Identifying modifiable causes of stress in clinicians and administrators working in New South Wales psychiatric emergency care centres, 2023–24: a qualitative study

IF 8.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jacqueline P Huber, Alyssa Milton, Matthew Brewer, Kat Fry, Sean Evans, Jason Coulthard, Nicholas Glozier
{"title":"Identifying modifiable causes of stress in clinicians and administrators working in New South Wales psychiatric emergency care centres, 2023–24: a qualitative study","authors":"Jacqueline P Huber,&nbsp;Alyssa Milton,&nbsp;Matthew Brewer,&nbsp;Kat Fry,&nbsp;Sean Evans,&nbsp;Jason Coulthard,&nbsp;Nicholas Glozier","doi":"10.5694/mja2.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the experiences of people in various disciplines working in New South Wales psychiatric emergency care centres (PECCs) to identify factors that influence their wellbeing and how they are managed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative study; semi-structured interviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven of twelve New South Wales PECCs, NSW Health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-five nurses, psychiatrists, psychiatry registrars, social workers, occupational therapists, and NSW Health staff working in or with management oversight of PECCs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Experiential relativist framework analysis of the experiences of people working in PECCs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The overarching finding was that working in PECCs involved conflicting, concurrent demands. Three major themes were identified: interactions with the patient: relational work is both meaningful and difficult; interactions with the health care system: conflicting expectations regarding the management of suicide risk causes overwhelming anxiety; and interactions with the hospital: the hospital asks for whatever it needs in the moment, causing clinicians to feel that it does not understand the PECC care model. Two protective factors and processes were also identified: a clear treatment framework reduces uncertainty, enhancing clinician satisfaction and continuity of care for patients; and working in a collaborative team with a flat hierarchy enhances satisfaction and autonomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>People working in PECCs experience tension and, at times, considerable anxiety arising not just from the intense emotional demands of crisis care but also from the conflicting demands and expectations of the system in which they work. This tension reduces staff wellbeing and retention, and consequently patient care. These negative effects can be reduced by team cohesion and having a clear treatment framework.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"223 8","pages":"410-417"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.70009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the experiences of people in various disciplines working in New South Wales psychiatric emergency care centres (PECCs) to identify factors that influence their wellbeing and how they are managed.

Study design

Qualitative study; semi-structured interviews.

Setting

Eleven of twelve New South Wales PECCs, NSW Health.

Participants

Thirty-five nurses, psychiatrists, psychiatry registrars, social workers, occupational therapists, and NSW Health staff working in or with management oversight of PECCs.

Main outcome measures

Experiential relativist framework analysis of the experiences of people working in PECCs.

Results

The overarching finding was that working in PECCs involved conflicting, concurrent demands. Three major themes were identified: interactions with the patient: relational work is both meaningful and difficult; interactions with the health care system: conflicting expectations regarding the management of suicide risk causes overwhelming anxiety; and interactions with the hospital: the hospital asks for whatever it needs in the moment, causing clinicians to feel that it does not understand the PECC care model. Two protective factors and processes were also identified: a clear treatment framework reduces uncertainty, enhancing clinician satisfaction and continuity of care for patients; and working in a collaborative team with a flat hierarchy enhances satisfaction and autonomy.

Conclusion

People working in PECCs experience tension and, at times, considerable anxiety arising not just from the intense emotional demands of crisis care but also from the conflicting demands and expectations of the system in which they work. This tension reduces staff wellbeing and retention, and consequently patient care. These negative effects can be reduced by team cohesion and having a clear treatment framework.

Abstract Image

确定2023- 2024年在新南威尔士州精神紧急护理中心工作的临床医生和行政人员的可改变的压力原因:一项定性研究。
目的:研究在新南威尔士州精神紧急护理中心(PECCs)工作的不同学科人员的经验,以确定影响他们福祉的因素以及如何管理这些因素。研究设计:定性研究;半结构化面试。地点:新南威尔士州健康中心12个pecc中的11个。参与者:35名护士、精神科医生、精神病学登记员、社会工作者、职业治疗师和在pecc工作或与管理监督一起工作的新南威尔士州卫生部工作人员。主要结果测量:经验相对主义框架分析在pecc工作的人的经验。结果:最重要的发现是,在pecc工作涉及冲突的、并发的需求。确定了三个主要主题:与患者的互动:关系工作既有意义又困难;与卫生保健系统的相互作用:关于自杀风险管理的相互矛盾的期望导致压倒性的焦虑;与医院的互动:医院要求任何它需要的时刻,导致临床医生觉得它不理解PECC护理模式。还确定了两个保护因素和过程:明确的治疗框架减少了不确定性,提高了临床医生的满意度和对患者的护理的连续性;在一个层级扁平的协作团队中工作可以提高满意度和自主性。结论:在pecc工作的人会经历紧张,有时会有相当大的焦虑,这不仅来自危机护理的强烈情感需求,还来自他们工作的系统的相互冲突的需求和期望。这种紧张关系降低了员工的幸福感和留任率,从而降低了患者的护理。这些负面影响可以通过团队凝聚力和明确的治疗框架来减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信