public health strategies on who uses them and why. The aim of this scoping review was to explore the frequency and types of squeeze pouches consumed by children, the sociodemographic characteristics of users and insights from parental experiences regarding their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews. Between January and April 2024, three databases were searched (MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL) in addition to grey literature. Two independent reviewers screened 125 articles, of which 16 underwent full-text review. Results were summarised narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies across five countries were included. Eight studies reported on the prevalence of squeeze pouch consumption, ranging from 23.5% to 82.8% for infants and children. Frequency of intake ranged from daily (n = 4; 8.7%-29.2%), weekly (n = 7; 20.9%-75.2%), to monthly consumption (n = 7 16.7%-70.4%), depending on the study. Predominantly fruit- and dairy-based pouches were consumed. Frequent use was linked to higher deprivation, childcare use, larger families, early breastfeeding cessation and early solid food introduction. Studies on parental perceptions (n = 6) reported their perceived convenience, healthiness and low cost and concerns related to waste.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review identified widespread use of squeeze pouches among infants and children, particularly fruit and dairy-based pouches. More research is needed on their nutritional impact to guide public health strategies promoting healthy early feeding practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.70030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Demand for infant and child foods in squeeze pouches is increasing, yet limited evidence exists to inform public health strategies on who uses them and why. The aim of this scoping review was to explore the frequency and types of squeeze pouches consumed by children, the sociodemographic characteristics of users and insights from parental experiences regarding their use.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews. Between January and April 2024, three databases were searched (MEDLINE, Scopus and CINAHL) in addition to grey literature. Two independent reviewers screened 125 articles, of which 16 underwent full-text review. Results were summarised narratively.

Results: Eleven studies across five countries were included. Eight studies reported on the prevalence of squeeze pouch consumption, ranging from 23.5% to 82.8% for infants and children. Frequency of intake ranged from daily (n = 4; 8.7%-29.2%), weekly (n = 7; 20.9%-75.2%), to monthly consumption (n = 7 16.7%-70.4%), depending on the study. Predominantly fruit- and dairy-based pouches were consumed. Frequent use was linked to higher deprivation, childcare use, larger families, early breastfeeding cessation and early solid food introduction. Studies on parental perceptions (n = 6) reported their perceived convenience, healthiness and low cost and concerns related to waste.

Conclusions: This review identified widespread use of squeeze pouches among infants and children, particularly fruit and dairy-based pouches. More research is needed on their nutritional impact to guide public health strategies promoting healthy early feeding practices.

婴儿和儿童使用挤压袋的范围审查:频率,类型,社会人口特征和父母的经验。
目的:对挤压袋装婴儿和儿童食品的需求正在增加,但现有的证据有限,无法为公共卫生战略提供关于谁在使用它们及其原因的信息。本次范围审查的目的是探讨儿童使用挤压袋的频率和类型,用户的社会人口特征以及父母使用挤压袋的经验。方法:根据乔安娜布里格斯研究所的范围审查指南进行范围审查。在2024年1月至4月期间,除了灰色文献外,检索了三个数据库(MEDLINE, Scopus和CINAHL)。两名独立审稿人筛选了125篇文章,其中16篇进行了全文审查。对结果进行叙述总结。结果:纳入了5个国家的11项研究。8项研究报告了婴儿和儿童挤压袋消费的患病率,从23.5%到82.8%不等。摄入频率从每天(n = 4;8.7%-29.2%),每周(n = 7;20.9%-75.2%),到每月消费(n = 7 16.7%-70.4%),具体取决于研究。消费的主要是水果和奶制品。频繁使用与更高的剥夺、儿童保育使用、大家庭、早期停止母乳喂养和早期引入固体食物有关。关于父母看法的研究(n = 6)报告了他们认为的便利、健康和低成本以及与浪费有关的关切。结论:本综述确定了在婴儿和儿童中广泛使用挤压袋,特别是水果和乳制品袋。需要对其营养影响进行更多研究,以指导促进健康早期喂养做法的公共卫生战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信