Identifying modifiable causes of stress in clinicians and administrators working in New South Wales psychiatric emergency care centres, 2023–24: a qualitative study
Jacqueline P Huber, Alyssa Milton, Matthew Brewer, Kat Fry, Sean Evans, Jason Coulthard, Nicholas Glozier
{"title":"Identifying modifiable causes of stress in clinicians and administrators working in New South Wales psychiatric emergency care centres, 2023–24: a qualitative study","authors":"Jacqueline P Huber, Alyssa Milton, Matthew Brewer, Kat Fry, Sean Evans, Jason Coulthard, Nicholas Glozier","doi":"10.5694/mja2.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To examine the experiences of people in various disciplines working in New South Wales psychiatric emergency care centres (PECCs) to identify factors that influence their wellbeing and how they are managed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative study; semi-structured interviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven of twelve New South Wales PECCs, NSW Health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-five nurses, psychiatrists, psychiatry registrars, social workers, occupational therapists, and NSW Health staff working in or with management oversight of PECCs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Experiential relativist framework analysis of the experiences of people working in PECCs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The overarching finding was that working in PECCs involved conflicting, concurrent demands. Three major themes were identified: interactions with the patient: relational work is both meaningful and difficult; interactions with the health care system: conflicting expectations regarding the management of suicide risk causes overwhelming anxiety; and interactions with the hospital: the hospital asks for whatever it needs in the moment, causing clinicians to feel that it does not understand the PECC care model. Two protective factors and processes were also identified: a clear treatment framework reduces uncertainty, enhancing clinician satisfaction and continuity of care for patients; and working in a collaborative team with a flat hierarchy enhances satisfaction and autonomy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>People working in PECCs experience tension and, at times, considerable anxiety arising not just from the intense emotional demands of crisis care but also from the conflicting demands and expectations of the system in which they work. This tension reduces staff wellbeing and retention, and consequently patient care. These negative effects can be reduced by team cohesion and having a clear treatment framework.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"223 8","pages":"410-417"},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.70009","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
To examine the experiences of people in various disciplines working in New South Wales psychiatric emergency care centres (PECCs) to identify factors that influence their wellbeing and how they are managed.
Study design
Qualitative study; semi-structured interviews.
Setting
Eleven of twelve New South Wales PECCs, NSW Health.
Participants
Thirty-five nurses, psychiatrists, psychiatry registrars, social workers, occupational therapists, and NSW Health staff working in or with management oversight of PECCs.
Main outcome measures
Experiential relativist framework analysis of the experiences of people working in PECCs.
Results
The overarching finding was that working in PECCs involved conflicting, concurrent demands. Three major themes were identified: interactions with the patient: relational work is both meaningful and difficult; interactions with the health care system: conflicting expectations regarding the management of suicide risk causes overwhelming anxiety; and interactions with the hospital: the hospital asks for whatever it needs in the moment, causing clinicians to feel that it does not understand the PECC care model. Two protective factors and processes were also identified: a clear treatment framework reduces uncertainty, enhancing clinician satisfaction and continuity of care for patients; and working in a collaborative team with a flat hierarchy enhances satisfaction and autonomy.
Conclusion
People working in PECCs experience tension and, at times, considerable anxiety arising not just from the intense emotional demands of crisis care but also from the conflicting demands and expectations of the system in which they work. This tension reduces staff wellbeing and retention, and consequently patient care. These negative effects can be reduced by team cohesion and having a clear treatment framework.
期刊介绍:
The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.